The way I typically set up a project is to have a score file for the
conductor's score and each of the parts, all of which \include a file which
contains all the music for the piece. I also have each of these files (the
score files and the music file) \include library files with my various
snippet
Am 18.12.2011 23:04, schrieb James:
Hello,
On 18 December 2011 21:19, C.Flothow wrote:
The following turned up when I tried to print out the part of the first
violin in a Christmas piece. I'm not shure whether the players can cope with
that but it would be nice if everything looked "normal".
I
Hello
On 19 Dec 2011, at 08:38, "C.Flothow" wrote:
> Am 18.12.2011 23:04, schrieb James:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 18 December 2011 21:19, C.Flothow wrote:
>>> The following turned up when I tried to print out the part of the first
>>> violin in a Christmas piece. I'm not shure whether the players
"Andrew Wood" writes:
> I am receiving lily pond questions and answers. I do not wish to have
> these emails sent to me anymore. How can I remove my email address
> from the list?
You'll find the list server address in the footer of each mail. And if
you ask your mail reader to show you the fu
Róbert Kohányi writes:
>> you should have read more carefully what David wrote (and thought
> about it):
>
> In my first message I wrote that "If I change "e,:1.7.10^3" to
> "e,:1.7.10-^3" I get the desired output." So this isn't *exactly* the
> issue, but David's solution isn't exactly right to
On 19 December 2011 09:38, C.Flothow wrote:
>
> I had read all that and I still don't see anything there that helps with my
> problem!
> BTW I consider the behavior of lilypond as something of a bug.
Isn't that an instance of issue #1410 ?
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1410
Hi,
this is my very first usage of lilypond, and unfortunately I would like to
use it for very uncommon and unclassical notation. I am pretty sure I can
do it, but I will surely need much time for finding how to do. Most certainly
some wizzard can quickly give to me a template. Most probably I wi
Hi Thomas,
I can't give you a template for that, although I'm sure it can all be
done nicely in LilyPond.
Just one word of advice: don't try to do this kind of advanced stuff if
you haven't used LilyPond before. Go for the common and "classical"
(even if it's rather popular music) first. I don't s
Hi Thomas,
> I want to write something according to the following rules:
>
> * two staves (piano-style, bass and treble);
> * no time signature;
> * only successive very-large-arpeggios (~ 10 notes each)
>starting from left hand (bass staff) and ending at the right hand
>(treble staff)
On 19 Dec 2011, at 18:11, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>> I want to write something according to the following rules:
>>
>> * two staves (piano-style, bass and treble);
>> * no time signature;
>> * only successive very-large-arpeggios (~ 10 notes each)
>> starting from left hand (ba
Hello,
On 19 December 2011 17:27, Thomas Baruchel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is my very first usage of lilypond, and unfortunately I would like to
> use it for very uncommon and unclassical notation.
> I am pretty sure I can
> do it, but I will surely need much time for finding how to do. Most
> certa
Using your idea I created a function that allows me to adjust the text
offset for each instrument since it proved to be different. Using this is a
little bit ugly since you are adding text above a pause that can be in very
different positions. but it gives a decent output.
divStaff = #(define-musi
Hi, is there some way to write splayed stems? (I don't know if this is the
correct name, but it is how Finale name it)
The best I could do so far is this:
\relative g''' {
\once \override Stem #'rotation = #'(45 0 0)
\once \override Stem #'X-offset = #2
\once \override Stem #'Y-offset =
Hello,
On 19 December 2011 20:14, Caio Barros wrote:
> Hi, is there some way to write splayed stems? (I don't know if this is the
> correct name, but it is how Finale name it)
We have a snippet =
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
'Complex Chord'.
Seems to be similar to what you have alr
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Here's a start — hope it helps.
Thank you. This was really a great help. After one hour of work, I am very
close to what I was expecting. I found mani indications thanks to the good
documentation of lilypond.
However, though I figured out how to rem
Hi all,
Working with overrides of nested properties, I run into an interesting
problem.
Both overrides of 'color produce the same result, but the override of
'bound-details set to the lambda expression does nothing. I've noticed
this with other attempted overrides of nested properties such as
'b
As i found the snippet :
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=326
beautiful and useful, i have a little proposition to improve it.
With the current snippet, you have to do 2 versions: a layout version and
a midi version (using \tag).
By using this little function below (inspired from :
http://
On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:14 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Working with overrides of nested properties, I run into an interesting
> problem.
>
> Both overrides of 'color produce the same result, but the override of
> 'bound-details set to the lambda expression does nothing. I've notice
Thanks. It is close indeed
In these cases of non traditional notation one has to spend a lot of time
adjusting the sizes and positions of things, but that's expected I suppose.
The problem with my example is that if the size of the measure changes for
any reason I have to redo all the parameters.
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:20 PM, m...@apollinemike.com <
m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
>
> It's a limitation of override. You'd have to override bound-details with
> a function and then build the entire a-list. Unfortunately,
> nested-properties do not evaluate functions for overrides.
Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
> > We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
> Thanks. It is close indeed.
You might want to omit the extra splayed stem. The chord is
still ugly, but draws less attention to its ugliness.
\relative g''' { < ges! g! \tweak #'X-offset #1.2 a>4 e d
Hi,
2011/12/19 Thomas Baruchel :
>
> However, though I figured out how to remove the start bar by using:
> \remove "System_start_delimiter_engraver"
> I still have the SystemStartBrace. Is there an easy way of removing it?
try:
\version "2.14.2"
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\ne
On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Caio Barros gmail.com> writes:
>>> We have a snippet http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
>> Thanks. It is close indeed.
>
> You might want to omit the extra splayed stem. The chord is
> still ugly, but draws less attention to its ugliness.
23 matches
Mail list logo
