On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 09:28:28PM +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
[...]
> The original code by Shevek:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-04/msg00615.html
>
> Did you try to run convert-ly from HEAD over the file containing
> `add-durations`?
> For me it works and I get:
>
> #(d
Oh how funny, I didn't realize this was from one of my snippets. I should
post an updated version at some point. That snippet might have been the
first substantial Scheme code I ever wrote. There ought to be a simpler way
to do the same thing.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 3:29 PM Thomas Morley
wrote:
Am Di., 31. Dez. 2024 um 20:02 Uhr schrieb H. S. Teoh via LilyPond
user discussion :
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 01:55:28PM -0500, Saul Tobin wrote:
> >Did you run convert-ly from HEAD?
>
> I just tried it, the only difference in the output is the \version
> number.
>
>
> >On Tue, Dec 31, 2
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 01:55:28PM -0500, Saul Tobin wrote:
>Did you run convert-ly from HEAD?
I just tried it, the only difference in the output is the \version
number.
>On Tue, Dec 31, 2024, 1:53 PM H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion
><[1]lilypond-user@gnu.org> wrote:
[...]
>
Did you run convert-ly from HEAD?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024, 1:53 PM H. S. Teoh via LilyPond user discussion <
lilypond-user@gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing out the latest git HEAD version of lilypond with an
> orchestral score, and I'm getting this error:
>
&g
Hi,
I'm testing out the latest git HEAD version of lilypond with an
orchestral score, and I'm getting this error:
-
Parsing...ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
Unbound variable: ly:duration-length
ice-9/eval.scm:159:9: Throw to key `numerical-overflow' with
On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 22:33 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> CX writes:
>
> > Is it possible to build a specific stable lillypond version with sources
> > retrieved by git clone instead of a source tarball download?
> > If it is possible how can you do this (be
CX writes:
> Is it possible to build a specific stable lillypond version with sources
> retrieved by git clone instead of a source tarball download?
> If it is possible how can you do this (because I can not find the
> documentation to do it)?
The README in the repository refe
Is it possible to build a specific stable lillypond version with sources
retrieved by git clone instead of a source tarball download?
If it is possible how can you do this (because I can not find the
documentation to do it)?
Please help.
Best Regards Claude
Hello David
No that does not work, you need to compile from git. You might notice that
your generated pdf file does not in fact have transparency. This is because
the gs version bundled with the LP webpage download is 9.21, which is very old
(2016ish). For this transparency thing to work we
Hello David,
I'm simply using a colored markup with alpha channel. Such as
\markup\with-color #(rgb-color 1 0 0 0.5) "a"
Cheers,
Valentin
13.09.2021 06:59:02 David Wright :
> On Sat 11 Sep 2021 at 21:35:00 (+0200), Valentin Petzel wrote:
>> From what I see pdftops appears to be intelligent eno
On Sat 11 Sep 2021 at 19:11:36 (-0700), H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I discovered that converting the pdf to ps and back again significantly
> reduces the file size. So it's kinda my poor-man's way of compressing
> pdfs. Of course, this only works if your pdf doesn't contain any
> features incompatible w
On Sat 11 Sep 2021 at 21:35:00 (+0200), Valentin Petzel wrote:
> From what I see pdftops appears to be intelligent enough to rasterize the
> file
> only if it does actually contain transparency. If it does it uses a much less
> smooth rasterization that is probably not fit for printing, so be ca
"H. S. Teoh" writes:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 09:35:00PM +0200, Valentin Petzel wrote:
>> From what I see pdftops appears to be intelligent enough to rasterize
>> the file only if it does actually contain transparency. If it does it
>> uses a much less smooth rasterization that is probably not f
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 09:35:00PM +0200, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> From what I see pdftops appears to be intelligent enough to rasterize
> the file only if it does actually contain transparency. If it does it
> uses a much less smooth rasterization that is probably not fit for
> printing, so be car
From what I see pdftops appears to be intelligent enough to rasterize the file
only if it does actually contain transparency. If it does it uses a much less
smooth rasterization that is probably not fit for printing, so be careful with
this! See the attached picture for a comparisation, the left
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:04:11PM +0200, Valentin Petzel wrote:
> Okay. Basically the problem is that conversion from PDF to PS get’s
> really complicated at some point, and results in really large PS
> files.
>
> I’ve tracked down the responsible commit to be
> cf2ae39e9d93c2dcdc50afd7d0389c3148
ost noticeable when there's more than 1 page), and
> > > two .pdf's, one compiled by the official Debian lilypond package
> > > (2.22.1), and one by my local lilypond build (latest git master).
> > >
> > > The second file (test-bad.pdf) is noticeably
> Okay. Basically the problem is that conversion from PDF to PS get’s
> really complicated at some point, and results in really large PS
> files.
>
> I’ve tracked down the responsible commit to be
> cf2ae39e9d93c2dcdc50afd7d0389c314898273c, which implements
> transparency for PDF. Now this seems
Okay. Basically the problem is that conversion from PDF to PS get’s really
complicated at some point, and results in really large PS files.
I’ve tracked down the responsible commit to be
cf2ae39e9d93c2dcdc50afd7d0389c314898273c, which implements transparency for
PDF. Now this seems plausible, a
s, one compiled by the official Debian lilypond package
> > (2.22.1), and one by my local lilypond build (latest git master).
> >
> > The second file (test-bad.pdf) is noticeably slower to view on a PDF
> > viewer; this is especially noticeable when flipping between pages.
&g
ld (latest git master).
The second file (test-bad.pdf) is noticeably slower to view on a PDF
viewer; this is especially noticeable when flipping between pages.
Whereas the first one (test-good.pdf) renders quickly and pages quickly.
What is your PDF reader? With all of Evince,
Okular and Firefox&
Is it a problem with all documents, or only with specific ones? Can you give
us some example file where you get the problem (also maybe two pdf files
compiled with both versions)?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:22:50PM +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 10:46 +0200 schrieb Valentin Petzel:
[...]
> > This is nothing new and an arbitrary decision by Lilypond, simply
> > because XeTeX defaults to 1.5 and thus produces error when embedding
> > a 1.7 PDF.
>
Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 10:46 +0200 schrieb Valentin Petzel:
> Hello,
>
> This is nothing new and an arbitrary decision by Lilypond, simply because
> XeTeX defaults to 1.5 and thus produces error when embedding a 1.7 PDF.
>
> But this means that whatever problem you have should not come fr
Hello,
This is nothing new and an arbitrary decision by Lilypond, simply because
XeTeX defaults to 1.5 and thus produces error when embedding a 1.7 PDF.
But this means that whatever problem you have should not come frome the PDF
CompatibilityLevel, as this did never change (and anyway a lower v
Oh, is this why Adobe Reader has started putting up a box saying “preparing
output” when I open a LilyPond pdf?
Paul
Sent from my iPad
> On 10 Sep 2021, at 01:42, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> For a long time I have been using a local build of lilypond cloned from
>
Hi all,
For a long time I have been using a local build of lilypond cloned from
git, IIRC around 2.21.0 or thereabouts. Today, on a whim, I decided to
update lilypond to the latest git master. After recompiling everything,
lilypond started producing version 1.4 PDF files instead of version 1.7
in UNIX software development and IT Enterprise
> Architecture. I am critically aware of the impact that changes can
> have on people and existing code. However, I have been unhappy, as an
> end user, with OLL git being fragmented into a number of repos. This
> makes it harder than n
t; My career has been in UNIX software development and IT Enterprise
>
> Architecture. I am critically aware of the impact that changes can
>
> have on people and existing code. However, I have been unhappy, as an
>
> end user, with OLL git being fragmented into a number of repos. Thi
f the impact that changes can
> have on people and existing code. However, I have been unhappy, as an
> end user, with OLL git being fragmented into a number of repos. This
> makes it harder than need be for beginners and people, and part of the
> whole reason I am taking this on is to enhanc
Kudos to you, Andrew! And my thanks!
I have very limited experience in
1) Github;
2) Oll; and
3) programming,
but I'm willing to help in any way I can.
All the best,
Ralph
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 5:19 AM Andrew Bernard
wrote:
> To all interested in OLL. as I am starting this anew, in effect,
material and so on,
and anything else people may want.
My career has been in UNIX software development and IT Enterprise
Architecture. I am critically aware of the impact that changes can
have on people and existing code. However, I have been unhappy, as an
end user, with OLL git being fragmented
Am 07.10.20 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
> Urs and all,
>
> What happens to orphaned git repos? Not a case I am familiar with.
>
> I'd be happy to fork the OLL repo and take over the management and
> development. Should I do that? Are you going to delete the existing
Urs and all,
What happens to orphaned git repos? Not a case I am familiar with.
I'd be happy to fork the OLL repo and take over the management and
development. Should I do that? Are you going to delete the existing
repo?
Andrew
On 4/18/20, Noeck wrote:
> It could not adapt this to my situation:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11961400/getting-rid-of-git-usr-local-lib-libz-so-1-no-version-information-available
> Any idea about this?
Well, the easiest solution I found was to compile LilyPond myself.
Not
Hi
Am 17.04.20 um 00:40 schrieb Noeck:
> Parsing...git: /…path/to…/lilypond-2.20.0-1/lilypond/usr/lib/libz.so.1:
> no version information available (required by git)
It seems to be a library issue. The shared library exists. It is a
symlink to libz.so.1.2.3
It could not adapt this
Hi,
I am using the function below which is adapted from
http://lilypondblog.org/2014/01/why-use-version-control-for-engraving-scores/#more-2151
While it works and the .ly files compile successfully, the function
issues a warning (?) I’d like to get rid of.
1) If the document is in a git
rup
>:
>> > >
>> > > Thomas Morley writes:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from
>> > > > 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb
>
Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:40 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
> :
> >
> > Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
> > >
> > > Thomas Morley writes:
> > >
> > > >
Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
> >
> > Thomas Morley writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e.
Am So., 16. Feb. 2020 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb David Kastrup :
>
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from
> > 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb
> >
> > Even an input of nothing m
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from
> 3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb
>
> Even an input of nothing more than
> { s1 }
> results in a gs-error:
>
> Starting lilydevel 2.19.84 [Untitled]...
> Proc
Hi,
I used frescobaldi from git, with most recent master, i.e. from
3f29c3e90a4b460d9fb6aa066234e0d4e54013bb
Even an input of nothing more than
{ s1 }
results in a gs-error:
Starting lilydevel 2.19.84 [Untitled]...
Processing `/tmp/frescobaldi-ua0f6js5/tmp2h4kg_nt/document.ly'
Parsing...
Am 04.05.19 um 16:08 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Am Sa., 4. Mai 2019 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
You *did* read this guide=
https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux ?
No.
On
https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi
I couldn't find anything helpful.
Wha
Am Sa., 4. Mai 2019 um 15:40 Uhr schrieb Urs Liska :
> You *did* read this guide=
> https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-on-Linux ?
No.
On
https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi
I couldn't find anything helpful.
Now that you provided the link, I _searched_ the s
Am Sa., 4. Mai 2019 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to get frescobaldi from git work.
> No success.
>
> I've read and reread all the READMEs and INSTALLs, now I'm heavily confused.
> Could someone write (or point me to) a installa
Am 04.05.19 um 14:50 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
I just tried to get frescobaldi from git work.
No success.
I've read and reread all the READMEs and INSTALLs, now I'm heavily confused.
Could someone write (or point me to) a installation-guide for dummies?
Probably starting
Hi,
I just tried to get frescobaldi from git work.
No success.
I've read and reread all the READMEs and INSTALLs, now I'm heavily confused.
Could someone write (or point me to) a installation-guide for dummies?
Probably starting here
https://github.com/frescobaldi
I'm on Ubun
Am 13.08.2018 um 21:47 schrieb eBooks:
On Aug 13, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
I have written a Wiki page on how Frescobaldi can be run from its Git
repository on Windows:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-from-Git-on-Windows
and I would like Windows
Am 14.08.2018 um 09:26 schrieb Partitura Organum:
On 13-8-2018 19:05, Urs Liska wrote:
I have written a Wiki page on how Frescobaldi can be run from its Git
repository on Windows:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-from-Git-on-Windows
and I would like Windows
On 13-8-2018 19:05, Urs Liska wrote:
I have written a Wiki page on how Frescobaldi can be run from its Git
repository on Windows:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-from-Git-on-Windows
and I would like Windows users to test that and report any issues. I
did it on
On Aug 13, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> I have written a Wiki page on how Frescobaldi can be run from its Git
> repository on Windows:
> https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-from-Git-on-Windows
> and I would like Windows users to test that
I have written a Wiki page on how Frescobaldi can be run from its Git
repository on Windows:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-3-from-Git-on-Windows
and I would like Windows users to test that and report any issues. I did
it on Windows 7 and using all the default
t afterwards.
>
Indeed, leads to:
\version "2.19.65"
#(use-modules (ice-9 popen))
#(use-modules (ice-9 rdelim))
#(define (strsystem_internal cmd)
(let* ((port (open-input-pipe cmd))
(str (read-delimited "" port)))
(close-pipe port)
(if (eof-object?
Thanks URS,
Another great idea for me to try!
Cheers,
Ben
On Jan 16, 2018 08:37, "Urs Liska" wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.01.2018 um 14:27 schrieb Ben Beeson:
>
> Hi,
>
> Wow, that looks very promising. I am looking at this note on my cell
> phone right now, so I cannot test it just yet. I will try th
Am 16.01.2018 um 14:27 schrieb Ben Beeson:
Hi,
Wow, that looks very promising. I am looking at this note on my cell
phone right now, so I cannot test it just yet. I will try this later
when I get home and see what happens.
But you should also look into the openLilyLib files, create a copy
Hi,
Wow, that looks very promising. I am looking at this note on my cell phone
right now, so I cannot test it just yet. I will try this later when I get
home and see what happens.
Thanks very much for this!
Cheers,
Ben
On Jan 15, 2018 21:38, "Flaming Hakama by Elaine"
wrote:
On Sun, Ja
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Actually I misread your original post and referred you to what you already
> had.
>
> Elaine's hint is true but won't bring you any further because that's what
> is already happening in the background when you use the \gitCommittish
mitish I am using is the same as the one linked at:
>https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/editorial-tools/git
>-commands/
>So after committing the LilyPond files to the repository, the current
>git version will appear in the tagline when you rebuild the pdf since
>that
Good evening all,
I have attached an example that I hope helps.
Thomas, the gitCommitish I am using is the same as the one linked at:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/blob/master/editorial-tools/git
-commands/
So after committing the LilyPond files to the repository, the current
git
Hi,
when I've seen the inclusion of git information on lilypondblog [1], I
liked it and adapted it to my taste:
Of course one can include a whole git log in the score, but the only
thing I was interested in is this: If I have a printed score or a PDF, I
want to know which version that was
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
From: Ben Beeson
> To: David Kastrup , lilypond-user
> Subject: Re: How to append a git version to an output filename
> Hi David,
>
> ...
>
> What I seek is a way to append whatever the current git version is to the
&g
Ben Beeson writes:
> Hi David,
>
> It has been a while since I visited the site, but more information on
> using git with scores is available at:
> http://lilypondblog.org/2014/04/printing-git-versioning-info-in-a-score
> /
> Urs Liska and Lars Haulin provide some excellent
Hi David,
It has been a while since I visited the site, but more information on
using git with scores is available at:
http://lilypondblog.org/2014/04/printing-git-versioning-info-in-a-score
/
Urs Liska and Lars Haulin provide some excellent tools and commentary
with a link to the current
composer = ""
>> arranger = ""
>> meter = ""
>> tagline = \markup { \filename " " \source " " git Version:
>> \gitCommitish Committed: \gitDateTime
>> Engraved:
>>
he header declaration, add the \gitCommitish and any other
> items desired to the tagline entry:
>
> \header {
> title = "Title"
> composer = ""
> arranger = ""
> meter = ""
>
to the tagline entry:
\header {
title = "Title"
composer = ""
arranger = ""
meter = ""
tagline = \markup { \filename " " \source " " git Version:
\gitCommitish Committed: \g
Am 14.01.2018 um 11:44 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Hi Ben,
I think the desire to add git version information to files is a
hangover from earlier days when people used to do this with SCCS, CVS,
RCS, and all those antique systems. With git, due to its model, that's
not so commonly done now
Hi Ben,
I think the desire to add git version information to files is a hangover
from earlier days when people used to do this with SCCS, CVS, RCS, and all
those antique systems. With git, due to its model, that's not so commonly
done nowadays.
If you want to manage your files by the comple
Hi Ben,
Am 14.01.2018 um 03:17 schrieb Ben Beeson:
Hello all,
I am using git to keep track of edits to scores and am presently using
\bookOutputName "score-filename"
to write the output filename for the pdf that is generated in the
LilyPond "ly" file. I am also
Ben Beeson writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I am using git to keep track of edits to scores and am presently using
>
>
> \bookOutputName "score-filename"
>
> to write the output filename for the pdf that is generated in the
> LilyPond "ly"
Hello all,
I am using git to keep track of edits to scores and am presently using
\bookOutputName "score-filename"
to write the output filename for the pdf that is generated in the
LilyPond "ly" file. I am also using
"git Version: \gitCommitish
nd I think
most of the remaining open issues on the tracker
(https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/labels/gsoc-2017-git) should not
block that branch from being merged.
So please, anyone who is using Frescobaldi from the Git repository or
can do so is invited to check out the rewrite-vcs branc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:31:20PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>Nice. I have a simpler solution for those who launch a bash script for
>rendering en masse. The script has this line:
>
>echo "hash="\"Git version `git
tracker item on Github will not be noticed by many I wrote
this post to ask anyone who is interested in the Frescobaldi Git
integration to have a look and engage in discussion.
Please do not reply to *this* post as I will not monitor it, and I also
think Wen Xin might not take no
d score, so best
> put it in a separate file and \include it.
>
Nice. I have a simpler solution for those who launch a bash script for
rendering en masse. The script has this line:
echo "hash="\"Git version `git log --pretty="%h %s" | head -1`"\""
On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 13:40 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:40:10PM +, Vlad Kudelin wrote:
> > Lilypond just makes it natural to put everything under
> >version control!
> [...]
>
> [...] I use git, which allows me to experiment w
Am 25.05.2017 um 14:04 schrieb Leszek Wroński:
>
> Guys,
>
> apologies if I've missed something obvious, but what is the intended
> place for discussing the very welcome 'Add Git support to Frescobaldi'
> project? Here? The Frescobaldi forum? The wiki (but where?
Guys,
apologies if I've missed something obvious, but what is the intended place
for discussing the very welcome 'Add Git support to Frescobaldi' project?
Here? The Frescobaldi forum? The wiki (but where?)?
(I just have a minor requst: it would be convenient if we could cr
Il giorno lun 22 mag 2017 alle 17:36, Urs Liska ha
scritto:
This design is mainly discussed by me and Urs. We want to hear more
voices from the community to help make this design become better and
more practical. Please comment below if you have related ideas, thank
you!
The wiki page is gre
Hi LilyPond users,
below is a message by Wen Xin, a student who will work on adding Git
support to Frescobaldi over the summer as his GSoC project.
Please have a look at the introduction and also the Wiki page that is
linked, we would like to have more discussion before going into actual
g wrong in the code, but it doesn't work for me. So
I'd be happy if others could give it a try to see if we've missed
something in the code or if it's an issue with my set-up.
Steps to do so:
Be sure that you run Frescobaldi from its Git repository
Add https:/
d be happy if others
could give it a try to see if we've missed something in the code or if
it's an issue with my set-up.
Steps to do so:
* Be sure that you run Frescobaldi from its Git repository
* Add https://github.com/prabhanshuguptagit/frescobaldi.git as a remote
* Pull fro
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:25:10PM +0300, Heikki Tauriainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:16 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > I've been using lilypond from git HEAD (mainly because lilypond in
> > my distro is too old, still stuck at 2.18, and I need features a
Hi,
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:16 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I've been using lilypond from git HEAD (mainly because lilypond in my
> distro is too old, still stuck at 2.18, and I need features and fixes
> in 2.19), and recently I noticed that midi dynamics in my piano
> scores aren
I've been using lilypond from git HEAD (mainly because lilypond in my
distro is too old, still stuck at 2.18, and I need features and fixes in
2.19), and recently I noticed that midi dynamics in my piano scores
aren't being rendered correctly anymore. Looking into the commit log,
Il giorno gio 10 dic 2015 alle 12:15, Ed.Klarinet
ha scritto:
Hi Federico,
Because the environment variable is set in .bashrc (the advantage is
that it will work either if frescobaldi is run from terminal and if
it's run from the desktop).
You missed that part of the wiki or didn't work for
Hi Federico,
Because the environment variable is set in .bashrc (the advantage is
that it will work either if frescobaldi is run from terminal and if
it's run from the desktop).
You missed that part of the wiki or didn't work for you?
It didn't. Is does when I run Frescobaldi from the termina
Il giorno gio 10 dic 2015 alle 11:56, Ed.Klarinet
ha scritto:
Hi,
Maybe this is useful for those who want to run Frescobaldi from Git.
I just succeeded running Frescobaldi using a Git clone as described
in this wiki:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-from-git
But I
Hi,
Maybe this is useful for those who want to run Frescobaldi from Git.
I just succeeded running Frescobaldi using a Git clone as described in
this wiki:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/wiki/Run-Frescobaldi-from-git
But I had to change my desktop file to run Frescobaldi from the menu
Hi list,
I've struggled with that too long so I have to ask for help. And I think
some personal assistance would be much more helpful than trying to
formulate a question for stackoverflow or the like ...
I'm trying to get the Git hook to run on my Debian server that pro
perfectly; because in the single
repos at the top level I only have publication pdf:s and I have them
ignored by git anyway. So when I merge the repos in as is they only
create the suitable subfolder.
Best
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Thanks for all suggestions. It's really appreciated!
I have a question for those who use version control (and especially
Git) with LilyPond:
When I write a new piece (or rather when a first version is written)
I'd like to edit this as a single repo. But when it's (more) finis
2015-06-06 5:52 GMT-07:00 Johan Vromans :
> On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:12:01 +0200
> Peter Bjuhr wrote:
>
> > How can I do this?
>
> See e.g.
>
> http://blog.karssen.org/2013/06/06/importing-a-git-repo-into-another-one-keeping-all-history/
> and several other discuss
l. Otherwise you may run into quite conflicting situations.
HTH
Urs
Am 06.06.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Peter Bjuhr:
Hi all,
I have a question for those who use version control (and especially
Git) with LilyPond:
When I write a new piece (or rather when a first version is written)
I'd like
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:12:01 +0200
Peter Bjuhr wrote:
> How can I do this?
See e.g.
http://blog.karssen.org/2013/06/06/importing-a-git-repo-into-another-one-keeping-all-history/
and several other discussions on the internets.
-- Johan
___
lilyp
Il giorno sab 6 giu 2015 alle 10:12, Peter Bjuhr
ha scritto:
I have a question for those who use version control (and especially
Git) with LilyPond:
When I write a new piece (or rather when a first version is written)
I'd like to edit this as a single repo. But when it's (more) f
Hi all,
I have a question for those who use version control (and especially Git)
with LilyPond:
When I write a new piece (or rather when a first version is written) I'd
like to edit this as a single repo. But when it's (more) finished I
think it would be better to collect it
On 2015-02-27 11:31 PM, Craig Dabelstein wrote:
Hi Lilyponders,
Does anyone have experience with trying to write lilypond files on
their iPad and uploading them to Git?
I'm using the Textastic app on the iPad (because it recognises
Lilypond syntax), combined with Textexpander for a
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
