On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:00 AM, James Bailey <derhindem...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> I don't know about linux, but on macintosh, there's absolutely zero > problem, the binaries are all self-contained. It's just a matter of calling > the right one. > > > On 20.12.2009, at 17:45, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> Is there an (easy) way to have both lilypond 2.12.x (stable) and lilypond >> 2.13.x (devel.) installed and useable on my system ? I'm always curious to >> try and test the latest features and bugfixes, but for distribution and >> sharing of lilypond sourcecode it is probably a better idea to use the >> stable release. >> >> I'm running linux fedora 12. >> >> -- >> >> I added a section about this to the Contributor's Guide a while back. Here's a link: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/concurrent-stable-and-development-versions#concurrent-stable-and-development-versions Jon -- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
