On Monday March 15 2004 05:06, you wrote:
> > I meant notated and was thinking something along the lines of stacked
> > dynamics like lyric stanzas (or like you were mentioning) might be a way
> > it is professionally done; I was guessing. Is there a LilyPond way?
>
> Lookup the section on text m
Hello list, hello Kili,
You wrote:
> I'v even seen a piano sheet with a crescendo on a single half note chord,
> at tempo allegretto.
>
> Technically, that's of course complete nonsense.
This is not quite correct:
The speciality at good piano playing is not the real sound in the air,
but the sou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is \midge{#midge syntax} a possibility? The developers should talk
> to each other. I have never seen or heard of two projects so
> complementary, since midge is midi only. daveA
I myself am focusing on notation. You're welcome to implement
something yourself, though
[Little bit offtopic]
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:40:07AM -0500, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> [...] How could fp or pf mean the same thing on guitar
> or piano as it does on arci or winds?
I'v even seen a piano sheet with a crescendo on a single half note chord,
at tempo allegretto.
Technically,
On Friday 12 March 2004 23:57, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> On Friday March 12 2004 12:01, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Friday 12 March 2004 10:20, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > > David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
[snip--difficult to tell what's off list now, with the delay]
Mozart used fp a l
>> Don't talk nonsense! The notation fp is common in lots of music
>> should be performed similarly to fz and sfz (exactly how it should
>> be performed depends on when the music was written and may also
>> vary from composer to composer.
>
>I went to HDM, and it says "loud, followed by soft". I h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I went to HDM, and it says "loud, followed by soft". I have only
> seen it at the beginning of a repeated section, before the first note,
> where the sense I gave it is perfectly clear. You may have seen
> it often in the sense of sfz, but I have not. Clearly sfz is
>
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the first
time and at the next level the second time?
fp is common, and I
On Friday 12 March 2004 10:20, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> >>On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >>>On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> I
Do you mean how it should be notated or how to get it in the MIDI output
from LilyPond?
For the notation, I usually write it like
1x f
2x p
below the staff, at least when I write it in by hand in an orchestral
part. I'm not sure if I have seen it in printed scores, though.
/Mats
Edward Sanford
At 09:53 AM 3/12/2004, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> > > Is there a preferred way to have two dif
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
section of
>> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
>> > > Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
>> > > section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the
>> > > first time and
On Friday 12 March 2004 01:48, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> > > Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> > > section of music to indi
On Thursday 11 March 2004 23:46, Paul Scott wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> >> Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> >>section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the
> >> first ti
On Wednesday March 10 2004 12:23, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> > Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> > section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the first
> > time and at the next le
On Saturday 06 March 2004 02:53, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote:
> Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a
> section of music to indicate that it is played at one level the first
> time and at the next level the second time?
fp is common, and I've seen pf. I've never seen
Is there a preferred way to have two different dynamics in a section of
music to indicate that it is played at one level the first time and at the
next level the second time?
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailm
18 matches
Mail list logo
