On 5 August 2013 10:45, Andy Green <andy.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Mark - > > I have some small practical questions about LSK. I was able to make a > tree with our linux-linaro-core-tracking@v3.10 LT patches on LSK basis > work well (so far). > > I found this repo (it needs its ./description updating) > > https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git;a=summary > > 1) There seems to be two choices, linux-linaro-lsk and > linux-linaro-lsk-android. > > I chose the android one, I assume it has the same "androidization" > series on top that linux-linaro-core-tracking used at 3.10? Are there > any other differences? > > 2) I saw the vexpress integration stuff from ARM LT was included > already which is good, is there a wiki page (or README.html or the > gitweb is also good) explaining the composition? > > 3) In our LT tree we patch mainline to remove all warnings coming with > our defconfig. Then if we see any warnings coming, we know it's our > fault and we need to go fix it. Are you interested in taking a > similar approach? > > 4) Maybe this is too much thinking ahead, but shouldn't these lsk > branches be versioned, like linux-linaro-lsk-3.10? Otherwise when the > next lsk version is announced there'll be a problem.
5) Gator bits don't seem to be in there, presumably that's something ARM would like to see in there (it appears in llct) http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0482a/BABEJAAI.html https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/working/arm/kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/3.10-armlt-gator-5.15 -Andy > -Andy _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
