> With the hopefully-2.17.11 syntax this would be
>
> {
> \time 6/8
> \tuplet 4/6 4. { e16 fis g gis a ais b b }
> }
>
> Now this still is mathematics. It seems closer to the kind of
> mathematics you'd use in music. Though I am not sure I'd not prefer
>
Well, calculating tuplets is much more mathematics than music :)
>
> {
> \time 6/8
> \tuplet 2/3 4. { e16[ fis] g[ gis] a[ ais] b[ b] }
> }
>
> instead, but admittedly, that has a slightly different accent structure.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
I think I'll prefer just a change of name of the function and making the
spanner an inside parameter to \tuplet and not to \time.
Thanks David for always been there!!!
And Thanks List!
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
