In the OP's defense: I believe Sam wasn't talking about the \prall glyph but 
the in-staff symbol just to the left of the A note head that looks a bit like a 
tied letter c. What it is, however, I don't know ... maybe just that - the 
letter c?



______

It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon 
insufficient evidence. 
-- William Kingdon Clifford


> On 22 May 2016, at 22:22, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:
> 
> Kieren has given you the answer, but 2 minutes browsing 
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/list-of-articulations 
> would have allowed you to find it yourself, and possibly find others you need 
> in the future.
> 
> --
> Phil Holmes
>  
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Bivens
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2016 8:43 PM
> Subject: Typesetting a Bach Ornament; Sarabande, French Suite 5
> 
> I'm having trouble typesetting an ornament in the fifth measure of the    
> Sarabande from the E-flat French Suite. An image can be found at 
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/hhgmne640fs1twb/ornament.jpg?dl=0 The ornament in 
> question is the two in-staff markings on the dotted-quarter A.
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't know the edition (I only have a photocopy of this 
> movement, and it's not on IMSLP). Nor have I even been able to track down 
> exactly what this ornament is. The closest I've found is the Nachschlag at 
> http://www.iment.com/maida/familytree/henry/music/bachnotation.htm#passinga 
> (The double-slur-like figure from Invention 3 at the bottom of that section 
> is similar to what appears in the Henle version of the Sarabande.)
> I want to mimic the given edition as closely as possible; could anyone help 
> me out with typesetting this? I hate to ask, because it will look like I've 
> put forth zero effort; but it's just because I legitimately have no clue 
> where to begin.
> 
> http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/adding-ornamentations-to-note-heads-part-1/ 
> at Scores of Beauty looked promising, but I can't even manage to get that to 
> compile; I'm guessing something in LilyPond has happened since that was 
> published that prevents it from working in my 2.19.40.
> 
> I've attached a laughably barren MWE; it'll save about 4 seconds.
> 
> Sam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to