Am 6. Februar 2016 22:24:41 MEZ, schrieb John Gourlay <j...@weathervanefarm.net>: >Joram, > >As you say, LaTeX is for producing beautiful mathematics and LilyPond >is for producing beautiful music. It’s possible that the conventions in >the two different kinds of typography differ in their placement of sub >and superscripts, and so LaTeX and LilyPond should differ in their >behavior.
I'm sure Joram is not speaking of formulas but of superscript in plain text paragraphs. And I don't see why we shouldn't take LaTeX with its decades of typesetting experience as a model for the plain text parts of LilyPond scores. If LilyPond scores contain text areas they should of course look good, and there is much room for improvement here. My 2 Ct. Urs >This seems like the first question that should be answered >before asking whether LilyPond is making the best placement choices. >I’ll let people with more experience in music notation weigh in. > >John Gourlay > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
