Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 6 August 2013 11:03, John Stultz wrote: > On 08/05/2013 05:24 PM, Andy Green wrote: >> >> >> 2) warning-elimination: android: binder >> >> This seems to be a problem with a patch already upstream >> >> 3) warning-elimination: androidization: mm >> >> Problem coming from Androidization patches >

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread John Stultz
On 08/05/2013 05:24 PM, Andy Green wrote: 2) warning-elimination: android: binder This seems to be a problem with a patch already upstream 3) warning-elimination: androidization: mm Problem coming from Androidization patches [snip] 5) warning-elimination: ion: use size_t-specific format In

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 22:11, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:37:10PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: >> On 5 August 2013 18:59, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > - The regmap change isn't something that I've seen upstream... > >> If you mean where did the original come from > > I mean I haven't seen t

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:23:19PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > # Misc fixes which don't belong to any particular topic: > ynk/llct-v3.10-misc-fixes > "Add cross-build support to tools/lib/lk library" > "perf tools: make perf to build in 3.9 kernel tree again" > "ARM: crypto:

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/05/2013 03:37 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 5 August 2013 18:59, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:42:33PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: On 5 August 2013 18:16, Mark Brown wrote: There may be other stuff lurking in linux-linaro that I'm not aware of, everything is supposed to be ind

automated testing at ARM Summit

2013-08-05 Thread Mike Turquette
Hi all, There is currently a thread on LAKML that once again touches on the issue of automated build/boot testing: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/257669 There seemed to be some good discussions between the LAVA team and Kevin at LCE13 and I wanted to make others are aware

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:37:10PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 5 August 2013 18:59, Mark Brown wrote: > > - The regmap change isn't something that I've seen upstream... > If you mean where did the original come from I mean I haven't seen that warning that I'm aware of. > commit 5a08d1560298

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 18:59, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:42:33PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: >> On 5 August 2013 18:16, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > There may be other stuff lurking in linux-linaro that I'm not aware of, >> > everything is supposed to be individually selected for backport.

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:42:33PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 5 August 2013 18:16, Mark Brown wrote: > > There may be other stuff lurking in linux-linaro that I'm not aware of, > > everything is supposed to be individually selected for backport. > Literally linux-linaro I'm not sure is useful

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On 5 August 2013 11:00, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > As was mentioned on linaro-kernel the plan is that you should be > > sending me incremental updates as needed. > > But who decides what's needed? If what is in 3.10 works, why backport a > different version? And I hadn't planned on spending a

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 18:16, Mark Brown wrote: > On 5 August 2013 03:45, Andy Green wrote: > >> >> 1) There seems to be two choices, linux-linaro-lsk and >> linux-linaro-lsk-android. >> >> I chose the android one, I assume it has the same "androidization" >> series on top that linux-linaro-core-tracki

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On 5 August 2013 03:45, Andy Green wrote: > 1) There seems to be two choices, linux-linaro-lsk and > linux-linaro-lsk-android. > > I chose the android one, I assume it has the same "androidization" > series on top that linux-linaro-core-tracking used at 3.10? Are there > any other differences?

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 18:00, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: >> >> > The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how >

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > > The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how > ongoing > > > updates will be

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > > The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how ongoing > > updates will be handled for backport. For example at some point > > "Tweaks to the MCPM code which aren't upstream

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Mark Brown
On 5 August 2013 10:11, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:43 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > > 5) Gator bits don't seem to be in there, presumably that's something > > ARM would like to see in there (it appears in llct) > > Yes, and I believe someone was raising a card to get i

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 5 August 2013 16:58, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > > > tracking-armlt-cci > > CCI driver and CCI PMU patches. > > We started using that the other day trying to track down a nasty bug, > I didn't even know we got it from vexpress ^

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 16:58, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:45 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > >> 2) I saw the vexpress integration stuff from ARM LT was included >> already which is good, is there a wiki page (or README.html or the >> gitweb is also good) explaining the composition?

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 16:43 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 5 August 2013 10:45, Andy Green wrote: > > Hi Mark - > > > > I have some small practical questions about LSK. I was able to make a > > tree with our linux-linaro-core-tracking@v3.10 LT patches on LSK basis > > work well (so far). > > > > I

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:45 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > 2) I saw the vexpress integration stuff from ARM LT was included > already which is good, is there a wiki page (or README.html or the > gitweb is also good) explaining the composition? The vexpress branch is basicall the same as what is in li

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-05 Thread Andy Green
On 5 August 2013 10:45, Andy Green wrote: > Hi Mark - > > I have some small practical questions about LSK. I was able to make a > tree with our linux-linaro-core-tracking@v3.10 LT patches on LSK basis > work well (so far). > > I found this repo (it needs its ./description updating) > > https://gi