Todd Hesla writes:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:09:03AM +0000, Colin Hall wrote:
> > Todd Hesla writes:
> >
> > > When processing a repeat block with a leading rest (and lyrics), Lilypond
> > > 2.14.2
> > > adds an extraneous leading repeat sign where the lyrics start (after the
> > > rest).
> > > The snippet below reliably reproduces the problem. If the lyrics are
> > > removed
> > > (that is, if the "lyricsto" line is commented out), the extraneous repeat
> > > sign
> > > disappears.
> > >
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > > \version "2.14.2"
> > >
> > > notes = \relative c' {
> > > c4 c c c |
> > > \repeat volta 2 { r c d e | f g a( b) | c1 | }
> > > }
> > >
> > > words = \lyricmode {
> > > I want to sing.
> > > \repeat volta 2 {
> > > Cre -- ate in me a clean heart.
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > \score {
> > > \new Staff <<
> > > \clef treble
> > > \time 4/4
> > > \key c \major
> > > \new Voice = "solo" \notes
> > > \lyricsto "solo" \new Lyrics \words
> > > >>
> > > }
> >
> > Just had a play with this. I have never used \repeat within lyrics and I
> > was surprised to see that you had done so.
> >
> > How about:
> >
> > \version "2.14.2"
> >
> > notes = \relative c' {
> > c4 c c c |
> > \repeat volta 2 { r c d e | f g a( b) | c1 | }
> > }
> >
> > words = \lyricmode {
> > I want to sing.
> > Cre -- ate in me a clean heart.
> > }
> >
> > \score {
> > \new Staff <<
> > \clef treble
> > \time 4/4
> > \key c \major
> > \new Voice = "solo" \notes
> > \lyricsto "solo" \new Lyrics \words
> > >>
> > }
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Colin.
> >
> > --
> > Colin Hall
>
> Interesting. The code you presented actually works
I've never done it any other way, and it's been a few years now.
> despite not following the guidelines in the Notation Reference
> (Section 2.1.2, "Techniques specific to lyrics", subsection "Lyrics
> and repeats"), where it it clearly says that one should use a parallel
> "repeat" construct inside the lyrics definition.
Yes, I saw that.
> So maybe it's actually a documentation bug, not a code bug per se?
I suspect it is both.
All those examples you referred to in NR 2.1.2 ought to work with rests
in the music.
> But thanks very much for the code suggestion--it will enable me to avoid doing
> the repeat manually (not that that would be such a tragedy).
You can help us improve Lilypond by submitting a bug report. Could you
do that please? Instructions on how to do this are here:
http://lilypond.org/bug-reports.html
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
