custom voiceStyle

Dear Ponders, how can one change the defaults for voiceOneStyle? Or is it just as easy to create a custom style? Thank you! Kind regards, Gagi example of code: << \voiceOne { d2~\( d8[es] as16[f g8~]\) } \new Voice { \voiceTwo \voiceOneStyle d2~ d2 } >> \oneVoice _

Re: custom voiceStyle

Ah yes, that's the info i was looking for. Thank you Marc! First i just wanted to turn the red color off, and use it in voiceTwo (to have diamond heads in one voice, while having regular heads in the other). I tried using my macro diamond = \override NoteHead #'style = #'diamond in voiceTwo, but

Re: custom voiceStyle

ues why there is a difference in output? Thank you! Greetings, Gagi On 23 October 2012 19:56, Marc Hohl wrote: > Am 23.10.2012 11:20, schrieb Gagi Petrovic: > > >> Ah yes, that's the info i was looking for. Thank you Marc! >> >> First i just wanted to turn the red c

Re: custom voiceStyle

es] as16[f g8]\) } >\new Voice {\voiceTwo \diamond d2~ d2 } > >> \oneVoice > } > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Gagi Petrovic > *To:* Marc Hohl > *Cc:* lilypond-user@gnu.org > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Re: custom voiceStyle

Allright, so the problem seems to be something else. When i use your exact code it does work (see *directMacro.png*). But i'd like to use it via my " template.ly" file which is in the "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/share/lilypond/current/ly" directory. So i could do something like

Re: custom voiceStyle

Ofcourse, thank you David. Changed my template to Voice instead of Staff and everything works like a charm! Thanks for all the help and kind regards, Gagi On 27 October 2012 10:55, David Kastrup wrote: > Gagi Petrovic writes: > > > Allright, so the problem seems to be something

tupletNumber placement

Dear Ponders, i can't find how to change the placement of the tupletNumber so that the text "sim." is placed under the "*6*" of my tuplet. See attachment. When using *\override TupletNumber #'X-offset = #10* the text stays on top of the number. Any other ways to tweak this? Thank you and all th

Re: tupletNumber placement

Yes, that works perfectly. Thank you! On 20 November 2012 12:08, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2012/11/20 Gagi Petrovic : > > Dear Ponders, i can't find how to change the placement of the > tupletNumber > > so that the text "sim." is placed under the "6" of

Stem #'stroke-style

Hello dear ponders, can someone explain why the example from http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=556 doesn't work in 2.16.1? As you can see in the attachment, the override seems to get ignored. Kind regards, Gagi <>___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond

Re: Stem #'stroke-style

Thank you for the tip David and David :) It works fine now. Unfortunately this (just like acciaccatura) only works on one note instead grouped notes. Basically i simply need the beam to be stroked. Now i'm using the following workaround, but the output is not really satisfactory and i constantly n

zigzag staffline

Dear Ponders, i'm working on a composition where i'm in need of a custom 3-lined-staff with a zigzagged (like the glissando style, see attachment) middle line. Is it possible to make a small adjustement to the code below, or should i start doing some serious tweaking? Any pointers are well apprecia

Re: zigzag staffline

Dear usergroup, since i've had no reaction yet i'm reposting this in case nobody has seen it. Any suggestions? All the best! Gagi On 15 December 2012 10:39, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > Dear Ponders, i'm working on a composition where i'm in need of a custom > 3-lined-st

Re: zigzag staffline

ading material / code about creating StaffSymbols, please share them. Thanks and all the best, Gagi On 18 December 2012 14:40, David Nalesnik wrote: > Gagi, > > > > On 15 December 2012 10:39, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > >> > >> Dear Ponders, i'm working on a compo

Re: zigzag staffline

Hi Thomas, thank you very much for this solution! It looks amazing. If you're curious about the musical result, i will share a recording of the concerts in march and april. Gotta love LP's flexibility and it's dedicated community :) All the best, Gagi On 20 December 2012 09:48, Marc Hohl wrote:

vertical spacing between systems

Dear LilyPond users, the last few days I've been trying some vertical spacing (in v2.14.2) and somehow I can't seem to understand the mechanics of the spacing between systems as explained here. Even after co

vertical spacing between systems

Dear LilyPond users, the last few days I've been trying some vertical spacing (in v2.14.2 on OS 10.6.8) and somehow I can't seem to understand the mechanics of the spacing between systems as explained here.

advanced (?) instrumentname setting

Dear LilyPond-users, after hours of research I decided to ask you the following: - How do I add text which is aligned with certain barlines? This is quite common for percussion notation to indicate which line represents which (part of an) instrument. In my case: which part of a gong to strike. *

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

Yes, thank you Hans. I did * \override MultiMeasureRest #'staff-position = #-0.05* This looks pretty good and it will do. Although I still feel as if the correct positioning (with a small horizontal line) will look more logical and elegant. But I remain with my main issue: *- How do I add text

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

gt; appearance from happening. > > -- > Phil Holmes > > > > ----- Original Message - > *From:* Gagi Petrovic > *To:* Hans Aikema > *Cc:* lilypond-user@gnu.org > *Sent:* Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:35 AM > *Subject:* Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting > &g

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

lies on top of a horizonal line (instead of hanging from it). Cheers, Gagi On 15 April 2012 13:07, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > Oh sorry, I didn't mean barline, but staffline. For example: I want the > upper line of the staff to represent the *edge*, etc. > > *e. ---

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

r improving LilyPond? Thanks for the help anyway! Cheers, Gagi On 15 April 2012 16:40, James wrote: > Gagi, > > On 15 April 2012 12:15, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > > oops, misclicked on "send". Sorry. > > > > I'm looking for something like this, where

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

Hi Kieren, unfortunately it's not what I'm looking for because I also want the instrument name there as in: *\version "2.14.2" * * * *gong = \new Voice {* * * * \set Staff.instrumentName = \markup\right-column{* * \small\bold\italic"e."* * \line{\center-column{\raise #1.5 "Wind " \raise #1.5 "G

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

wrote: > Hello, > > On 16 April 2012 09:13, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > > That's a clever idea James, thank you. > > > > Although I have to say for such a simple thing I find it a waste of the > > extra time I will have in creating the notes for the one percussion >

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

g close but it's still not the way it should be as you can see in the example I added. It seems that using * \hspace#2* gets ignored because of the staff-grouping in the score. But thank you for thinking with me. On 16 April 2012 13:45, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2012/4/16 Gagi Petrovic : &

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > >\override InstrumentName #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT > >\set Staff.instrumentName = \markup \concat{ > > \raise#-1 \center-column{ "Wind " "Gong " } > >

Re: advanced (?) instrumentname setting

I didn't know that trick, thank you David! Op 16 apr. 2012 22:52 schreef "David Kastrup" het volgende: > Gagi Petrovic writes: > > > That's a clever idea James, thank you. > > > > > > Although I have to say for such a simple thing I find it a w

\parenthesize macro bug?

Dear ponders, i just wanted to create a macro for the use of \parenthesize, doing: pa = \parenthesize But whenever i compile the file, i get an error message saying the line after this macro has an "unexpected STRING". After removing the macro, everything is fine. Is anyone experiencing the same

Re: \parenthesize macro bug?

This works perfectly, thank you David! On 27 July 2012 11:30, David Kastrup wrote: > Gagi Petrovic writes: > > > Dear ponders, i just wanted to create a macro for the use of > > \parenthesize, doing: > > > > > > pa = \parenthesize > > > > But whe

wrong placement of timesignature (since 2.16)

Dear ponder, first of all: thank you for the newest version! I noticed though, that since 2.16, the placement of TimeSignature is off in custom line-positions. I added an example to clarify this. Is this is bug or due to some new underlying mechanic? Thank you! Kind regards, Gagi \version "2.16.

Re: LilyPond blog! who wants to join?

Dear LilyPonder, this is awesome! :) Best, Gagi On 2 June 2013 16:17, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2013/6/2 Nils Gey : > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:39:43 +0200 > > Janek Warchoł wrote: > >> However, i think that it should be just another category of posts (as > >> i've already said, i'd like this blog

fermata and phrasing slurs

Dear group, as can be seen in the added example, something seems off. Is this a known issue? Additionally, does anyone have any pointers how to work around this? In other words: how can i still force the TextScript to be under the longer versions of fermata? Thank you very much and all the best,

Re: fermata and phrasing slurs

( b4 c\) d2^"test"^\verylongfermata\( b4 c\) } On 13 November 2013 22:52, Eluze wrote: > Gagi Petrovic wrote > > Dear group, as can be seen in the added example, something seems off. Is > > this a known issue? > > please be specific about what you feel is wro

Re: fermata and phrasing slurs

Ah yes, of course. It works now :) Thanks a lot! On 14 November 2013 00:32, Eluze wrote: > Gagi Petrovic wrote > > I tried your method (see below), but it still doesn't work correctly. Now > > the text is nicely placed under all the fermata, but i don't understand &

umlaut

Hi group, is this umlaut supposed to be like this?? Take a look at this header code and the attached output. \version "2.16.1" \header{ title = "o ó ö" } \relative c' {c1} Should i report it as a bug? All the best, Gagi <>___ lilypond-user mail

Re: umlaut

Okay, i just noticed it's just jEdit that makes the umlait look really weird. Sorry, disregard this message please. On 8 January 2014 15:36, Gagi Petrovic wrote: > Hi group, is this umlaut supposed to be like this?? > > Take a look at this header code and the attached output.

RE: umlaut

Thanks for the replies guys. But like i said: it's jEdit that messes it up in its pdf viewer (not visible in the attachment, my bad). So there is no real problem. Cheers, Gagi On Jan 8, 2014 4:03 PM, "Daniel Rosen" wrote: > > From: Gagi Petrovic [mailto:m...@gagipetrovic.nl

Re: Error with glissando and glissando spans

Hi Jaimie, i just stumbled on the same issue. For me *\override Glissando.breakable = ##t\override Glissando.after-line-breaking = ##t* together work well and without any error in the log. Cheers! Gagi On 4 December 2014 at 16:35, Jaime E Oliver wrote: > Thanks, > > I still get the error in

polyphony and bendAfter

Dear LilyPond group, Does anyone know how to correctly implement a bendAfter with polyphony? When i do \bendAfter #1 c c LilyPond simply ignores the bendAfter. The following example works, but isn't a very efficient/elegant workaround. Besides, it's technically not correct either since the be

Re: polyphony and bendAfter

Hi all, Could the ignoring of the before mentioned bendAfter be a bug, or does it work as intended? If it isn't, where can I do bug reports? And in case it is, where can I propose enhancement requests? Thanks! Gagi On Jan 19, 2015 9:39 AM, "Gagi Petrovic" wrote: > D