Hello Colin
Yes the melody notes on the staff play as a "guitar" but the chords sound as
the default piano.
>-Original Message-
>From: Colin Campbell [mailto:c...@shaw.ca]
>Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 1:02 AM
>To: Peter Gentry; lilypond-user@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: More ponderings
Thanks Chris I guessed most of the format but the # Escaped me. To # or not
to # that is the question.
>Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:33:22 -0600
>From: "Christopher R. Maden"
>To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>On 02/05/2016 02:31 PM, Peter Gentry wrote:
>> I cannot discover a means to have the chor
I must be a tad slow. However I incorporate your suggestion still no guitar
sounds when the chords play (only for the melody notes).
The snippet does compile without error but seems to have zero effect.
Thanks Chris I guessed most of the format but the # Escaped me. To # or not
to # that is
Just to be sure. You removed the \chordnames part and added the \chords.
When I did this I got a guitar (well, it didn't sound like a guitar, but
it was not a piano) both for the melody and the chords.
I think it would be beneficial if you attached the .ly file so we can
see what you have done
Hi Harm,
Thank you very much for your help.
Ref.: "You could have added what exactly you tried already.” :
It did not work, probably because I just inserted it into the text instead of
placing it outside the pair of quotation marks. I was not aware of that
condition.
I'm glad you also pointed o
Dear Joram,
Thank you for your help.
I had already tried \concat { "5" \super "ths" } but it did not work. I see
now that this code must be outside the pair of quotemarks containing the
"normal" text, a condition I wasn't aware of.
I'm glad you also pointed out the possibilities to fine-tune t
Dear Abraham,
Thank you for your advice, which did help. I had already tried \concat { a
\super b }, but it did not work because, as I see now, I had just inserted it
into the text instead of placing it outside the pair of quotation marks.
I'm glad you also pointed out the possibilities to fine
"Peter Gentry" writes:
> Thanks Chris I guessed most of the format but the # Escaped me. To
> # or not to # that is the question.
>
>> \chords {
>> \set ChordNames.midiInstrument = #"acoustic guitar (steel)"
>> \myChordsTransposed
>> }
I don't think that leaving off #
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 11:27:16 +0100
From: "lilyp...@andis59.se"
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: More ponderings on Chordmode
Message-ID: <56b5ca84.8050...@andis59.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Just to be sure. You removed the \chordnames par
>-Original Message-
>From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 10:50 AM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; 'Christopher R. Maden'
>Subject: Re: More ponderings on Chordmode
>
>"Peter Gentry" writes:
>
>> Thanks Chris I guessed most of the f
On 2016-02-06 12:05, Peter Gentry wrote:
I have tried a couple of different instrument names. The chord sound does vary
but still very much piano like.
\score {
<<
\chords {
\set ChordNames.midiInstrument = #"banjo"
\myChordsTransposed
}
\new FretBoards {
\set Staff.stringTunin
>-Original Message-
>From: lilyp...@andis59.se [mailto:lilyp...@andis59.se]
>Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 11:24 AM
>To: Peter Gentry; lilypond-user@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: More ponderings on Chord
// Anders wrote
>I'm just using the in Windows built in synthesizer so it
>doesn't sound
It may or may not be relevant but I find if I do what have you done I
can get it change to sample to a guitar sound. However it doesn't
sound like a guitar to me unless I sort out the chord voicing to a
guitar inversion as well. This is quite a bit of work so I usually
silence the chord names so th
>-Original Message-
>From: Steve Downes [mailto:st...@kingswayelec.co.uk]
>Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 11:48 AM
>To: lilyp...@andis59.se
>Cc: Peter Gentry; lilypond-user@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: More ponderings on Chordmode
>
>It may or may not be relevant but I find if I do what hav
"Peter Gentry" writes:
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: David Kastrup [mailto:d...@gnu.org]
>>Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 10:50 AM
>>To: Peter Gentry
>>Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org; 'Christopher R. Maden'
>>Subject: Re: More ponderings on Chordmode
>>
>>"Peter Gentry" writes:
>>
>>
Dear all,
in a recent question on this list [1] about \super in markup text, all
three replies suggested to tweak the vertical position of superscripts
by hand because the default is obviously too high.
I compared the Lilypond result of \super and \sub to the equivalents in
LaTeX (because who wou
Hi Joram,
> I compared the Lilypond result of \super and \sub to the equivalents in
> LaTeX (because who would doubt that LaTeX is wrong in such a question)
=)
> Of course LilyPond's emphasis is on beautiful music notation,
> but I think also text parts of scores should look good.
Agreed!
> -
Kieren MacMillan wrote Saturday, February 06, 2016 8:03 PM
>> - raise the superscript by 0.8 instead of 1.0
>> - lower the subscript by -0.4 instead of -0.75
>
> In my opinion, these are both improvements on the current default.
I agree.
Trevor
___
l
+1
See the wish I had in 2013:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/WISH-about-super-and-sub-td152384.html
Pierre
2016-02-06 21:34 GMT+01:00 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Kieren MacMillan wrote Saturday, February 06, 2016 8:03 PM
>
> >> - raise the superscript by 0.8 instead of 1.0
> >> - lower the subs
>> I compared the Lilypond result of \super and \sub to the
>> equivalents in LaTeX (because who would doubt that LaTeX is wrong
>> in such a question)
Please have a look at other, non-CM fonts also, since CM is sometimes
a bit peculiar :-)
>> - raise the superscript by 0.8 instead of 1.0
>> - l
Joram,
As you say, LaTeX is for producing beautiful mathematics and LilyPond is for
producing beautiful music. It’s possible that the conventions in the two
different kinds of typography differ in their placement of sub and
superscripts, and so LaTeX and LilyPond should differ in their behavior
Hi all,
Please be so kind to attached objective examples including publishers' name.
What you "imagine", what's "possible" or "seems like" won't help much
here...
Cheers,
Pierre
2016-02-06 22:24 GMT+01:00 John Gourlay :
> Joram,
>
> As you say, LaTeX is for producing beautiful mathematics and Lil
Am 6. Februar 2016 22:24:41 MEZ, schrieb John Gourlay
:
>Joram,
>
>As you say, LaTeX is for producing beautiful mathematics and LilyPond
>is for producing beautiful music. It’s possible that the conventions in
>the two different kinds of typography differ in their placement of sub
>and superscri
Greetings All,
Having searched rather thoroughly through the archives, I understand
that the issue of grace notes within voice contexts is a perenial one.
Unfortunately, the Known Issues and Warnings does not address my
problem, and the example is, to my mind, incredibly contrived. At the
root of
On 07.02.2016 01:13, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
Having searched rather thoroughly through the archives, I understand
that the issue of grace notes within voice contexts is a perennial one.
Unfortunately, the Known Issues and Warnings do not address my
problem, and the example is, to my mind, incredibly
I was thinking that text produced by LilyPond would likely be about music, with
references, for example, to chords with superscripts in their names. It would
appear odd if the chord names in text appeared differently than in the music
itself.
John
___
26 matches
Mail list logo
