On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 2:08 PM Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
>
> p.s.
>
> > Does \afterBreak not work with OttavaBracket.padding?
>
> um… \alterBroken (as in the snippet).
> Sorry! — K
>
> > \relative {
> > \alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
> > \ottava 1 c1 \break
> > c2 2
> > }
On 11/6/21, 3:24 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Lukas-Fabian Moser"
wrote:
> \relative {
>\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
>\ottava 1 c1 \break
> c2 2
> }
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
Hi Lukas,
> I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations
I generally remove them — I’m on the crusade with you! — tho’ on this
“fast-cut-and-paste job”, I didn’t. =(
That being said, there are certain circumstances in which I prefer keeping the
hashes, as they (IMO) help re
On 2021-11-06 2:45 pm, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Since #'(1 7) is a list of numbers, you could write it this way:
\relative {
\alterBroken padding 1,7 Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
Right, thanks! I had a feeling there was a way to do this using dak's
syntax
Since #'(1 7) is a list of numbers, you could write it this way:
\relative {
\alterBroken padding 1,7 Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
Right, thanks! I had a feeling there was a way to do this using dak's
syntax enhancements but couldn't remember what it wa
On 2021-11-06 2:23 pm, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
\relative {
\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
found so daunting when I learned LilyPond and which are needed much
less
\relative {
\alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
\ottava 1 c1 \break
c2 2
}
I continue my lonely crusade against the hash-tick-combinations that I
found so daunting when I learned LilyPond and which are needed much less
often today:
\relative {
\alterBroken pad
Le 06/11/2021 à 22:01, Knute Snortum a écrit :
Hello again,
I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
the second line, but not the first.
I know you can do something like this with the \shape
p.s.
> Does \afterBreak not work with OttavaBracket.padding?
um… \alterBroken (as in the snippet).
Sorry! — K
> \relative {
> \alterBroken #'padding #'(1 7) Staff.OttavaBracket
> \ottava 1 c1 \break
> c2 2
> }
Hi Knute,
> I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
> bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
> the second line, but not the first.
Does \afterBreak not work with OttavaBracket.padding?
\relative {
\alterBroken #'
Hello again,
I have a situation where I need to adjust the padding of an ottava
bracket after a line break. That is, I want to affect the bracket on
the second line, but not the first.
I know you can do something like this with the \shape function, but
what about brackets?
I tried this solution
Got it! Thanks for your patience with me!
Ken
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:07 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 02/11/2021 à 00:00, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
> > Hi Jean;
> >
> >Thanks for the tip.
> >
> >I'm using Lilypond 2.22.1.
> >
> >I now have the attava bracket beneath the notes us
Le 02/11/2021 à 00:00, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
Hi Jean;
Thanks for the tip.
I'm using Lilypond 2.22.1.
I now have the attava bracket beneath the notes using " \override
Staff.OttavaBracket.direction = #DOWN"
BTW, I'm looking at the NR for 2.22.1 and I see "ottava #X" where,
appa
; is no longer needed.
Is it possible that this is the old notation prior to 2.22.1 (like
2.18?) that did not get updated or is the "#" just optional now?
Thanks,
Ken
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:46 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 01/11/2021 à 23:20, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
>
Le 01/11/2021 à 23:20, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
How to force the placement of the ottava bracket to be below the
notes? (or above?)
Below: just \override the direction. Above: prior
to version 2.23.3, you had to use the lesser known
\overrideProperty (see
https://gitlab.com/lilypond
Hi;
How to force the placement of the ottava bracket to be below the
notes? (or above?)
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
Thanks, Jean; I'll continue to experiment.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:13 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 12/08/2021 à 00:11, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
> > Sorry, did not reply-all :-(
> >
> > No, I did not upgrade. I thought you stated that I had two choices:
> > one command that would work with
Le 12/08/2021 à 00:11, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
Sorry, did not reply-all :-(
No, I did not upgrade. I thought you stated that I had two choices:
one command that would work with 2.33 and the other one which will
work with 2.23.
Yes (but I think you meant 2.22, not 2.33).
\overrideProperty wil
Sorry, did not reply-all :-(
No, I did not upgrade. I thought you stated that I had two choices:
one command that would work with 2.33 and the other one which will
work with 2.23.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:10 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> No, I did not upgrade. I thought you stated that I had tw
Le 11/08/2021 à 23:57, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
Thanks, Jean!
However, I see no change in the pdf output and I get no errors or warnings.
I saw this command in Notation reference, and had tried it already. I
thought perhaps I had not used the correct syntax.
So I tried copy&paste from your e
g 11, 2021 at 2:36 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 11/08/2021 à 23:30, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
> > Hi All;
> >
> >I'm using Lilypond 2.22 on a Mac.
> >
> >How to force the ottava bracket to go above the notes in a Piano piece?
> >
> >T
Le 11/08/2021 à 23:30, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit :
Hi All;
I'm using Lilypond 2.22 on a Mac.
How to force the ottava bracket to go above the notes in a Piano piece?
The ottava bracket is not clear when placed in between the clefs; I
suppose I could make it bold face...
The
Hi All;
I'm using Lilypond 2.22 on a Mac.
How to force the ottava bracket to go above the notes in a Piano piece?
The ottava bracket is not clear when placed in between the clefs; I
suppose I could make it bold face...
The notes are still within the treble staff.
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
> I think that the problem with the bracket I just described is a bug
> or a feature that should be enhanced...
Vertical alignment of cross-staff material is partially broken, yes,
from the very beginning. Search for
cross AND staff AND status:Accepted
in the issue tracker.
Werner
between ottava bracket and stems in cross-staff systems
Hello Kieren,
unfortunately this method is trial and error as well. In fact, I can't use the
same shorten-pair value if the stem is up or down, and (maybe) if the notehead
has different sizes...
I think that the problem wit
Hi Paolo,
> unfortunately this method is trial and error as well.
Not if it’s a callback function. ;) You need to write code that determines how
much to shorten/extend (by referencing the width of noteheads, etc.), and
automatically applies the tweak. That’s how you make it not trial-and-error.
ult might
> be.
>
> Hope that helps!
> Kieren.
>
>
> > -- Original Message --
> > From: Paolo Pr
> > Date: December 8, 2019 at 6:40 PM
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > in cross-staff systems, I see that the ottava br
M
>
>
> Hello,
>
> in cross-staff systems, I see that the ottava bracket can produce an unwanted
> collision between the "8va" string and the stems. Please, look at:
>
> http://lilybin.com/vf4vaj/1
>
> Is there a way to automatically avoid that, without using t
On 2019-12-08 3:40 pm, Paolo Pr wrote:
Hello,
in cross-staff systems, I see that the ottava bracket can produce an
unwanted collision between the "8va" string and the stems. Please, look
at:
http://lilybin.com/vf4vaj/1
Is there a way to automatically avoid that, without using the
Hello,
in cross-staff systems, I see that the ottava bracket can produce an
unwanted collision between the "8va" string and the stems. Please, look at:
http://lilybin.com/vf4vaj/1
Is there a way to automatically avoid that, without using the
trial-and-error method for adjusting the
On 21.08.2018 19:13, Pierre Perol-Schneider wrote:
As you can see, a stem whiteout would also affect staff and beam.
This I have to correct: normally, one can always find an arrangement so
that the whiteout affects exactly those parts you want it to. In this case:
\version "2.19.82"
rD = { \
PianoStaff
<<
\new Staff= "right" { \right }
\new Staff = "left" { \left } >>
}
As you can see, a stem whiteout would also affect staff and beam.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le mar. 21 août 2018 à 18:54, Stefan Thomas a
écrit :
> Dear Pierre,
> thanks for Your an
Dear Pierre,
thanks for Your answer. Can I also achieve the opposite? Can the stem
whiteout the ottava-bracket?
Am Di., 21. Aug. 2018 um 18:31 Uhr schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> How about:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
re
Le mar. 21 août 2018 à 18:03, Stefan Thomas a
écrit :
> Dear community,
> I tried to whiteout an ottava bracket, but without success. Does someone
> know, how to do this?
>
>> Thanks for Your help!
>>
> \version "2.18.2"
> rD = { \change Staff = right
Dear community,
I tried to whiteout an ottava bracket, but without success. Does someone
know, how to do this?
> Thanks for Your help!
>
\version "2.18.2"
rD = { \change Staff = right \stemDown }
lU = { \change Staff = left \stemUp }
right = \relative b'''
2017-09-08 23:33 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Simon Albrecht writes:
>
>> On 08.09.2017 22:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
at = #(define-music-function (time event music)
(ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?)
"Place @var{event} at a relative duration @var{time
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 08.09.2017 22:58, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> at = #(define-music-function (time event music)
>>>(ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?)
>>> "Place @var{event} at a relative duration @var{time} in relation
>>> to @var{music}."
>>>#{ \contex
On 08.09.2017 22:58, David Kastrup wrote:
Thomas Morley writes:
at = #(define-music-function (time event music)
(ly:duration? ly:music? ly:music?)
"Place @var{event} at a relative duration @var{time} in relation
to @var{music}."
#{ \context Bottom << { \skip $time <>$event } $music >> #}
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2017-09-08 12:15 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>> 2017-09-07 20:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Schmaus :
>>
>>> So anyway, except for writing a music function that basically does
>>> the ottava voiding + spacer grace + ottava reset in one go, I don't
>>> have any other solution as well.
2017-09-08 12:15 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2017-09-07 20:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Schmaus :
>
>> So anyway, except for writing a music function that basically does the
>> ottava voiding + spacer grace + ottava reset in one go, I don't have any
>> other solution as well.
>
> Quick'n dirty:
>
> {
>
2017-09-07 20:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Schmaus :
> So anyway, except for writing a music function that basically does the ottava
> voiding + spacer grace + ottava reset in one go, I don't have any other
> solution as well.
Quick'n dirty:
{
\ottava 1
c'''4 4 4
\afterGrace 4 \ottava 0
\ottava
Right ... now that you mention it, your topic *was* "break in a ottava
bracket", so careful reading could have told me too what you're after.
So anyway, except for writing a music function that basically does the ottava
voiding + spacer grace + ottava reset in one go, I don&#
Oops, I guess I forgot to specify what kind of break I meant... I don't
mean a line break, but stopping the current bracket and starting a new
one. Without the grace spacer, the two brackets are merged into one.
On 09/07/17 18:42, Robert Schmaus wrote:
Hi,
I can't imagine there's any problem
Hi,
I can't imagine there's any problem at all with having a \break within
an "ottava-zone". have you tried it?
and should it be obvious what the grace spacer is for?
Best,
Robert
Am 07.09.17 um 18:01 schrieb Caagr98:
I currently do it with the code below. It works, but it feels wrong. Is
I currently do it with the code below. It works, but it feels wrong. Is
there some better way to do it?
```
\ottava 1
c'''4 4 4 4
\ottava 0
\grace s32
\ottava 1
d'''4 4 4 4
\ottava 0
```
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lis
On 25.07.2017 21:19, arnepe wrote:
how about putting the ottavas in a separate variable, see attached file ...
Sometimes, it’s not the best thing to use Nabble to post on this list,
because in normal environments, your attachment does not show up…
Best, Simon
___
how about putting the ottavas in a separate variable, see attached file ...
cheers
Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/How-to-break-continuous-ottava-bracket-tp204648p204663.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Karol Majewski writes:
> Hi, how to break ottava bracket beteween bars? The following gives me one
> continuous bracket
>
> \ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
> \ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
I am sort-of annoyed since I answered this question but see no evidence
in my sent folder or
#x27;1 \ottava #0 \bar "||"
> \ottava #1 c''1 ^"example 3"
> d''1 \ottava #0 \bar "||"
>
> }
>
> And here continuous ottava bracket looks stupid, doesn't it?
>
> Is there more elegant way to break it? spacer rest does the job, but this
&
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 16:57 +0200, Karol Majewski wrote:
> OK, got an idea:
>
> \ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
> \ottava #1 \set Staff.ottavation = #"8va" c'1 \ottava #0
>
>
> It's not 100% elegant, but aceptable, I think.
>
You still have multiple \ottava at the same moment, which do nothing.
\ot
endent bars in one line:
> > And here continuous ottava bracket looks stupid, doesn't it?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Is there more elegant way to break it? spacer rest does the job, but
> this solution is a bit artificial.
>
> Unfortunately, null spacers (e.g., s2*0) don'
OK, got an idea:
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
\ottava #1 \set Staff.ottavation = #"8va" c'1 \ottava #0
It's not 100% elegant, but aceptable, I think.
--Karol
2017-07-25 16:06 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
> On 25.07.2017 16:00, Karol Majewski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
Hi, how to break ottava bracket beteween bars? The following gives me one
continuous bracket
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
--Karol
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
Hi Karol,
> Sometimes you want to have two independent bars in one line:
> And here continuous ottava bracket looks stupid, doesn't it?
Yes.
> Is there more elegant way to break it? spacer rest does the job, but this
> solution is a bit artificial.
Unfortunately, null sp
Sometimes you want to have two independent bars in one line:
{
c'1 ^"example 1"
d'1 \bar "||"
\ottava #1 c''1 ^"example 2"
d''1 \ottava #0 \bar "||"
\ottava #1 c''1 ^"example 3"
d''1 \ottava #0 \
On 25.07.2017 16:00, Karol Majewski wrote:
Hi, how to break ottava bracket beteween bars? The following gives me
one continuous bracket
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
The bracket is continuous because the ottavation is continuous – there
is no moment when the
Hi, how to break ottava bracket beteween bars? The following gives me one
continuous bracket
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
\ottava #1 c'1 \ottava #0
--Karol
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
Urs,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:36 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Urs,
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>> I'm trying to style an ottava bracket. But poking around in the IR
>> doesn't show me the way how to make the right vertical line look
Urs,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> I'm trying to style an ottava bracket. But poking around in the IR
> doesn't show me the way how to make the right vertical line look like
> the horizontal line (in the attached image).
>
> What property d
> But I have to say they are pretty much unrelated
Sorry, Urs, you're right. I asked that question in some thread back then
and just assumed and answer was in there. I don't know any more about it.
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
Thanks for the links. But I have to say they are pretty much unrelated
to my question of changing the vertical edge line (this includes that
the linked discussions don't say anything about this *not* being possible).
So it seems like I'll have to go and create a completely custom stencil
to custom
And the link:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/99637
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
o get these messages, there are more details by Pierre and David. I
can't open them:
12 Feb 2015 18:23 Noeck Dotted ottava bracket
13 Feb 2015 12:07 Pierre Perol-Schneider Re: Dotted ottava bracket
13 Feb 2015 16:26 David Nalesnik Re: Dotted ottava bracket
Cheers,
Jor
Hi Urs,
Am 15.02.2017 um 18:03 schrieb Urs Liska:
> I'm trying to style an ottava bracket. But poking around in the IR
> doesn't show me the way how to make the right vertical line look like
> the horizontal line (in the attached image).
I am not sure, I understand what you m
I'm trying to style an ottava bracket. But poking around in the IR
doesn't show me the way how to make the right vertical line look like
the horizontal line (in the attached image).
What property do I have to override here?
TIA
Urs
___
lil
hat the manual says this is what should happen but isn't
> this
> > strange? Sorry if the question is naif.
> >
> > Thank you, g.
>
>
> I don't think this is strange at all. You write the pitch you intend
> to hear, and the ottava bracket shifts its no
but it also shifts the notes
> one lower octave. So to avoid the shift I also had to specify a \transpose.
> I have seen that the manual says this is what should happen but isn't this
> strange? Sorry if the question is naif.
>
> Thank you, g.
I don't think this is stra
I'm editing a score where I would like to specify "8va".
If I write
\version "2.19.52"
{
\ottava #1
a b
}
lilypond creates a score with the text 8va but it also shifts the notes
one lower octave. So to avoid the shift I also had to specify a \transpose. I
have seen that the manual says
Apologies, there’s a spurious override later in the code that I had not
remembered. My fault.
Andrew
> On 10 Oct 2015, at 22:07, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>
> On 10.10.2015 13:04, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>> It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its
>> o
On 10.10.2015 13:04, Andrew Bernard wrote:
It is as though the ottava bracket ignores changes to its
outside-staff-priority
It’s probably simple as that: Ottava_spanner_engraver lives in Staff, so
you need to \override Staff.OttavaBracket.
Yours, Simon
I thought you can do this sort of thing with an ordering: 2< 3. But I have to
use 401 > 400, where 400 is the setting for the ottava bracket. I don’t have to
do this for other sorts of objects. It is as though the ottava bracket ignores
changes to its outside-staff-priority, unless I a
Il giorno sab 10 ott 2015 alle 11:58, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the
outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet
bracket priority is greater than 400, which is the default for the
ottava bracket. I thought
I want to put an ottava bracket inside a tuplet bracket. Using the
outside-staff-priority parameter, this will only work if the tuplet bracket
priority is greater than 400, which is the default for the ottava bracket. I
thought that it was a matter of numerical ordering to do this, not absolute
Abraham,
Brilliant. Thank you.
It’s against all the engraving rules, but it’s exactly what I need.
Andrew
On 19 May 2015 at 16:29:54, tisimst (tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com) wrote:
Not sure if this helps you, too, but it seems your example might could benefit
from the following:
\override Staff
stemUp
\ottava #1
c8 d e f
}
\score {
\new Staff { \treble }
\layout { }
}
- Abraham
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n176764...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> How can the ottava bracket in this snippet be moved downwards? I have been
>
ode+s1069038n176764...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> How can the ottava bracket in this snippet be moved downwards? I have been
> able to get it under the beam, but now the stems seem to be in the way.
> Using extra-offset and Y-offset appears to have no effect on the position.
> The result we
8n176764...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> How can the ottava bracket in this snippet be moved downwards? I have been
> able to get it under the beam, but now the stems seem to be in the way.
> Using extra-offset and Y-offset appears to have no effect on the position.
> The result we are
How can the ottava bracket in this snippet be moved downwards? I have been able
to get it under the beam, but now the stems seem to be in the way. Using
extra-offset and Y-offset appears to have no effect on the position. The result
we are seeking is to have the ottawa bracket under the tall
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joram,
>
> Two things :
> 1) Ottava_spanner_engraver is part of the Staff context, see :
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/internals/ottava_005fspanner_005fengraver
> 2) for som
\override #'(thickness . 2)
\override #'(off . 0.01)
\draw-dotted-line #'(10 . 0)
}
a'' a'' a''
\ottava 0
}
HTH,
Pierre
2015-02-12 19:23 GMT+01:00 Noeck :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to change the ottava bracket style. The ma
Hi,
I would like to change the ottava bracket style. The markup line on top shows
what I want, the dashed ottava bracket is the closest I could achieve. However,
I want it to look like the dotted line on top.
\version "2.18.2"
{
\override Score.OttavaBracket #'style = #'do
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Noeck wrote:
> Am 24.12.2013 00:30, schrieb Noeck:
>> can I make the vertical line of an ottava bracket solid while keeping
>> the dashed style of the horizontal line?
>
> Should I count that as: This is impossible?
> Joram
This is probab
Am 24.12.2013 00:30, schrieb Noeck:
> can I make the vertical line of an ottava bracket solid while keeping
> the dashed style of the horizontal line?
Should I count that as: This is impossible?
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypon
Hi,
can I make the vertical line of an ottava bracket solid while keeping
the dashed style of the horizontal line?
A bit like this:
8va _ _ _ _
|
but with a solid top right corner.
TIA
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Just a thought:
You can have a Staff (or Voice) accept ChordNames. If you managed to do
something like this
\new Staff <<
\new Voice \chords
\new Voice \melody
>>
where the melody voice is (a copy of) the voice containing the ottavas,
and then make all staff symbols and the melody voice tran
>
> I'm guessing you need to \consist only the top Staff context, and set the
> #'outside-staff-priority appropriately.
>
> Hope this helps!
> Kieren.
>
I don't think, this will work, because the top line is not a staff but
ChordNames and I did not get this to work. I already tried the
outsi
\context {
>> \Score
>> \consists "Ottava_spanner_engraver"
>> }
>> }
>>
>> but it does not work.
>
> That's what I tried, too - with the same result: It remove the ottava
> bracket on staff level, but does not add it on the sc
\Score
>> \consists "Ottava_spanner_engraver"
>>}
>> }
>>
>> but it does not work.
>
> That's what I tried, too - with the same result: It remove the ottava
> bracket on staff level, but does not add it on the score level.
&g
nner_engraver"
> }
> }
>
> but it does not work.
That's what I tried, too - with the same result: It remove the ottava
bracket on staff level, but does not add it on the score level.
I would also be interested in a solution.
Cheers,
Joram
__
Nick Payne writes:
> I just encountered issue 1473 (ottavation marking in one voice affects
> all voices on the staff), and it took a bit of digging to find the
> solution (change Voice.middleCPosition in the other voices). Maybe there
> should be a short "Known issues and warnings" in the sec
I just encountered issue 1473 (ottavation marking in one voice affects
all voices on the staff), and it took a bit of digging to find the
solution (change Voice.middleCPosition in the other voices). Maybe there
should be a short "Known issues and warnings" in the section of the NR
dealing with
Hi,
2010/12/18 Orm Finnendahl :
> the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
> following example:
>
> \version "2.13.43"
>
> \new Staff { \relative c''' {
> \override OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #2000
Nick Payne writes:
> On 18/12/10 22:32, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
>> The OttavaBracket is a part of the Staff context, and music is in
>> the voice context - so you need:
>> Staff.OttavaBracket
>
> If OttavaBracket doesn't exist in the Voice context, shouldn't an
> error be generated in the log when t
On 18/12/10 22:32, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Orm Finnendahl"
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: ottava bracket and fingering
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\versio
- Original Message -
From: "Orm Finnendahl"
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: ottava bracket and fingering
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version "2.13.43"
\new Staff { \relati
On 18 December 2010 11:42, Orm Finnendahl
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
> following example:
>
> \version "2.13.43"
>
> \new Staff { \relative c''' {
> \override OttavaBracket #'
Hi,
the fingering of columns is placed outside the ottava bracket in the
following example:
\version "2.13.43"
\new Staff { \relative c''' {
\override OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #20
\override OttavaBracket #'staff-padding = #60
\over
On 9 August 2010 11:48, Ole Schmidt wrote:
>
> thanks- this explaines a little more the logic behind it- is there a
> point in the docs where I can find those things?
>
LM 4.4.3 Outside-staff objects
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/learning/outside_002dstaff-objects
and Internals Ref
thanks- this explaines a little more the logic behind it- is there a point in
the docs where I can find those things?
ole
Am 08.08.2010 um 23:12 schrieb Xavier Scheuer:
> On 8 August 2010 17:03, Ole Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to set the ottava bracket
On 8 August 2010 17:03, Ole Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to set the ottava bracket -- above the markups?
>
Hi!
Change the value of OttavaBracket #'outside-staff-priority to something
*strictly* higher than 450 (451 for example)
\override Staff.OttavaBracke
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
