Re: Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

midi. Thanks, -William % - \version "2.25.19" rightHand = \relative { \time 3/4 << { \voiceOne e'4. d'8 } \new Voice { \voiceFour e,2 } >> \oneVoice \appoggiatura { c'16 d e } d8 c | c8 } \include "articulate.ly" \score {

Re: Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

On 2024-09-16 14:27, Knute Snortum wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:14 PM Knute Snortum wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote: In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. Ho

Re: Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 2:14 PM Knute Snortum wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written >> duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. How is that supposed >> to work? You probably want \acc

Re: Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written > duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. How is that supposed > to work? You probably want \acciaccatura or \grace instead. I think you're right that I need

Re: Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

ng but > % it shows how the measure is correct. > % \score { > % \new Staff \rightHand > % \layout {} > % } > > \include "articulate.ly" > > \score { > \articulate << > \new Staff \rightHand > >> > \midi {} > } > %%% &g

Bad bar check warning with two voices, appoggiatura, and articulate

% } \include "articulate.ly" \score { \articulate << \new Staff \rightHand >> \midi {} } %%% This may be related to the problems with creating the MIDI output of an appoggiatura with articulate. -- Knute Snortum

Re: Articulate has trouble with grace note at time signature change

>> Please check the looong list of bugs related to `\articulate` >> whether it has already been reported. > > Seems to be #3696, reported - by you - in 2013. D'oh :-) Werner

Re: Articulate has trouble with grace note at time signature change

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:09 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > This fails in 2.24.1 with messages about mid-measure time signature > > change and failed barcheck: > > > > \include "articulate.ly" > > \articulate > > { > > \ti

Re: Articulate has trouble with grace note at time signature change

On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Please check the looong list of bugs related to `\articulate` whether > it has already been reported. Seems to be #3696, reported - by you - in 2013. -- Matthew Skala msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before tribes.

Re: Articulate has trouble with grace note at time signature change

> This fails in 2.24.1 with messages about mid-measure time signature > change and failed barcheck: > > \include "articulate.ly" > \articulate > { > \time 4/4 > c'1 | > \time 3/2 > \grace d'8 c'1. | > } > > Succeeds if

Articulate has trouble with grace note at time signature change

This fails in 2.24.1 with messages about mid-measure time signature change and failed barcheck: \include "articulate.ly" \articulate { \time 4/4 c'1 | \time 3/2 \grace d'8 c'1. | } Succeeds if \articulate is not used. I can work around it by tagging MIDI and

Re: Lilypond 2.22.2 (Mac homebrew) warns about ice-9 when using \articulate

Very cool. On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 5:42 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 26/03/2022 à 01:41, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit : > > HI; > > > > Is this something to be concerned about? > > > No, it is strictly harmless. The warning has been fixed in the 2.23 series. > > Jean

Re: Lilypond 2.22.2 (Mac homebrew) warns about ice-9 when using \articulate

Le 26/03/2022 à 01:41, Kenneth Wolcott a écrit : HI; Is this something to be concerned about? No, it is strictly harmless. The warning has been fixed in the 2.23 series. Jean

Lilypond 2.22.2 (Mac homebrew) warns about ice-9 when using \articulate

HI; Is this something to be concerned about? Thanks, Ken Wolcott Lilypond 2.22.2 (Mac homebrew) warns about ice-9 when using \articulate GNU LilyPond 2.22.2 (running Guile 2.2) Processing `Silent_Night.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32][40][48] Preprocessing graphical ob

Re: articulate

(1) source / pdf / mid without using articulate > > (2) source / pdf / mid with using articulate > > Note the pdf / mid output in (2): gratuitous / extraneous rests, and no > evidence (that we see or hear!?) of rit. being applied. > > Have we set this up right? wrong? wha

articulate

Hello, LilyPond friends, We are new to this game... hope we're doing things righthere? ...but in any case, we have a problem. Attached please find these minimal – ! – files:     (1) source / pdf/ mid without using articulate     (2) source / pdf/ mid with using articulate Note the pdf

Re: Another way \articulate messes up bar line checks

#x27;s Knute> my MWE: That's a problem with the music. To avoid the barcheck fail the last bar should have only three crotchets in it, to match the anacrusis. If you replace \articulate with \unfoldRepeats you'll see the issue. Like so: %%%START \version "2.20.0"

Another way \articulate messes up bar line checks

volta 2 { \partial 4 f4 c4 d e f | c4 d e } \repeat volta 2 { f4 | c4 d e f | } } \include "articulate.ly" \score { \articulate { % Remove articulate and all is well! \new Staff \rightHand } } %%%End --- Knute Snortum (via Gmail)

MIDI, articulate script, slurs, and grace notes

Hi everybody, Quick question: is there a fix for the articulate script to perform slurs correctly until the end if there happens to be a grace note in the middle of it? What I mean by that is, once the slur is interrupted by the grace note, the MIDI file doesn't pick it up from where it lef

articulate with grace notes and contexts fails barline check

I think this is a bug, but I wanted to run it past the users' group first. The heart of the problem is that the function articulate is not producing the correct MIDI output with grace notes in certain situations. The symptom is that a bar check fails. Below is a MWE. I know it doesn&#

Work-around for articulate+acciaccatura bug?

Hi all, I’ve just been bit by a bug I’ve seen reference to, where \version "2.19.52" \include "articulate.ly" \score { \articulate { << c'1 \\ e'1 >> \acciaccatura c'8

trill starting note midi articulate

If I write \version "2.19.49" \include "articulate.ly" \score { \displayLilyMusic \articulate {c'4\trill} \layout {} \midi{} } the trill generated starts with d. Is there any way to make "articulate" genera

Prall and trill in "articulate" script

Hello. It's the first time I use the "\articulate" command. Very nice improvement on the plain MIDI rendering! Two remarks: 1. "prall" is interpreted in a way that (IMO) better corresponds to "prallprall" (which itself is not implemented). [A com

Re: \articulate effect only midi

Ciao Federico, thank you for you help, now it works!! I didn't know "score" keyword can compare multiple times in a single source file. Best regards, g. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/articulate-effect-only-midi-tp177365p177367.html Sen

Re: \articulate effect only midi

Il giorno lun 1 giu 2015 alle 11:52, Gianmaria Lari ha scritto: I'm trying to improve the quality of the midi output using the articulate script. I don't understand why I cannot use the articulate keyword only with the midi output to avoid to alterate the visual output. You shou

\articulate effect only midi

I'm trying to improve the quality of the midi output using the articulate script. I don't understand why I cannot use the articulate keyword only with the midi output to avoid to alterate the visual output. This is what I can do: \version "2.18.2" \include &qu

Re: \articulate command and "rit." was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 147, Issue 102

>>>>> "Cynthia" == Cynthia Karl writes: Cynthia> Maybe you can answer a question about \articulate: if I Cynthia> generate a pdf file for the score containing the \midi block, Cynthia> why doesn't the pdf file reflect what is in the midi file? Cynthia>

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

v2.19/Documentation/changes/index.html>. But > indeed, it seems to be a bug if \articulate can’t handle them. > > Yours, Simon > > Am 15.02.2015 15:26, schrieb Cynthia Karl: > > For example, > > \version "2.19.15" > \include "articulate.ly" > > \sc

Re: \articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

Hello, the support for standalone durations was one of the first (and most important?) changes made in 2.19 (see <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index.html>. But indeed, it seems to be a bug if \articulate can't handle them. Yours, Simon Am 15.02.2015 15:

\articulate command doesn't handle {c4 4}

use of naked duration occurs on NM p371: which produces: If examples such as this are modified by the \articulate command, the midi file is non-representative of the LP input. For example, \version "2.19.15" \include "articulate.ly" \score { { \un

Re: \articulate command and "rit." was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 147, Issue 102

es, so you can listen to what was entered. This is convenient for checking the music; octaves that are off or accidentals that were mistyped [...] " And that's the best one can say about midi. Any simple midi from computer generated music sounds terrible. It has _nothing_ to do with mu

\articulate command and "rit." was: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 147, Issue 102

8 GMT+01:00 Patrick Karl : >> I have run into a couple of anomalies with the \articulate command and the >> abbreviation "rit." >> >> First, >> >> \version "2.19.15" >> \include "articulate.ly" >> >> \score{ >&g

Seeking piano template: Dynamics, pedals, articulate, and MIDI

>> \layout{ } } \score { \context PianoStaff << \set PianoStaff.midiInstrument = "acoustic grand" \new Staff { \clef treble \unfoldRepeats \articulate \rhmusic } \new Dynamics = "dynamics" \dy

Re: \articulate problem

> "Patrick" == Patrick or Cynthia Karl writes: Interesting. The problem is in the Prall rendition: It comes out as: { < d'' >32 < c'' > < d'' > < c'' >1*-1/32 } This is generated from a ly:music-compress function applied to { 32} to squash it to the same length as the original s

\articulate problem

me = "A" \clef treble c4 c c c c4 c c c } \score { \unfoldRepeats \articulate \new ChoirStaff << \new Staff { \S } \new Staff { \A } >> \layout { } \midi { } } The chief problem is that it generates a defective midi file in that there is a eighth note sh

Re: Problem with articulate and alternative

Il 24/02/2013 23:03, Nick Payne ha scritto: If I remove the call to \articulate then there is no error, or if I leave the call to \articulate and remove the alternative block then there is no error. Thanks for adding this analysis. Added here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id

Problem with articulate and alternative

d/usr/share/lilypond/current/ly/articulate.ly:446:13: Wrong number of arguments to # If I remove the call to \articulate then there is no error, or if I leave the call to \articulate and remove the alternative block then there is no error. %=== \version "2.17.13&

Re: articulate not working ?

In that case, when things go wrong with music functions not yet > rewritten, you can just manually call the wrapper on the music and the > music function will get to see the old structure. > > It would appear that articulate is a candidate for that. I have taken the liberty of "fixin

Re: articulate not working ?

n just manually call the wrapper on the music and the music function will get to see the old structure. It would appear that articulate is a candidate for that. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: articulate not working ?

On 02/14/2012 06:46 AM, m.tarensk...@zonnet.nl wrote: > Is he reading this mailinglist(s) ? Can't find his e-mail address. I doubt it, but I have CC’d him on this message. I sent an e-mail a couple of months ago with some proposed changes to mordent and prall, and never got a response. ~Chris --

Re: articulate not working ?

Citeren David Kastrup : Martin Tarenskeen writes: it seems to me nothing is wrong with this example: \include "articulate.ly" \score { \unfoldRepeats \articulate << \context Staff { \set Staff.midiInstrument="clarinet" \relative c' {

articulate not working ?

Hi, it seems to me nothing is wrong with this example: \include "articulate.ly" \score { \unfoldRepeats \articulate << \context Staff { \set Staff.midiInstrument="clarinet" \relative c' { \time 4/4 \tempo 4=100 c4-. c4( d

Re: articulate problem (Marc Hohl)

Am 20.08.2011 23:38, schrieb Patrick Karl: [...] (here, we don't want to get printable scores). HTH, Why don't we want to get printable scores here? \articulate is made for improving lilypond's MIDI output, nothing more, nothing less. In the header of ly/articulate.ly,

Re: articulate problem

Am 19.08.2011 21:36, schrieb Marc Hohl: Am 19.08.2011 19:13, schrieb Patrick Karl: I am having a problem with the \articulate command in LilyPond 2.14.1 on a mac with OSX 10.6.8. For example, with the lilypond input file (I call it "articulate_problem.ly): \version "2.14.1

Re: articulate problem

Am 19.08.2011 19:13, schrieb Patrick Karl: I am having a problem with the \articulate command in LilyPond 2.14.1 on a mac with OSX 10.6.8. For example, with the lilypond input file (I call it "articulate_problem.ly): \version "2.14.1" \include "articulate.ly&qu

articulate problem

I am having a problem with the \articulate command in LilyPond 2.14.1 on a mac with OSX 10.6.8. For example, with the lilypond input file (I call it "articulate_problem.ly): \version "2.14.1" \include "articulate.ly" music = \relative b' {

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

2011/7/8 Martin Tarenskeen : > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Janek Warchoł wrote: >> I'm not a good schemer, so i cannot fix it, but i've added it to the >> tracker: >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1745 >> > > id=1745 does not seem to be related to Subject ? oops, i pasted wrong link

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

ve taken a look at  this now ... there's no easy way to fix the > problem.  To articulate something like > >    4 > > you need to split the c into a note and a rest.  At present it rewites > it, essentially, to > >    8.. r16 4 > > To make this work, it'd have

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

I've taken a look at this now ... there's no easy way to fix the problem. To articulate something like 4 you need to split the c into a note and a rest. At present it rewites it, essentially, to 8.. r16 4 To make this work, it'd have to rewrite to: <<{a

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Tarenskeen writes: Martin> I am using lilypond 2.13.62 now. The following example seems Martin> to show that \articulate has a problem with tied chords, Or am Martin> I doing something wrong ? No, you're not doing anything

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

On Mon, 30 May 2011, Colin Campbell wrote: On 11-05-30 03:12 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, I am using lilypond 2.13.62 now. The following example seems to show that \articulate has a problem with tied chords, Or am I doing something wrong ? 2 | If you tie the chord instead of

Re: problem with articulate and ties in chords

On 11-05-30 03:12 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Hi, I am using lilypond 2.13.62 now. The following example seems to show that \articulate has a problem with tied chords, Or am I doing something wrong ? ---8<-- \version "2.13.62" music = \relative c&#

problem with articulate and ties in chords

Hi, I am using lilypond 2.13.62 now. The following example seems to show that \articulate has a problem with tied chords, Or am I doing something wrong ? ---8<-- \version "2.13.62" music = \relative c' { c2~ c | 2 | } \score { \new

Re: suggestion for articulate

> "Graham" == Graham Percival writes: Graham> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:54:53PM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: David> A fixed ratio seems a mistake to me: like optical scaling of David> fonts, the ratio should depend on the length of the note as David> well as the speed of the piece. And one doe

Re: suggestion for articulate

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:54:53PM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote: > David> A fixed ratio seems a mistake to me: like optical scaling of > David> fonts, the ratio should depend on the length of the note as > David> well as the speed of the piece. And one does not want to have > David> chords end early i

Re: suggestion for articulate

> "David" == David Kastrup writes: David> A fixed ratio seems a mistake to me: like optical scaling of David> fonts, the ratio should depend on the length of the note as David> well as the speed of the piece. And one does not want to have David> chords end early in one voice merely because

Re: suggestion for articulate

Peter Chubb writes: >> "胡海鹏" == 胡海鹏 <- Hu Haipeng > writes: > > 胡海鹏> Hello, Before I make a 16 track midi to show the remaining bug > 胡海鹏> on midi output in the recent devel versions, I'll suggest an > 胡海鹏> improvement upon articulate.ly. I changed the following line, > 胡海鹏> and the non-slur

Re: suggestion for articulate

> "胡海鹏" == 胡海鹏 <- Hu Haipeng > writes: 胡海鹏> Hello, Before I make a 16 track midi to show the remaining bug 胡海鹏> on midi output in the recent devel versions, I'll suggest an 胡海鹏> improvement upon articulate.ly. I changed the following line, 胡海鹏> and the non-slurred music sounds more natural, w

suggestion for articulate

Hello, Before I make a 16 track midi to show the remaining bug on midi output in the recent devel versions, I'll suggest an improvement upon articulate.ly. I changed the following line, and the non-slurred music sounds more natural, while the slurred music still gets more smooth: #(define ac:n

Re: New version of articulate available

2011/3/29 Peter Chubb : > There's now a new version of Articulate on the NICTA website. > > The only change is the licence --- this version (1.6) is released > under GPL version 3.0, so there should be no barrier to distributing > it with Lilypond. > > As usual,

Re: New version of articulate available

There's now a new version of Articulate on the NICTA website. The only change is the licence --- this version (1.6) is released under GPL version 3.0, so there should be no barrier to distributing it with Lilypond. As usual, it's available from http://nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articul

Re: New version of articulate available

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 04:08:18PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > >> The GPLv3 states under 5 "Conveying modified source versions" > > > > I don't see articulate.ly as a modified source version, unless I

Re: New version of articulate available

ure would likely be different from yours. > The *only* tricky bit, the only part of articulate that contains any > substantial IP, is calculating trill timings. And it's a real hack > full of mostly but not perfect heuristics, and should probably be > redesigned anyway. Heuristics

Re: New version of articulate available

PL. This would also be useful for other snippets/scheme/ly libraries. Currently we don't have a `contrib' tree. Moving articualte functionality into a performer (which I think is the right approach long-term) isn't a copyright issue, because you can't just copy the code (sch

Re: New version of articulate available

Graham Percival writes: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Peter Chubb writes: >> >> > I'll do it if I have to to get it merged, but i was hoping it wouldn't >> > be necessary. >> >> The GPLv3 states under 5 "Conveying modified source versions" > > I don't see

Re: New version of articulate available

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:46:21AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Peter Chubb writes: > > > I'll do it if I have to to get it merged, but i was hoping it wouldn't > > be necessary. > > The GPLv3 states under 5 "Conveying modified source versions" I don't see articulate.ly as a modified source ve

Re: New version of articulate available

On 11-03-21 04:46 AM, David Kastrup wrote: < snippage of licensing issues occureth> By one of those delightful synchronicities, the following came up in today's AWAD: usufruct *PRONUNCIATION:* (YOO-zuh-fruhkt, -suh-) *MEANING:* /noun/: The r

Re: New version of articulate available

erability", and if the > Graham> amount of "interlocked-ness" (how do we measure this?) of > Graham> articulate.ly means that it's a derivative work, then any > Graham> serious use of scheme functions in lilypond would > Graham> automatically mean that the mus

Re: New version of articulate available

quot; (how do we measure this?) of Graham> articulate.ly means that it's a derivative work, then any Graham> serious use of scheme functions in lilypond would Graham> automatically mean that the music must be GPLv3 or later. I wrote articulate in 2008. At that time, Lilypond was re

Re: New version of articulate available

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 04:23:12PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > > > The suggestion that a .ly file would somehow be a derivative work > > of lilypond is ridiculous. > > Depends on how interlocked and crossdependent it is with internals of > Lilypond and whether or not

Re: New version of articulate available

On 11-03-20 03:27 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: 2011/3/19 Federico Bruni: Il giorno ven, 18/03/2011 alle 16.54 +0100, Francisco Vila ha scritto: The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. there's a typo in line 76 of the patch: +etc., and take rallentendo and accele

Re: New version of articulate available

Graham Percival writes: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:24:42AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Not likely to work well. It is not even clear that Peter can >> release/distribute it under GPL version 2.0 unless it will work >> unmodified with a version of Lilypond released under GPL version 2.0. >>

Re: New version of articulate available

On 20 March 2011 15:39, Graham Percival wrote: > > So what? I have been pointing out that it would be easy to add > for 2 years. And on the more general topic of "useful scheme > functions it would be nice to include", I've been trying to > recruit interested workers since 2007. Nobody's been i

Re: New version of articulate available

Henning! Nice work so far! Would be nice to have those things too. How difficult would be to have precise and smooth cresc. and dim. within the same note? But in this case you would have to know the instrument, given that a piano could not change the dynamics unless the next note is played. At th

Re: New version of articulate available

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:07:09AM +0100, Xavier Scheuer wrote: > I'm glad that articulate is finally somewhat included officially into > LilyPond, since I asked for it 9 months ago So what? I have been pointing out that it would be easy to add for 2 years. And on the more gener

Re: New version of articulate available

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:24:42AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Not likely to work well. It is not even clear that Peter can > release/distribute it under GPL version 2.0 unless it will work > unmodified with a version of Lilypond released under GPL version 2.0. > If it doesn't, the question is w

Re: New version of articulate available

Francisco Vila writes: > 2011/3/20 Peter Chubb : >> On 20/03/2011, at 7:55 PM, Francisco Vila wrote: >>> I've not checked, but is the license compatible with that of lilypond? >>> A simple line stating "this file has the same license as the lilypond >>> package" would serve. >> >> It's released

Re: New version of articulate available

2011/3/19 Federico Bruni : > Il giorno ven, 18/03/2011 alle 16.54 +0100, Francisco Vila ha scritto: >> The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. > > there's a typo in line 76 of the patch: > > +etc., and take rallentendo and accelerando into

Re: New version of articulate available

n include it given that discrepancy. > I also assert my moral right to be identified as the original author of the > code, If your file says that, it will be respected. Don't bother about being a part of a commit done for another person. > Ultimately I expect all this not to be an i

Re: New version of articulate available

;>> problem with the approach.  But that's definitely how to begin. >> >> The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. > > I've not checked, but is the license compatible with that of lilypond? > A simple line stating "this file has

Re: New version of articulate available

gt; problem with the approach. But that's definitely how to begin. >> >> The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. > > I've not checked, but is the license compatible with that of lilypond? > A simple line stating "this file has the sam

Re: New version of articulate available

script, it is GNU General Public License, version 2. IIRC LilyPond is GNU GPL version 3. Maybe Peter could change its script license to version 2 or later or version 3, so it would be effectively compatible. I'm glad that articulate is finally somewhat included officially into LilyPond, since I

Re: New version of articulate available

certainly how I'd start going about this.  I >> haven't looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that >> approach when I see a patch.  Or other people might notice some >> problem with the approach.  But that's definitely how to begin. > > The attache

Re: New version of articulate available

s is probably not what you expect ... >> >> Why not? That's certainly how I'd start going about this. I >> haven't looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that >> approach when I see a patch. Or other people might notice some >> problem with th

Re: New version of articulate available

Il giorno ven, 18/03/2011 alle 16.54 +0100, Francisco Vila ha scritto: > The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. there's a typo in line 76 of the patch: +etc., and take rallentendo and accelerando into account. s/rallentendo/ral

Re: New version of articulate available

2011/3/18 Graham Percival : > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: >> The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. > > Looks pretty good, but I'd like to have a rietveld issue for > easier commenting. I will try to do that, I&#

Re: New version of articulate available

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:54:12PM +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: > The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. Looks pretty good, but I'd like to have a rietveld issue for easier commenting. > +and in the @code{\score} section do > + > +@example > +\unfol

Re: New version of articulate available

Francisco Vila wrote Friday, March 18, 2011 3:54 PM The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. Looks pretty good! My only comment is that it might be better to suggest two \score blocks, one for printing without \articulate and \midi, and one for playback with

Re: New version of articulate available

 I > haven't looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that > approach when I see a patch.  Or other people might notice some > problem with the approach.  But that's definitely how to begin. The attached patch includes and documents the Articulate script. -

Re: New version of articulate available

x27;t looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that approach when I see a patch. Or other people might notice some problem with the approach. But that's definitely how to begin. I wouldn’t make articulate default – I try it with every song I typeset and like the result not alway

Re: New version of articulate available

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:17:47AM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote: > Just adding articulate.ly in ly/ and giving one example in the docs > is probably not what you expect ... Why not? That's certainly how I'd start going about this. I haven't looked at it, so I might notice some problem with that approa

Re: New version of articulate available

Marc Hohl writes: > Am 18.03.2011 02:13, schrieb Graham Percival: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:56:05AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: >>> But let's stay on-topic: Keep up the good work with your articulate >>> script. Any chance articulate will be an integrate

Re: New version of articulate available

Am 18.03.2011 02:13, schrieb Graham Percival: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:56:05AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: But let's stay on-topic: Keep up the good work with your articulate script. Any chance articulate will be an integrated, built-in functionality in Lilypond in the future

Re: New version of articulate available

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:20:38PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2011/3/17 Graham Percival : > > I estimate it would take about 5 hours from a Frog.  I've been > > estimating this for the past few years, but nobody's even > > attempted to tackle it yet. > > It is a feature that already works...

Re: New version of articulate available

2011/3/17 Graham Percival : > I estimate it would take about 5 hours from a Frog.  I've been > estimating this for the past few years, but nobody's even > attempted to tackle it yet. > It is a feature that already works... would be nice to have! :-) Are there any downside? increased rendering ti

Re: New version of articulate available

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 01:56:05AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > But let's stay on-topic: Keep up the good work with your articulate > script. Any chance articulate will be an integrated, built-in > functionality in Lilypond in the future ? I estimate it would take abo

Re: New version of articulate available

ed me much more! But let's stay on-topic: Keep up the good work with your articulate script. Any chance articulate will be an integrated, built-in functionality in Lilypond in the future ? -- Martin___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-us

Re: New version of articulate available

> "Martin" == Martin Tarenskeen writes: Martin> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Peter Chubb wrote: >> (from Messiaen's `Abime des Oiseaux', bar 13) -- a smooth crescendo >> over almost the full range of the instrument. Martin> I love that piece ! Which is remarkable, since I hate most Martin> clarinet

Re: New version of articulate available

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Peter Chubb wrote: (from Messiaen's `Abime des Oiseaux', bar 13) -- a smooth crescendo over almost the full range of the instrument. I love that piece ! Which is remarkable, since I hate most clarinet music with a few exceptions including Mozart's Clarinet Concerto and

New version of articulate available

Version 1.5 of the Articulate scripts is now available from http://www.nicta.com.au/people/chubbp/articulate/ This version adds support for mordents --- thanks to Patrick Karl who reported the issue. The next big thing I'd like Lilypond to do is to handle dynamics in MIDI better. The pr

  1   2   >