On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 10:53 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On 5 August 2013 10:44, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <t...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 17:13 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > > The whole list is good things to have I just wonder how > ongoing > > > updates will be handled for backport. For example at some > point > > "Tweaks to the MCPM code which aren't upstream." will go > upstream and > > probably be a bit different by then, someone should > "revert" (it may > > not be that clean since other patches may have meddled) the > old one in > > lsk and "replace" with the upstream patches. Mark's > watching out for > > that, or you are for the trees you merged that went into > LSK, or > > what's the plan? > > > > Plan? There's no plan that I know of. > > > As was mentioned on linaro-kernel the plan is that you should be > sending me incremental updates as needed.
But who decides what's needed? If what is in 3.10 works, why backport a different version? And I hadn't planned on spending any time on backporting new versions or fixes. -- Tixy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
