Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> writes: >> <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3095> > > OOOHHHH… very nice!
Well, it is more or less one result from a heated discussion going awfully bad eventually last fall. Minus shorthands \duplet (?), \triplet, \quadruplet ... (that does not mean that they might not arrive at some point of time, but they are not really what I felt important about ... wait, badly expressed). Plus getting the optional argument behavior shaken out in discussion and implementation -- I think it is now reasonably straightforward to understand in its implications. Embarrassingly low-hanging fruit, actually. Is there any LilyPond user who had not at one point of time fought with getting \times right? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
