Hi all,
Could the ignoring of the before mentioned bendAfter be a bug, or does it
work as intended?
If it isn't, where can I do bug reports?
And in case it is, where can I propose enhancement requests?
Thanks!
Gagi
On Jan 19, 2015 9:39 AM, "Gagi Petrovic" <gagig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear LilyPond group,
>
> Does anyone know how to correctly implement a bendAfter with polyphony?
> When i do
>
> <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c
>
> LilyPond simply ignores the bendAfter.
>
> The following example works, but isn't a very efficient/elegant
> workaround. Besides, it's technically not correct either since the bend
> should depart from both notes.
>
> <<
> {
> \hideNotes
> e2\bendAfter #2
> }
> \\
> { \unHideNotes
> <e a,>2 c c c
> }
> >>
>
>
> Any clue would be greatly appreciated :)
>
> Thanks in advance and all the best,
> Gagi
>
>
> *full code:*
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \score {
> \new Staff {
> \relative c' { \cadenzaOn
>
> <<
> {
> \hideNotes
> e2\bendAfter #2
> }
> \\
> { \unHideNotes
>
> <e a,>2 c c c
> }
> >>
>
> <e a,>\bendAfter #1 c c
>
> }
> }
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
