Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-24 Thread Noeck
I am convinced ;) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-24 Thread Noeck
Am 24.01.2013 13:34, schrieb Marcos Press: > (if you use \times 6/8). > > > I asume here you are talking about \time and not \times (or future > \tuplet) function Yes, sorry, I meant a metre of 6/8 (so \time 6/8). I think we both agree, that we are looking forward to the \tuplet function (even

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-24 Thread Marcos Press
> With the hopefully-2.17.11 syntax this would be > > { > \time 6/8 > \tuplet 4/6 4. { e16 fis g gis a ais b b } > } > > Now this still is mathematics. It seems closer to the kind of > mathematics you'd use in music. Though I am not sure I'd not prefer > Well, calculating tuplets is much mor

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-24 Thread Marcos Press
Thanks Noeck! > #(ly:make-moment 6 8) produces separately grouped tuplets every 6/8 - > which is probably a full measure in your case (if you use \times 6/8). > I asume here you are talking about \time and not \times (or future \tuplet) function > In general, if you want to group tuplets after

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-24 Thread David Kastrup
Noeck writes: > #(ly:make-moment 6 8) produces separately grouped tuplets every 6/8 - > which is probably a full measure in your case (if you use \times 6/8). > In general, if you want to group tuplets after x/y, the function > #(ly:make-moment x y) will produce this duration. > > If you want the

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Noeck
Am 24.01.2013 05:56, schrieb Marcos Press: > Yes, because 1/3 is not the moment you want (I think). > Try > set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 6 8) > > > Actualy the moment I want would be the one that I can get with separated > \times. Like: > > \times 6/4 { e16[ fis

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Marcos Press
Interesting!, a way for simplifying things! But the confusion with tuplets, starts when I have to use then in non-regular \time or non-regular tuplets like my example that its both things at the same time. In a \time 4/4 or 2/4 its easy to grasp the use of a standard \times 2/3 But in a \time 6/8

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Marcos Press
Hi Kieren, > Yes, because 1/3 is not the moment you want (I think). > > Try > set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 6 8) > Actualy the moment I want would be the one that I can get with separated \times. Like: \times 6/4 { e16[ fis g gis] } \times 6/4 { a16[ ais b b] } But, wich wou

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Noeck writes: > Am 23.01.2013 15:51, schrieb David Kastrup: >> But with some luck, starting with >> 2.17.11, things might become more "natural" for you after >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3095>. > > Am I right, that the fraction argument for \tuplet is inverse to the > \

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Noeck
Am 23.01.2013 15:51, schrieb David Kastrup: > But with some luck, starting with > 2.17.11, things might become more "natural" for you after > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3095>. Am I right, that the fraction argument for \tuplet is inverse to the \times argument? So, usual

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Kieren MacMillan writes: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3095> > > OOO… very nice! Well, it is more or less one result from a heated discussion going awfully bad eventually last fall. Minus shorthands \duplet (?), \triplet, \quadruplet ... (that does not mean that they

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3095> OOO… very nice! Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread David Kastrup
Marcos Press writes: > Hi list! > I always have some problems with the tuplets, but generaly I end up > findig a solusion by my own. Today is not the day :) Kieren already made your day. But with some luck, starting with 2.17.11, things might become more "natural" for you after http://code.goog

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
p.s. That being said, in your example, there's no need to use \set tupletSpannerDuration. That's only useful for multiple tuplets, e.g.: \version "2.15.40" \score { \relative d'' { \clef G \time 6/8 \key a \major a2. \times 6/4 { e16[ fis g gis] a[ ais b b] } \times 6/4 { e,16[ fis

Re: more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Marcos, > Uncommenting the \set line produce extra spanner lines over the nexts bars. > And adding again the tuplet, adds nested spanners over the nexts bars. > I'm pretty sure the tuplet numbers are wrong and the SpannerDuration moments > are wrong too :) Yes, because 1/3 is not the moment

more Tuplets...

2013-01-23 Thread Marcos Press
Hi list! I always have some problems with the tuplets, but generaly I end up findig a solusion by my own. Today is not the day :) The problem is more with the spanner but I'm not sure the tuplet is configured correcly. Here, all seams ok. Compile with no error and perfect graphic with one spanner