On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:37 AM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> See https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1191
>
> HTH,
> Harm
>
Thank you.
--
Knute Snortum
Am Mo., 12. Mai 2025 um 01:28 Uhr schrieb Knute Snortum :
>
> Hello again, LlilyPonders.
>
> I think I have discovered an unreported bug in both 2.24.4 and 2.25.26, but
> I'd like to run it past y'all first.
>
> If you set tieWaitForNote, the inner ties ca
Hello again, LlilyPonders.
I think I have discovered an unreported bug in both 2.24.4 and 2.25.26, but
I'd like to run it past y'all first.
If you set tieWaitForNote, the inner ties cannot be changed with the \shape
command. The outer tie works as expected. Here's a MWE:
I am trying to change the shape of two ties after tieWaitForNote is set to
true. If I use the \shape command, the second tie is not affected. Here
is an MWE:
%%%
\version "2.24.4"
tieShapeA = \shape #'((0 . -1) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) \etc
tieShapeB = \shape #'((0 . 1) (0
: tieWaitForNote
Am 24.11.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek:
> Everything is correct except that the ties do not appear. What is my
error?
If you really want these note length values you need a << >> construct but
without \\ because that would create new Voices. The only new Voice
d is the one for the rest because LilyPond cannot put a r8 and a
g4. to the same stem (that’s what it tries if you use << >> without \\).
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c {
\key e \minor
\time 6/8
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\tieDown
<<
\new Voice { \
Hwaen Ch'uqi,
Thank you for your reply. I shall try your suggestion.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Hwaen Ch'uqi [mailto:hwaench...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek
Cc: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote
Greeting
?
Something like
\relative c'' {
\key e \minor
\clef treble
\time 6/8
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
g,8~ b~ d~ 4. }
And then manipulate ties individually if needed?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 11/24/15, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Everything is correct except that the
Hello,
Everything is correct except that the ties do not appear. What is my error?
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c'' {
\clef treble
\key e \minor
\time 6/8
<< {b8\rest s \set tieWaitForNote = ##t d,~ } \\
{\se
> Werner, any suggestions for _not_ using a tie in that manner?
For me, a tie lengthens a time value of a given pitch; it has no other
meaning.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
Malte Meyn writes:
> Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
>>> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
>>> inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
>>
>> That would not m
Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs
Urs Liska writes:
> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
> inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs in violin music
are only necessary when you c
t;> }
>>> \new Voice {
>>> \voiceTwo
>>> c''2 ( b'4 )
>>> }
>>> >>
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>> +1!
>>
>> I've played songs on the piano that have this feel, but I agree th
;
>> }
>>
>>
> +1!
>
> I've played songs on the piano that have this feel, but I agree that
> something like this should most likely done with multiple voices (and
> LilyPond handles it much better anyway).
>
> If this *is* necessary, do you really have *that many*
e played songs on the piano that have this feel, but I agree that
something like this should most likely done with multiple voices (and
LilyPond handles it much better anyway).
If this *is* necessary, do you really have *that many* instances where a
manual direction tweak is prohibitive, like the follo
}
>>
}
HTH
Urs
>
> Inline image 1
> http://lilybin.com/5sfp1b/1
>
> \score{
> {
> \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
>
> c''2 \( ~ b'4 \) c''4
> c''2 ~ b'4 \( c''4 \)
> }
>
> \layout{}
&g
Any thoughts on avoiding these clashes without having to manually tweak all
the slurs?
[image: Inline image 1]
http://lilybin.com/5sfp1b/1
\score{
{
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
c''2 \( ~ b'4 \) c''4
c''2 ~
nother approach (actually, pretty much the same but with a different
naming scheme) would be
\version "2.17"
\language "english"
\layout {
\context {
\PianoStaff
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
tieWaitForNote = ##t
}
\context {
\Voice
\name "SubVoice"
Hi David,
> How about this one?
Amazing! Thanks.
> It's sort of fishy
What specifically is 'fishy' about it?
> but seemingly does the trick in this simple case.
Definitely. I don't think any of the other cases in this score will be any
different — if I run into any thing that your fishing d
t_ Voices.
>>
>> I've no idea how to solve that quandary.
>
> Thanks for trying… =(
How about this one? It's sort of fishy but seemingly does the trick in
this simple case.
\version "2.17"
\language "english"
\layout {
\context {
\PianoS
Voice = "xy" { \upper_notes }
\new Staff = "piano_lower" \lower_notes
>>
\layout {
\context {
\PianoStaff
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
tieWaitForNote = ##t
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
;
> \language "english"
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \PianoStaff
> \consists #Span_stem_engraver
> tieWaitForNote = ##t
> }
> }
>
> upper_notes = \relative d'' {
> <<
> { \voiceOne r8 8[-. a'-. e']-. a2-. }
\consists #Span_stem_engraver
tieWaitForNote = ##t
}
}
upper_notes = \relative d'' {
<<
{ \voiceOne r8 8[-. a'-. e']-. a2-. }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo s8 \crossStaff { 2.. } }
>>
}
lower_notes = \relative d, {
\clef bass
\tuplet 7/4 { \stemUp d32[ ~
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Robin Bannister wrote:
> From: Robin Bannister
> Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "lilypond-user"
>
> Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 1:02 AM
> Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
> > I see a
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I see a "cross-staff" property for grobs
But this doesn't mean that every sort of grob has it, or uses it.
The file define-grob-properties.scm lists about a dozen grobs which do:
Beam, Stem, Slur, TupletBracket, among others, but not TieColumn.
So your TieColumn
ss
is what you normally want to avoid staff collisions).
I see a "cross-staff" property for grobs, but it's internal. Any advice?
-Jonathan
\version "2.12.2"
\score { <<
\new Staff = "RH" {
\relative c' {
s4
%
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Robin Bannister wrote:
> From: Robin Bannister
> Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "lilypond-user"
>
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 6:28 PM
> Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > I tried fooling
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I tried fooling around with tieWaitForNote
You didn't show your code, so it's not easy to guess what you tried.
I have no cross-staff experience, but it looks to me like
the cross-staff run is a lot better supported than
the cross-staff chord (where y
Hello,
Is there a way to get the attached notation in Lilypond? I tried
fooling around with tieWaitForNote but it seems the ties set in the rh
keeping on waiting, and waiting, and waiting...
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Richard Wattenbarger wrote:
the d-flat tie doesn't render in the upper voice
When you ask for tieWaitForNote like this, it gets turned on for the voice
and doesn't affect any other voices, e.g. a voice for the right hand.
The << {} // {} >> construct needs two voic
time 4/4
\clef bass
\key aes \major
\relative c, {
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\slurUp
%this works fine
r16 es~ (bes'~ g'~)
I need to either use a \new Voice or put some of the notes in another line (which also doesn't work.)Any suggestions? Thanks,Vivian.%% This doesn't work.\grace{\set tieWaitForNote = ##t\stemDown \tieUp f'''16~[ \tieDown e~ b~ \change Staff = "lh" \stemUp \tieUp bes,
tieWaitForNote bug
LilyPond 2.8.1 installed with GUB on Debian Linux
Using \set tieWaitForNote, which allows for ties between arpeggios and a
following chord, some ties are not attached to or do not extend to the
correct note.
--- begin LilyPond code ---
version "2.8.1"
\layout { ra
Tie Anomaly
LilyPond 2.8.0 on Debian Linux, installed using the GUB
There seems to be an anomaly with ties when using the \set
tieWaitForNote feature, in version 2.8.0. I noticed this anomaly when I
was trying to manually format a tie column between a grace-note arpeggio
and the following chord
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
> Datum: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:05:29 +0200
>
> According to the ChangeLog, this feature was introduced
> in version 2.4.5 so it isn't available in 2.4.4.
>
> /Mats
>
> Martin Bergande wrot
s,
Martin
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Martin Bergande" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kopie: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700
On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
using
ROTECTED]>
> Kopie: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote
> Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700
>
>
> On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
>
> > using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to "\set tieWaitForNote = ##t" but the
> > program
&g
On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote:
using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to "\set tieWaitForNote = ##t" but the
program
seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody
give me
a hint how to solve this problem?
Are you sure that tieWaitForNote exists in 2
Dear all,
using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to "\set tieWaitForNote = ##t" but the program
seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody give me
a hint how to solve this problem?
Thanks for answering in advance,
Martin
--
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen P
I'm using windows ME, and have still made no headway with \set
tieWaitForNote.
Sacha
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sacha Standen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: set
What OS and package type are you using? I just tried it on 2.5.30
compiled on
OSX, and I get all the ties.
Cheers,
- Graham
On 14-Jun-05, at 9:52 AM, Sacha Standen wrote:
I'm having problems on version 2.4.3 and on version 2.5.29 with
the command: \set tieWaitForNote. I've tri
I'm having problems on version 2.4.3 and on version
2.5.29 with the command: \set tieWaitForNote. I've tried various syntax and have
tried entering the example given in the manual (5.1.12), but the final note of
the arpeggio is always the only one to be tied.
This is the te
43 matches
Mail list logo
