Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 11:42 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Can you give a bit more context? What instrument? I gave a link to a scan of the original print, but here is a link to the page where there is a choice of 80Mb or 4.5Mb scans of the print. http://imslp.org/wiki/12_Recorder_Sonatas,_Op.3_%

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

HI Richard, On 22/05/2016, 5:41 PM, "Richard Shann" wrote: >I gave a link to a scan of the original print, You can’t view it unless you are a subscriber to IMSLP. Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 17:51 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > HI Richard, > > On 22/05/2016, 5:41 PM, "Richard Shann" wrote: > > >I gave a link to a scan of the original print, > > You can’t view it unless you are a subscriber to IMSLP. I heard they had introduced some sort of penalty system on I

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Hi Richard, Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing errors. Even though an old print, it’s pretty miserable music prin

Ask about the typesetting of Lilypond

Hello : I am using Lilypond to make a music score. But I found there are many bars in one line, and it is not very beautiful as the picture below shows. Could I ask u how to define the number of bars of each line? Thank you very much. ___ lilypond

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Please be careful about distributing such information about IMSLP. It is incorrect. IMSLP still allows anyone to download any score for free and without registration, but you have to wait a short time, I think 10 seconds, before downloading. If you are a subscriber, you don't have the wait pena

Re: Ask about the typesetting of Lilypond

Il giorno dom 22 mag 2016 alle 9:51, 15221328968 <15221328...@163.com> ha scritto: Hello : I am using Lilypond to make a music score. But I found there are many bars in one line, and it is not very beautiful as the picture below shows. Could I ask u how to define the number of bars of each l

combine different note heads (drumset)

Hello, I would like to define a note head type (or modify/tweak an existing one) that uses a combination of 2 existing note heads from the Feta font. I'm trying to use the notation proposed by Norman Weinberg in his book Guide to Standardized Drumset Notation. Hi-Hat and Cymbals for instance us

Re: halfopenvertical script glyph not working

2016-05-22 8:28 GMT+02:00 Daniel E. Moctezuma : > Hello, > > I'm trying to use the "halfopenvertical" glyph on a Hi-Hat note when writting > for Drumset. > "halfopen" works fine, but the vertical version doesn't. > > I get an error saying "script direction not yet known" and I'm not sure how > to

Re: halfopenvertical script glyph not working

Thank you! It works as expected. I would like to understand why it didn't work in the first place. It looks like the glyph is defined in the Feta font but not actually used (defined in mf/feta-scripts.mf:623). Do you know why "halfopenvertical" was not part of script.scm? On 05/22 10:46, Thomas

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On 22.05.2016 10:18, Rutger Hofman wrote: Please be careful about distributing such information about IMSLP. It is incorrect. IMSLP still allows anyone to download any score for free and without registration, but you have to wait a short time, I think 10 seconds, 15, actually. before downloa

Re: combine different note heads (drumset)

2016-05-22 10:34 GMT+02:00 Daniel E. Moctezuma : > Hello, > > I would like to define a note head type (or modify/tweak an existing one) > that uses a combination of 2 existing note heads from the Feta font. > I'm trying to use the notation proposed by Norman Weinberg in his book Guide > to Standa

Re: halfopenvertical script glyph not working

2016-05-22 11:12 GMT+02:00 Daniel E. Moctezuma : > Do you know why "halfopenvertical" was not part of script.scm? Don't know. Maybe file a bug-report -Harm ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 18:01 +1000, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Studying this in the full context of the scanned original, it’s clear to me > these are ‘t.’ glyphs, and the edges of the type form have smudged from time > to time. I notice there are some ‘.t’ forms – probably printing

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

Hi Richard, When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been reviewed for copyright, or is currently restricted due to various reasons. The block will be lifted after the file is reviewed for copy

Re: combine different note heads (drumset)

Thank you very much for your help Thomas! For a moment I even considered extending on Feta font to support this stuff. It seems the scheme function can be extended to support other noteheads, etc., so it might be a nice approach for what I'm looking to do. Thanks again. On 05/22 12:07, Thomas M

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Richard, When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been reviewed for copyright, or is currently restricted due to various reasons. The block will

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 13:26 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as follows: > > > > You have reached this page because the file you requested has not been > > reviewed for

Re: Guitar harmonics indicators

On Fri, 20 May 2016 17:40:10 +0200 BB wrote: Hsrmonics, also called "flagolets" may be indicated by small circles above the notes. They should be accompanied by an 8va to give true pitch if necessary. The diamond shaped note indicates a case where the pitch is not necessarily the true pitch but

Re: Ask about the typesetting of Lilypond

On 16-05-22 02:18 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno dom 22 mag 2016 alle 9:51, 15221328968 <15221328...@163.com> ha scritto: Hello : I am using Lilypond to make a music score. But I found there are many bars in one line, and it is not very beautiful as the picture below shows. Could I ask

Re: What is the correct way(TM) to set a Rezitationston?

Am 19.05.2016 um 17:21 schrieb David Wright: > I printed and processed the pot of coffee for myself, and thought I > might as well put it into these archives. > > I added the overlooked lyric alignment, changed the hyphenation (most > disappears) and removed the indentation. Ragged right closes up

Re: What is the correct way(TM) to set a Rezitationston?

Hi Am 22.05.2016 um 20:52 schrieb Rüdiger Ranft: > But I don't know how to hide the text assigned to the hidden > note, and now filled in the NARROW NO-BREAK SPACE Unicode character. http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/learning/aligning-lyrics-to-a-melody A underscore _ in the lyric text

Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

I'm having trouble typesetting an ornament in the fifth measure of the Sarabande from the E-flat French Suite. An image can be found at https://www.dropbox.com/s/hhgmne640fs1twb/ornament.jpg?dl=0 The ornament in question is the two in-staff markings on the dotted-quarter A. Unfortunately, I do

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

Hi Sam, \prall ? Hope that helps! Kieren. On May 22, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Sam Bivens wrote: > I'm having trouble typesetting an ornament in the fifth measure of the > Sarabande from the E-flat French Suite. An image ca

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

Kieren has given you the answer, but 2 minutes browsing http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/list-of-articulations would have allowed you to find it yourself, and possibly find others you need in the future. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: Sam Bivens

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

In the OP's defense: I believe Sam wasn't talking about the \prall glyph but the in-staff symbol just to the left of the A note head that looks a bit like a tied letter c. What it is, however, I don't know ... maybe just that - the letter c? __ It is wrong always, everywhere, and for any

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

> On 22 May 2016, at 21:43, Sam Bivens wrote: > > I'm having trouble typesetting an ornament in the fifth measure of the > Sarabande from the E-flat French Suite. An image can be found at > https://www.dropbox.com/s/hhgmne640fs1twb/ornament.jpg?dl=0 The ornament in > question is the two in-st

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

Robert, > I believe Sam wasn't talking about the \prall glyph but the in-staff symbol > just to the left of the A note head that looks a bit like a tied letter c. Yep. My bad. Apologies for the noise. K. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.

Re: Unknown marking in Roman print (1710)

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 12:46 +0100, Richard Shann wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 13:26 +0200, Simon Albrecht wrote: > > On 22.05.2016 13:01, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > When attempting to view your score on IMSLP, I get an error page as > > > follows: > > > > > > You have re

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

2016-05-22 21:43 GMT+02:00 Sam Bivens : > I'm having trouble typesetting an ornament in the fifth measure of the > Sarabande from the E-flat French Suite. An image can be found at > https://www.dropbox.com/s/hhgmne640fs1twb/ornament.jpg?dl=0 The ornament in > question is the two in-staff markings o

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

Hi Harm, This was *incredibly* helpful. I've now toyed around with a few versions, some using a couple of different mensural glyphs as well, just to see which version my colleague likes best. Thanks so much! Sam On 05/22/2016 06:16 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: 2016-05-22 21:43 GMT+02:00 Sam B

Re: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5

Hi Sam, On 23/05/2016, 5:43 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Sam Bivens" wrote: I want to mimic the given edition as closely as possible; Do you want to do that or do you want to get close to what Bach wrote? If you look at the Bach autograph of this piece, available in the Digital Bach Archiv

How to determine if a KeySignature is default or not

Is there an easy way to determine if a KeySignature grob is present because of a key change event, or just because a new line was started? The Clef gob has a non-default property that contains this info, but it doesn't have a value for KeySignature, and I couldn't find any other property that look