r
Thanks for the report, Nick, and the advice of the correct destination.
I've created a doc tracker for this:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3028
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
> Richard Shann virgin.net> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 00:58 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > I guess this $ notation is documented somewhere - searching around
> > yesterday evening I came across this
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/not
ot;
> % First cis is printed without alteration even if it's after a bar
> cis4 d cis! d
> \cadenzaOff
> \bar "|"
> @end lilypond
>
> And maybe making all bar numbers visible can be useful even in this example.
&
issue tracker for this.
So, I suggest a tracker for the documentation enhancement, and another
to capture the idea of replacing the existing C++ rational
implementation with an arbitrary precision implementation. That second
tracker may trigger a debate about performance but I'd prefer that
took place on the tracker rather than here on the bug list.
Cheers,
Colin
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Dec 26, 2012 10:49 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
> Colin Hall writes:
>
> > David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> Richard Shann virgin.net> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 00:58 +0100, David Kastr
On Jan 4, 2013 10:51 PM, "Marek Klein" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2013/1/4 Colin Hall
>>
>> Oscar has run into a known issue with the limited precision of
>> Rational in Lilypond.
>>
>> Although David is correct that this issue can crop up
ts.html
[3] https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra/tree/master/bug-squad
--
Colin Hall
Bug Meister
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
et chordChanges = ##f' de-activate the stencil, rather than
> just make the chord markup transparent.
>
> The collision problem seems unrelated, but I'm not in a position
> to be certain.
>
> I remain at your service in this matter.
>
> Jim
Thanks, Jim, I've a
bout it and I agree, it should work as you expect. The
docs are here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-rhythms#ties
I'm going to forward this bug-lilypond, Jim, as this seems to be a
Documentation problem even if it is not a bug.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
_
David Kastrup writes:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
>> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Richard Shann virgin.net> writes:
>>>
>>> > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 00:58 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> > I guess this $ no
Michael Rivers writes:
> I'm not sure if this the right place to ask this
Enhancement requests should be sent to bug-lilypond.
I've included bug-lilypond on this reply to your post, so it is taken
care of now.
@bugsquad
See Michael's original post on lilypond-user.
Cheers,
David Kastrup writes:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> Colin Hall writes:
>>>
>>>> David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Shann virgin.net> writes:
>&g
Colin Hall writes:
> Jim Long writes:
>
>> Please forgive my earlier example, which I had not tested
>> thoroughly.
>>
>> Consider the example below instead, and the attached output.
>>
>> It shows some variations that could be useful when stori
Colin Hall writes:
> Michael Rivers writes:
>
>> I'm not sure if this the right place to ask this
>
> Enhancement requests should be sent to bug-lilypond.
>
> I've included bug-lilypond on this reply to your post, so it is taken
> care of now.
>
>
Colin Hall writes:
> Michael Rivers writes:
>
>> I'm not sure if this the right place to ask this
>
> Enhancement requests should be sent to bug-lilypond.
>
> I've included bug-lilypond on this reply to your post, so it is taken
> care of now.
>
>
> That's what I thought after having sent the mail: the error message
> could be more helpful.
Jim, Noeck, it would be great if you could find the time to submit a bug
report to bug-lilypond about this.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilyp
o determine how to properly solve it, IMHO.
>
> Cc: bug-lilypond
> There is no open issue about this on the tracker AFAICS, so could you
> add it please?
It would be really helpful if you, or Todd, could submit a bug report,
Xavier.
Could you d
mple
>> to a tiny example with just these, and send it to bugs?
>>
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> I just did and hope I did it right (it's my first post to the bug list):
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.bugs/36988
>
That's
{ r c d e | f g a( b) | c1 | }
}
words = \lyricmode {
I want to sing.
Cre -- ate in me a clean heart.
}
\score {
\new Staff <<
\clef treble
\time 4/4
\key c \major
\new Voice = "solo" \notes
\lyricsto "solo" \new Lyrics \words
>>
}
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Todd Hesla writes:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:09:03AM +0000, Colin Hall wrote:
> > Todd Hesla writes:
> >
> > > When processing a repeat block with a leading rest (and lyrics), Lilypond
> > > 2.14.2
> > > adds an extraneous leading repeat sign whe
I ended up taking over maintainership:
>
> http://youtu.be/asQtwd3dJfs
Fab!
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or this; it comes up pretty often on the lists and in my own engraving.
Added new enhancement tracker, see:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3166
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
feature
in Lilypond, don't we? See:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-text#text-spanners
which documents syntax such as:
\override TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text = "rit."
b1\startTextSpan
e,\stopTextSpan
> Bug squad, c
Jay Anderson writes:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Colin Hall wrote:
>>> It would be great to have a TempoTextSpanner, for example in order to
>>> handle common notation such as
>>>
>>> rit. - - - - a tempo
>>> or
>>> r
Xavier Scheuer writes:
> On 13 February 2013 01:43, Colin Hall wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the report, Xavier, but I think we already have this feature
>> in Lilypond, don't we? See:
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-text#text
uot;
>
> \relative c'{
>\clef "G_8"
>\override Staff.OctavateEight.X-offset = #0.7
>c d e f
> }
> %
>
> Nick
I've (belatedly) created a tracker for this, Nick.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3186
Cheers,
Colin.
--
C
t;
> This hack seems to do the trick:
>
Nick, I'm cleaning up bug-lilypond unanswered reports, and found this
one from you.
I take it that you have succeeded in updating your scheme code to
deal with the change in fingering.
So, I'm deciding that there is no bug here, and I tr
mb from 18
> hours to *4 days*, I gave up.
The linuxaudio site went down on 5th January this year, reported by
Francesco here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-01/msg00036.html
It was back up again a few hours later.
Cheers,
C
>
> Yes; when I documented the footnote command I failed to find a way of
> adding a footnote to lyrics. Hence this statement in the NR.
>
> And I raised a bug report at the time:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2819
countered the output, I
> forgot that I had changed from tuplets using sixteenth notes to tuplets
> using eighth notes, and ignored the reason for the problem that was
> staring me in the face when condensing to a minimal example.
Thanks for the prompt retraction, Nick.
Cheers,
Colin.
tor's Guide:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/contributor/documentation-suggestions
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
fine.
My preference is to leave \relative as it is.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
syntax is easier for me when I want to
>> copy/paste notes.
>
> The only thing that works reliably for copy/paste is absolute pitch.
> Relative pitch is always prone to octave errors.
In my early days with Lilypond I learned this to my cost. I've never
used \relative since then
racker and get it onto the work list. Send it to bug-lilypond
or just reply to this and one of us will forward it to bug-lilypond for
you.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
s is my experience, exactly.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
list
>> > bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>>
>> That's me...
>> I'll try to post a fix tonight or tomorrow.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> MS
>>
>>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues
" construct where you want to use \unfoldRepeats and have the
lyrics repeated. As Colin says, I've never done this.
There is a tracker for a design change to take care of this here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3149
but I'm not
s an argument type (there is no sense
> in tweaking the script priority of a basic music expression like a
> note).
Thanks for the report, Nick, and the advice, David.
I've created a doc tracker for this:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3280
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
es accept the additional
effort required because they are perfectionists.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
feel ready..i must learn more..
>>> I am the type of a guy who wants to script everything that is done
>>> more then once..I'd rather if it would be possible script physical
>>> stuff too..
>> That reminds me of my plan to have an issue tracker for my life ;-)
>
David Kastrup writes:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
>> Here is a piece of opinion from me, so you know my position. Users of
>> WYSIWYG engraving software accept the shortcomings because it is quick
>> and effective. Users of text-based approaches accept the additional
>>
Urs Liska writes:
> Am Samstag, den 20.04.2013, 11:50 +0100 schrieb Colin Hall:
> >
> > Can you be more specific about your audience?
> This is an important comment because it clearly shows that there is some
> work to do.
> (Although I assume that with a revision of t
ar my hair out because Finale reverted (as an average)
> half of my manual decisions.
> Then I didn't have the faintest idea that there is something
> like a 'text format' where such decisions could be
> stored explicitely
Attaboy! Now you're ta
nt repeats" found in section
> 1.4.2 of the notation manual of the current stable release.
>
> -David
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Co
I also break the music and words up into the smallest common chunks
across all parts, and then reassemble them to create score, parts and midi.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
West Linton
Scotland
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
r"||"
>
>
> and I get
>
> sctb.ly:75:44: warning: barcheck failed at: -1/4
> \time 2/4 8
>|
There are only three quarter-notes in the bar containing "d\fermata" mark.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
__
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:11:22PM +0100, Helge Kruse wrote:
> There is a little typo on http://www.lilypond.org/text-input.de.html.
> You read FagottNoteb where it should be FagottNoten.
>
> Regards,
> Helge
Thanks, Helge. I'm forwarding this to bug-lilypond.
Cheers,
Coli
pports what is
> actually asked by many users: bar numbering of alternatives should not
> be counted twice.
Thanks, Xavier. Added to the tracker as issue 2059:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2059
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
_
g?
Send me what info you can and I'll do my best to help.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
#x27;m unable (due to my ignorance and lack of resources) to determine if this is
unexpected behaviour or not. I'm going to ask for help from the developers on
this and then get back to you.I can't determine I'll have to get some help from
the developers.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
e are examples enhancement requests
on the issue tracker.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list
Send your request to the bug report list as Xavier outlined above.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ould you like to submit a bug report, as described here?
http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:14:09PM -0800, flup2 wrote:
>
> Same problem here. LilyPad editor doesn't work (but no problem from command
> line or frescobaldi).
Stan, Phillipe, would you care to submit a bug report?
See http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html
Cheers,
Coli
reduce the file, but you'll find lp
> unexpectly aborts at bar 240. I remember it ever aborts at bar
> 160-168, due to temporarily added staves.
What version of Lilypond you are running?
What operating system?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
__
the memory usage peaked at about 500 MB during compilation.
Perhaps your computer is running low on resources during the compilation. Is
that possible?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
by private email.
Take a look at them and let me know what is wrong.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ww.lilypond.org/contact.html
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 06:01:22AM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 5:49, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > If you have a suitable machine you can help by downloading Lilypond 2.15.30
> > and running it on your Mac, as follows:
> >
> > a) Downloa
;second-level" beam subdivisions.
>
> Please add this as a feature request. I have been looking for a good
> example of what it means to have multiple subdivision.
Created issue tracker 2361 for this enhancement request.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2361
C
me on both
> platforms.
I'd just like you to confirm something for me. I believe that you are running a
copy of 2.15.30-1 in which you have edited the Info.plist file to restore the
missing "" delimiter. Is that correct?
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
__
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:57:06PM +, Nick Goddard wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2012, at 12:22, Colin Hall wrote:
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: Issue 1781 in lilypond: Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion) cannot run
> >> LilyPond
> >>
> >> Comment #22 on issue 1781 by nfgod
and on page three it is above the tagline.
Thanks for the bug report Nick. I was able to reproduce the ugly footnote.
New issue tracker 2369
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2369
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user
.
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 04:54:20PM +0100, ole wrote:
> I have also an old PPC Powerbook which is running the latest 10.4 and can do
> some testing if it is needed...
>
> ole
>
>
> Am 02.03.2012 um 16:28 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24,
unds an attractive approach I can send you examples.
I don't know, but I suspect that tools like Frescobaldi and LilyOrch
(spelling?) do exactly this but in an automated fashion.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilyp
r.501:
> > ([0x0-0x91b91b].LilyPond[24997]) Exited with code: 255
> >
> > Apologies for the dump but not sure what to do with that! Seemed to
> > deserve a report somewhere - if not here, again apologies, will forward to
> > if and as I can.
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> >
> > ___
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
> >
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:57:41PM +0100, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
>
> And @Colin if you want to you can send me an example so that i can see
> how you managed to solve some problems in this big grandscores..i
> didnt find many documentary on this topic.
Sure, will do.
Cheers,
Colin.
eck it out.
I'll log your verification report to the issue tracker here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2338
I'm hoping to get some of the other MacOS X configurations checked out and, if
all is well, mark that issue as verifi
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:20:05AM -0800, flup2 wrote:
>
> Same with me using MacOS X 10.7 Lion with x86, everything working :-)
>
> Philippe
Thanks for checking that out so soon after the release, Philippe. Good work.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
t; info.plist
I saw this post from you, a few days ago, in which you report seeing Issue 2338
with Lilypond on your MacOS X machine.
I encourage you to check out the new development release 2.15.32 which contains
a candidate fix for Issue 2338.
Would be great to hear that the new release works ok
if it does or does not work
for you.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>\relative c'
> >{
> > \key c \major
> > \time 2/4
> > c2 ~
> > \cadenzaOn
> > c4 \teeny d8-[ es f g-] \normalsize a4-\fermata
> > \cadenzaOff
> > \bar "|"
> > e2 % how to suppress accidental cancellation here?
>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:16:55AM +0100, Hans Aikema wrote:
> On 5-3-2012 23:50, Colin Hall wrote:
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 06:33:49PM +0100, Hans Aikema wrote:
> >>It is a known bug presumed to be solved by the yet-to-be-released
> >>
\time 2/4
> c2
> \cadenzaOn
> c2 d8-[ e \bar "|" f g-]
> \cadenzaOff
> \bar "|"
> \grace b8 \bar "|"
> a4. \bar "|" gis8 \bar "|"
> e'8 \bar "|" e \bar "|" e \
| | Hans Aikema| verified |
|-+-++--|
| 10.7.x | x86 | Phillipe | verified |
|-+-++--|
Thanks to all the users who helped with testing!
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user m
ok |
|-+-+-|
I have conflicting reports for the status of Lilypond on MacOS X
10.4.11 on x86 processors. Feel free to give it a try and let me know
what you find.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 08:50:35PM -0600, James Worlton wrote:
> I have downloaded and extracted Lilypond 2.15.33 on my PPC Mac 10.4.11.
> Everything seems to work fine. No problems here!
>
> James Worlton
Thanks for the feedback, James.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
> I'm not top posting.
Tim McNamara bitstream.net> writes:
>
> 2.15.22 and 2.15.33 launch correctly and compile the test file just fine on
> my
MacBook Pro running OS X 10.6.8.
>
Thanks for the report, Tim. I also heard from James Worlton. Updated status
below.
In this table below "ok" mea
> lower = {
> \clef "bass"
> \times 4/6 { c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 } |
> \times 4/6 { c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 } |
> \times 4/6 { c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 } |
> \times 4/6 { c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 c8 } |
> }
>
> \score {
> \new PianoStaff <<
> \new Staff = "u
> I'm not top posting
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
>
> I would expect that all four beams should be subdivided, but only the
> second beam in the bar is being subdivided:
>
> \version "2.15.33"
>
> \relative c' {
> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
> \set b
|
|-+-+---|
Users who helped with testing include Ole Schmidt, Valentin Villenave,
James Worlton, Klaus Foehl, Stan Sanderson, Tim McNamara, Eric
Schissel, Hans Aikema, Brian Alliford, Phillipe and Hans Aberg. Thanks
very much to all of you for checking out the new release.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin
1749
it is specialised and does not cover the behaviour reported by Nick
and confirmed by James.
I've created an issue tracker for this:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2501
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user maili
http://www.noteworthysoftware.com/
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
er of issue trackers relating to musicxml2ly but I see
no issue tracker for this bug, Martin.
I'd like to at least record the bug. We can create a tracker if you
supply these details:
1. A version of lilypond/musicxml2ly and a specific lead sheet from Wikifonia
in MusicXML format that toge
for the chord symbol bug:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5697059/. I still haven't found the
> time to tidy up the patch. But it works!
Thanks, Patrick. I'm going to move this conversation to bug-lilypond cc Martin
and respond in full the
ly.
It would be very helpful to us if you tried an official Lilypond
release binary on your Lilypond source. If it works, great, the job is
done. If it fails please let us know.
There is a known issue with tremolo which looks similar to your report:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/deta
>strategy to you as a starting point for investigation, adding some of the
> >technical terms to help you getting used to them.
> >
> >Hope it helps and not just annoys,
> >
> > Susan
> >
> >
> >_______
> &
Hi Urs,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:42:14AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 22.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
> >On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >>In the meantime I had already decided to go this way for the next
> >>projects. Our curre
bj: Build token free.
(Rest of team do a git fetch or something like that)
From: Susan
Subj: Taking the build token
(Susan integrates new coda section)
etc etc
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> thanks for your patience. I somehow start to see some light ;-)
Good!
> Am 22.05.2012 10:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
> >On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> > > Do I understand correctly t
ny of us could write in thirty minutes,
say, on our own, but share the work via git.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
South Mains
West Linton
EH46 7AY
Scotland
Tel: 01968 661994
Mob: 07786 677582
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:42:17PM +, Jeff wrote:
> I'm trying to post a crash report.
>
> It seems all my messages are getting bounced from the list server.
>
> ??
I see your post to lilypond-user, Jeff.
Cheers,
Col
Hi Marcos,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using a tremolo in a full bar. I used the code below, but it fails
> > and I got this error me
t the beat" so it looks like the design is not clear.
There is an existing, open tracker for beaming in 3/4:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1817
I'm creating a tracker so that someone can take up the task of
designing this feature.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypo
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:14:38AM +, Keith OHara wrote:
> Colin Hall gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:40:04AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:08:44PM -0300, Marcos da Silva Sampaio wrote:
> > > >
>
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:35:40AM +0200, Janek Warcho wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> > Colin Hall gmail.com> writes:
> >> Have you had a chance to try your Lilypond source with an official binary
> >> release yet?
> >
>
gt;
> > it is being tracked at
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2562
> >
> I started cutting down the example, and recognize the problem now. A voice
> switching from one staff to another, as in piano music, near the end of a
> piece. I'll pos
Hi,
Is anyone on the list aware of a tool that takes a valid Lilypond
score as input and produces as output the same .ly file but with the
formatting and layout standardized?
If you know asyle, then I am looking for astyle for Lilypond.
Cheers
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 01:20:08AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:44:00AM +0100, Colin Hall wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone on the list aware of a tool that takes a valid Lilypond
> > score as input and produces as output the same .ly file but with t
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:26:36AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Colin Hall writes:
>
> > Exactly. My intended application is to use it as part of a git
> > collaboration workflow that Urs, Janek, Susan(?) and I are working on.
>
> It is not really helpful for dif
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:09:26AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il 07/06/2012 02:49, Colin Hall ha scritto:
> >It seems to be equipped to run as a program:
> >
> >lgc$
> >wgethttp://lilykde.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/frescobaldi/python/ly/indent.py
> >lgc$
>
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
