arsonm...@ca.rr.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cross voice
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 4:00 PM mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com> > wrote:
Knute,
Yes!
Thank you.
You're welcome. It looks like you have it sorted, but this is what I threw
together:
%%%
\version &quo
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 4:00 PM wrote:
> Knute,
>
>
>
> Yes!
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
You're welcome. It looks like you have it sorted, but this is what I threw
together:
%%%
\version "2.24.4"
\language "english"
staffUp = \change Staff = "upper"
staffDown = \change Staff = "lower"
rightHandUp
Knute,
Yes!
Thank you.
Mark
From: Knute Snortum
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2025 3:52 PM
To: carsonm...@ca.rr.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: cross voice
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 2:54 PM mailto:carsonm...@ca.rr.com> > wrote:
Hello all,
Using explicit voice
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 2:54 PM wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Using explicit voices I am engraving a four-voice fugue, BWV 911.
>
> The e-flat quaver in the alto starts the theme (inverted) that continues
> in the next measure in the tenor.
>
> How can I keep the beaming intact throughout the theme
Hello all,
Using explicit voices I am engraving a four-voice fugue, BWV 911.
The e-flat quaver in the alto starts the theme (inverted) that continues in
the next measure in the tenor.
How can I keep the beaming intact throughout the theme?
Thank you for your kind attention.
Mark
Hi all,
Am Samstag, den 25. Februar 2017 um 17:41:15 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Urs Liska:
> Yes, but I think the issue is solved by now with Andrew's suggestion.
it is indeed. Thanks Andrew!
Yours,
Orm
--
Prof. Orm Finnendahl
Komposition
Am 25.02.2017 um 17:21 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> - Original Message - From: "Orm Finnendahl"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: cross-voice ties and merging noteheads
>
>
>> Am Samstag, den 25. Februar 2017 um 14:2
- Original Message -
From: "Orm Finnendahl"
To:
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: cross-voice ties and merging noteheads
Am Samstag, den 25. Februar 2017 um 14:25:52 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Urs
Liska:
An image would be helpful to avoid misunderstandings.
Am Samstag, den 25. Februar 2017 um 14:25:52 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Urs Liska:
> An image would be helpful to avoid misunderstandings.
attached. I tried to keep the file size small. Let me know if you
need it in better resolution.
--
Orm
___
lilypond-user
Hi Orm,
Use voices. Here's a rough outline answer sketched out quickly, without
seeing the publication you refer to.
Basically you can only tie across notes in the same voice, so that clues
you in as to the way to set such music.
Andrew
== snip
\score {
\new Staff \with { tieWaitForNote = #
Am 25. Februar 2017 13:33:54 MEZ schrieb Orm Finnendahl
:
>Hi,
>
> in the example below (an excerpt of the left hand piano part of the
>Schumann Song "Mondnacht") I'd like to resemble the rendering of
>Clara Schumann's Edition in the Breitkopf&Härtel print.
An image would be helpful to avoid mi
Hi,
in the example below (an excerpt of the left hand piano part of the
Schumann Song "Mondnacht") I'd like to resemble the rendering of
Clara Schumann's Edition in the Breitkopf&Härtel print.
%<
\version "2.19.48"
\score {
\new Staff \with { tieWaitFor
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Where are we at with the cross voice tie work that was being done at the
> GSoC? Is this anywhere near ready or complete?
It was cross voice dynamics. I am still crawling along reviewing the
C++ code as it is planned to be versatile enough to eventually be usef
Where are we at with the cross voice tie work that was being done at the
GSoC? Is this anywhere near ready or complete?
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2015-01-18 23:11 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> I'm ashamed I couldn't figure how to use a function with an optional
>> argument for it.
>>
>> Best I found is:
>>
>> #(define* (parenthesized-arpeggio #:optional (ctx "Bottom"))
>> #{
>> \override #ctx . Arpeggio.stenci
Thomas Morley writes:
> I'm ashamed I couldn't figure how to use a function with an optional
> argument for it.
>
> Best I found is:
>
> #(define* (parenthesized-arpeggio #:optional (ctx "Bottom"))
> #{
> \override #ctx . Arpeggio.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-slur
> \override #ctx
2015-01-18 19:35 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
> Am 18.01.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>
>> 2015-01-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 Samuel DA MOTA :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On the following documentation, it explains how to create arpeggios
>>> across notes in different voices.
>>>
>>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19
Am 18.01.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2015-01-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 Samuel DA MOTA :
Hi,
On the following documentation, it explains how to create arpeggios
across notes in different voices.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio
I tried to
Exactly,
That's perfect. Thanks!
Might be worth to add this example to the documentation, or at the
very least to the LSR.
What do you think?
Regards,
--
Sam
On 18/01/2015, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-01-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 Samuel DA MOTA :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On the following documentation, it explai
2015-01-18 18:31 GMT+01:00 Samuel DA MOTA :
> Hi,
>
> On the following documentation, it explains how to create arpeggios
> across notes in different voices.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio
>
> I tried to tweak the example to get parenthesis
Hi,
On the following documentation, it explains how to create arpeggios
across notes in different voices.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-lines#arpeggio
I tried to tweak the example to get parenthesis arpeggios across
voices, with no success.
Can anyone h
lution (I wouldn't know how to find this in
the docs)!
> It looks like LilyPond does not notice that the arpeggio needs to move
> left for the lower-staff accidental, when choosing note-spacing.
worth a bug repot?
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble
Michael Rivers gmail.com> writes:
> In this excerpt from a piece I'm typesetting, the first two arpeggios are
> fine, but the third collides with the previous note in the right hand's
> upper voice. Is there a way to avoid the collision?
>
When you need more space between notes, you can use ext
list you'll find a nice
solution!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Cross-staff-cross-voice-arpeggio-colliding-with-previous-note-tp146197p146203.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
score {
\new PianoStaff
<<
\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
\new Staff = "right" \with {\consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"} <<
\rightOne \\ \rightTwo >>
\new Staff = "left" { \clef bass \left }
>>
}
--
View this message in context:
http:
27;ve added
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3289&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
to the tracker!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Cross-voice-arpeggio-moves-accidental-away-from-notehead-tp143711p1437
See example below. The chord across two voices has the accidental next
to the notehead. Add an arpeggio and the accidental and arpeggio both
get spaced away to the left. How do I move the accidental back next to
the notehead?
\version "2.17.15"
\new Staff <<
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##
On Thursday 10 March 2005 22.11, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 10 March 2005 20.58, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> I gave bar 235 a try:
>
I thought some more about it. This gives no warnings, but more importantly, it
_feels_ better :) (it's cleaner somehow):
\relative {
<<{d16( a') s a s a[ s
haconne.gif
>
> or, if you prefer PDF:
>
> http://dead-parrot.de/chaconne.pdf
>
> The alternating beams aren't the problem, I just use the tip in
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html
>
> However, I don't know how to get the (tec
beams aren't the problem, I just use the tip in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/input/test/out-www/collated-files.html
However, I don't know how to get the (technically) cross-voice slurs
managed.
Any idea is welcome.
Ciao,
Kili
___
lilypo
{ 2\arpeggio fis4 }>>
}
}
/Mats
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I want to make cross-voice arpeggios for 2.2.5
I've found this but, \hideNotes in not allowed chords:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-10/msg00032.html
So I invented a solution:
<< \context Voice = "
tes\relative c'{\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
<< { cis4.\arpeggio b8 a4} \\ { 2\arpeggio fis4 }>>
}
}
/Mats
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I want to make cross-voice arpeggios for 2.2.5
I've found this but, \hideNotes in not allowed chords:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/htm
I want to make cross-voice arpeggios for 2.2.5
I've found this but, \hideNotes in not allowed chords:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-10/msg00032.html
So I invented a solution:
<< \context Voice = "arp" { \hideNotes 4.\arpeggio }
{ cis4. h8 a4} \\ { 2 fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm intrigued by input/test/music-box.ly -- it uses Scheme functions
> to save typing work. Could I use some Scheme function to create an
> alternating pattern (either of stemUp/stemDown or of
> VisibleNote/InvisibleNote) ? So I write my score like this:
>
> <{[d16 s
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 10:31:49 +0200
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not make an invisible note to attach the slur to?
> See input/test/bland-notes.ly.
That'd work, although it still leaves a lot of typing...
I'm intrigued by input/test/music-box.ly -- it uses Scheme functions
to s
Why not make an invisible note to attach the slur to?
See input/test/bland-notes.ly.
/Mats
> Is there any way to make a slur between voices? Or can you make a slur
> attach to an invisible rest (or space?)
>
> I'd like to attach each consecutive pair of 16th notes together with a
> slur, but
Is there any way to make a slur between voices? Or can you make a slur
attach to an invisible rest (or space?)
I'd like to attach each consecutive pair of 16th notes together with a
slur, but I the 16ths need to have alternative stems as well (up down
up down). I _could_ do that it one voice (i
37 matches
Mail list logo
