Thank you, Phil and Mats, for your responses. It turns out you are correct;
the error is from having the pdf file open within MikTeX's pdf reader during
recompile.
I chose to use MikTeX because, when I tweak LaTeX(a typesetting language
very similar to LilyPond) files, I don't have to close, comp
Quoting Ambareesh Pandit :
I am attempting to use LilyPond in Windows XP with MikTeX but am getting the
following error:
C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/backend-library.scm:115:15: In
procedure delete-file in expression (delete-file pdf-name):
This looks as if you alr
applies in your case, though, since I
don't use MikTex.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Ambareesh Pandit
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:27 AM
Subject: Permission-denied error while using Lilypond 2.12 with MikTeX
I am attemptin
I am attempting to use LilyPond in Windows XP with MikTeX but am getting the
following error:
C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/backend-library.scm:115:15: In
procedure delete-file in expression (delete-file pdf-name):
C:/Program
Files/LilyPond/usr/share/lilypond/current/sc
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable)
and lilypond 2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my
system ? I'm always curious to try and test the l
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x
(stable) and lilypond 2.13.x (devel.) installed and
useable on my system ? I'm always curious to try and test
I added a se
nskeen wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable) and lilypond
>> 2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my system ? I'm always curious to
>> try and test the latest features and bugfixes, but for distribution and
I don't know about linux, but on macintosh, there's absolutely zero
problem, the binaries are all self-contained. It's just a matter of
calling the right one.
On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable)
Hi,
Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable) and lilypond
2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my system ? I'm always curious to
try and test the latest features and bugfixes, but for distribution and
sharing of lilypond sourcecode it is probably a better idea t
I don't object to a suitable Debian developer who wants to take over
maintenance of lilypond. They should contact me directly.
Thomas
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi all,
On 06/07/2009 03:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Wise a écrit :
>> It looks like lilypond is unmaintained in Debian, so that is unlikely
>> to happen until it gets a new maintainer or newly active maintainer.
>> CCing the maintainer, hopefully they will respond.
>
> It appe
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 07 juin 2009, vers
15:59, Gilles Filippini disait :
> It appears that lilypond is actively maintained in ubuntu[1].
> I'd like to take over this package in Debian but I don't know about the
> practices when a package is already maintained in U
Hi,
Paul Wise a écrit :
> It looks like lilypond is unmaintained in Debian, so that is unlikely
> to happen until it gets a new maintainer or newly active maintainer.
> CCing the maintainer, hopefully they will respond.
It appears that lilypond is actively maintained in ubuntu[1].
I'd like to tak
Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
Hi all,
On 06/07/2009 03:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
really don't want to take over the package without interaction with Thomas.
But I'm definitly interesting in helping out with this package, maybe in a team
as Vincent Bernat suggested in an other mail.
Maybe
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Johannes Schöpfer wrote:
> > hi,
>> > we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
>> > it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the
>>moment as
>> > it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have
>>gone
> hi,
> we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
> it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the
moment as
> it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have
gone dead.
> perhaps someone else can do a non-maintainer upload? i'm
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, rosea grammostola
wrote:
> Could someone fix Lilypond in Debian. There are also some people busy with
> packaging Frescobaldi for Debian, but it isn't possible to upload it without
> having Lilypond fixed and updated to the recent stable version.
It looks like li
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 16:56:39 schrieb Rob Canning:
> > hi,
> > we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
> > it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the mome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 16:56:39 schrieb Rob Canning:
> hi,
> we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
> it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the moment as
> it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have go
hi,
we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the moment as it
seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have gone dead.
perhaps someone else can do a non-maintainer upload? i'm not sure about the
ettiquette or debian p
Peter,
Are you referring to the apostrophe (or single-quote, if you will) just
before the 3rd opening parenthesis in the first line?
Ralph, it's worth a try. My XP init.el file doesn't contain this and it
loads lilypond-mode with no error messages. I'm not sure if there's a
difference betwee
> "David" == David Stocker writes:
David> If your LilyPond installation resides in /usr/local/ then that
David> should be correct.
David> Ralph Palmer wrote:
>> Getting close, I think - " So, the first line should actually read:
>>
>> (setq load-path (append (list
>> ("/usr/local/lilypond/u
Sure, Ralph. I'll do some digging and try to figure out what makes
lilypond-mode work in my installation.
In the meantime, check out:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Emacs-Beginner-HOWTO-3.html#ss3.1
if you haven't already, just for some background information on modes in
Emacs.
Email me off-list if
Dave -
Did what you said, as far as I could. Opened a .ly file, and got bounced.
Opened the file again with the --debug-init option, and got:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (invalid-function
"/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp")
("/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp")
(lis
If your LilyPond installation resides in /usr/local/ then that should be
correct.
Ralph Palmer wrote:
Getting close, I think -
"
So, the first line should actually read:
(setq load-path (append (list
("/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp")) load-path))
if "/usr/local/lilypond/usr/
Getting close, I think -
"
So, the first line should actually read:
(setq load-path (append (list
("/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp")) load-path))
if "/usr/local/lilypond/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp" is the (apparently
appropriate) result of a $locate on /emacs/site-lisp?
Ralph
On
In the file /init.el/ paste in the following lines:
(setq load-path (append (list (expand-file-name "~/emacs/site-lisp"))
load-path))
(autoload 'LilyPond-mode "lilypond-mode" "LilyPond Editing Mode" t)
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.ly$" . LilyPond-mode))
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("
Dave -
Okay, in home/rpalmer/, I've got a .emacs.d. The only thing that contains is
auto-save-list (a directory), which is empty. I'll create the init.el file
in ~/.emacs.d.
Ralph
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Does it make any/much/a significant difference tha
I don't think it should matter. Are the folder and file there?
Ralph Palmer wrote:
Dave,
Does it make any/much/a significant difference that I'm running 8.10?
I would think anything that worked under 8.04 should work under 8.10.
Ralph
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:23 AM, David Stocker
mailto:d
Dave,
Does it make any/much/a significant difference that I'm running 8.10? I
would think anything that worked under 8.04 should work under 8.10.
Ralph
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:23 AM, David Stocker
wrote:
> It shouldn't be this hard to set up lilypond-mode for emacs under Ubuntu
> 8.04.
>
> Ra
It shouldn't be this hard to set up lilypond-mode for emacs under Ubuntu
8.04.
Ralph, check in your home folder and see if there is a folder called
.emacs.d and if there is a file in that folder named init.el
It should be there. If not, create that file and folder. We're going to
get this wo
2009/3/4 Ralph Palmer :
> I tried M-x lilypond-mode, and got an emacs error message that lilypond-mode
> couldn't be found.
> Anyone have a suggestion?
Mmmh... jEdit?
OK, I'm out :)
Regards,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
Hmmm -
I tried M-x lilypond-mode, and got an emacs error message that lilypond-mode
couldn't be found.
I tried M-x LilyPond-mode, and got an emacs error message that lilypond-mode
file couldn't be opened.
Anyone have a suggestion?
Ralph
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
0;241;0cOn Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 07:08:05AM -0500, Ralph Palmer wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Stocker
><[1]dstoc...@thenotesetter.com> wrote:
>
> Ralph,
>
> If you haven't already tried it, have a look at this short, sweet
> walkthrough for setting up lilypo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:56 PM, David Stocker
wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> If you haven't already tried it, have a look at this short, sweet
> walkthrough for setting up lilypond-mode for emacs:
>
> http://www.geoffhorton.com/lilymacs.html
>
>
Actually, following the above instructions turned out to be th
Ralph,
If you haven't already tried it, have a look at this short, sweet
walkthrough for setting up lilypond-mode for emacs:
http://www.geoffhorton.com/lilymacs.html
I did this under Windows XP and (with some figuring and a little luck)
got it working on both my XP machines. I assume that un
Well, the basic (i.e., for people who understand emacs) instructions
are in the Application Usage, under Text Editor Support.
El 26.02.2009, a las 02:44, Ralph Palmer escribió:
Hi -
I'm an intermediate lilyponder and a novice penguinista. I have
Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid Ibex) mounted on an ol
Forgot to mention, the Emacs I installed from the repos was the GTK
flavor of Emacs 22. Not sure whether it makes a difference.
As far as Emacs vs. gEdit or something else, Emacs is a little more
'programmerish', with keystrokes that take some getting used to (c-x c-s
instead of ctr-s for save
Hi Ralph,
The lilypond-mode worked 'out of the box' for me when after opening a
.ly file with emacs or saving whatever file I was working on with a .ly
extension. At least this was true on Ubuntu 8.04 and Emacs 22 from the
Ubuntu repositories. Did you install Emacs from the repositories? If yo
Hi -
I'm an intermediate lilyponder and a novice penguinista. I have Ubuntu 8.10
(Intrepid Ibex) mounted on an older laptop. I successfully removed the
LilyPond version that came with the Ubuntu package, and installed 2.12
(although I thought the documentation would come with the installation
pack
kudos on the new release - it's awesome.
Mike
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello everyone,
Since most of the horizontal and vertical spacing hacks of Joe have
stabilized, I think it is time now to start considering a new stable
release. With the current release process, it should be possible to
build a new stable release in a matter of days, so the real question,
are
42 matches
Mail list logo
