Re: SUSE 9.3 and fontforge

that your new fontforge is installed somewhere where it's included in $PATH. /Mats Suzanne Blatt wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build Lilypond 2.5 as the one that came with SUSE 9.3 doesn't work. My problem is fontforge. The 'old' fontforge that came with SUSE has

Re: SUSE 9.3 and fontforge

Suzanne Blatt kirjoitti: Hello, I'm trying to build Lilypond 2.5 as the one that came with SUSE 9.3 doesn't work. My problem is fontforge. The 'old' fontforge that came with SUSE has been uninstalled, I found and downloaded the 'new' fontforge from the we

SUSE 9.3 and fontforge

Hello, I'm trying to build Lilypond 2.5 as the one that came with SUSE 9.3 doesn't work. My problem is fontforge. The 'old' fontforge that came with SUSE has been uninstalled, I found and downloaded the 'new' fontforge from the web but I cannot seem to get th

Re: make fails on 2.7.10, SuSE 9.3

Mats Bengtsson kirjoitti: Please don't annoy the lilypond-user mailing list with bug reports and specific questions related to the latest development version. I apologize. My purpose was to send that to lilypond-devel list. -mea culpa, sorry Tapio ___

Re: make fails on 2.7.10, SuSE 9.3

have sent bug reports. /Mats Tapio Tuovila wrote: Hi, 2.7.10 gives following error message on SuSE 9.3 (x86); all previous versions 2.7.x did compile all right, though. -Some new dependency? (BTW the error message looks similar with http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/20

make fails on 2.7.10, SuSE 9.3

Hi, 2.7.10 gives following error message on SuSE 9.3 (x86); all previous versions 2.7.x did compile all right, though. -Some new dependency? (BTW the error message looks similar with http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-09/msg00045.html ) Any ideas? My best, Tapio

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

Hi Han-Wen, Thanks for your help. On Saturday 03 September 2005 00:04, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > don't do that. instead, get the src rpm and do > > rpmbuild --rebuild foo.src.rpm > > then install what you built. I've downloaded guile-1.6.7 from the SUSE 9.3 source tr

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

Matt Wallis wrote: On Friday 02 September 2005 07:15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I suspect that there is still a guile 1.6.4 lingering around on your system. If so, get rid of it. I have just upgraded to guile 1.6.7 using an RPM I found on rpm.pbone.net (previously, I had built guile 1.6.7 f

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

On Friday 02 September 2005 07:15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > I suspect that there is still a guile 1.6.4 lingering around on your > system. If so, get rid of it. I have just upgraded to guile 1.6.7 using an RPM I found on rpm.pbone.net (previously, I had built guile 1.6.7 from source download

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

Matt Wallis writes: > I have installed the updated 2.6.3.1, but unfortunately I'm now back to the > "ERROR: In procedure hash-fold:" problem. That was to be expected, given that installing guile 1.6.7 did not fix it for you. I suspect that there is still a guile 1.6.4 lingering around on your s

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

On Wednesday 31 August 2005 13:46, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Matt Wallis writes: > >>     > >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00481.html > > > > As suggested here, I installed guile 1.6.7, but this did not fix the > > problem. > > Hmm, that is quite odd. Is it possibl

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

Matt Wallis writes: >>     http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-08/msg00481.html > > As suggested here, I installed guile 1.6.7, but this did not fix the problem. Hmm, that is quite odd. > I tried this, but now have a new error: > libguile.so.16: cannot open shared object

Re: Problem getting started (SuSE 9.2)

Jan, Many thanks for your suggestions. On Tuesday 30 August 2005 20:08, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Matt Wallis writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/home2/Music/Scores> lilypond test > > GNU LilyPond 2.6.3 > > ERROR: In procedure hash-fold: > > ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 3: ((# > > > Your h

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

On 7-Jun-05, at 2:13 AM, Robert Memering wrote: As for the one-line-staff bug: Any news? Did you reproduce it? I reproduced it in 2.5.27, but I didn't want to track it down at that time. I tried it again today (using 2.5.28), prepared to track it down, but it didn't occur. The template co

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2005 21:09 schrieb Graham Percival: > Well, yes. We can't figure out what went wrong without an > input file. Nevermind, I figured it out myself. You were right, I was actually doing something fancy. It was a bar-number trick that I took from one of the example files: \overri

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

On 5-Jun-05, at 4:24 AM, Robert Memering wrote: Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 23:49 schrieb Graham Percival: The attachment got cut off, but it looks like you're trying to do something fancy in scheme. In fact, the attachment isn't cut off. This is the output. If you're interested I can send you

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 23:49 schrieb Graham Percival: > > GNU LilyPond 2.5.27 > > »sicongieprens-neu.ly« wird verarbeitet > > Analysieren...sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: In expression > > (make-stencil-boxer 0.1 > > 0.25 ...): > > sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: Wrong number of arguments to # > make-sten

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

ad of five-line ones (this -at least- seems to be a bug of the unstable version because the score on page 48 of the 2.5 Manual, pdf version, shows the same phenomenon). Yes, seems that either that score is somehow broken or there is a bug in lilypond 2.5.27. On the other hand, for me the 2.5.27 o

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

On 4-Jun-05, at 10:25 AM, Robert Memering wrote: I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use, because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I still have several problems. One score doesn&#

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Robert Memering wrote: I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use, because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the other

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 06:27 schrieb Tapio Tuovila: > I'd like to second Graham's opinion. Compiling 2.5.2x goes smoothly on > suse 9.3; at least I have noticed no particular problem. And once you > use 2.5.x you need not worry about dvips -sort of things. I have deleted 2.4

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Robert Memering wrote: - I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4. - Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine. - The integrated production of ps and pdf fails. I get documents with many musical symbols missing and all wrong text fonts. - invoking dvips (and ps2pdf) manually works, but produces very

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

Robert Memering writes: > My problem: > > - I have SuSE 9.3, lilypond 2.4.4. > - Lilypond works, dvi and midi output is fine. > - The integrated production of ps and pdf fails. SUSE ships a broken LilyPond installation. Did you think of Solution: report bug to SUSE? Jan. -- Ja

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

instructions in the INSTALL directory, and if anything goes wrong, post here again. - Graham I'd like to second Graham's opinion. Compiling 2.5.2x goes smoothly on suse 9.3; at least I have noticed no particular problem. And once you use 2.5.x you need not worry about dvips -sort of

Re: lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

On 3-Jun-05, at 5:27 PM, Robert Memering wrote: Ok, it's just a matter of (mis-)configuration, then? Maybe, but I'm so tired of wasting my time searching archives, trying hundreds of promising "solutions" and still getting no results. Why do the Windows and Mac people always get "standalone inst

lilypond 2.4.4 package on suse 9.3: dvips problem

and "all-in-one-packages", while Unix/Linux users have to become experts to get their software running? This is the lilypond-*user* list and all the people are discussing kpathsea and mftrace internals that a decent, ordinary person would call Black Magic. I was very lucky that I first tr

SuSE 9.3 and fonts

Hi I had trouble with lilypond in SuSE 9.3, which now is solved thanks to Mats Bengtsson. This is the solution: cd /usr/share/lilypond/2.4.4/fonts/ mkdir map cd map ln -s ../../dvips/lilypond.map texhash Thanks again Mats! /Bo ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: Suse 9.2 and no lilypond-profile

oblem is that there is no lilypond-profile on the Suse 9.2 distribution. Does this mean I have to build Lilypond myself or is there another way to get it working? Thanks in advance, Rob ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org h

Suse 9.2 and no lilypond-profile

Hi, I am trying to get lilypond-book working to produce text books with musical phrases in it. So far I get stuck with the 'cannot find lilyponddefs' problem. As far as I could look it up in the archive the problem is that there is no lilypond-profile on the Suse 9.2 distribution.

Re: Lilypond not anymore in Linux Suse 9.2

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:22:46PM +0100, Francois Planiol-Auger wrote: > ... that the terrible new I just discovered :-( > > I've already sent a mail about my disappointment to Suse. You are wrong. SuSE 9.2 ships with LilyPond 2.2.6 *on the DVD* (and the RPMs will be put on their

Lilypond not anymore in Linux Suse 9.2

... that the terrible new I just discovered :-( I've already sent a mail about my disappointment to Suse. Please do all the same!!! François ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Suse 9.1

Hello, I am running Suse 9.1, and have installed the latest lilypond binary I could find: 2.0.3. Any idea where I can find a newer one? Thanks! Raven -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: LilyPond on SuSE 9.0?

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 21:40, Tony Willoughby wrote: > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 17:21, Roland Goretzki wrote: > > Hello list, hello Jobst, > > > > You wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I am using SuSE 9.0 and want to try LilyPond. SuSE 9.0 is not listed >

Re: LilyPond on SuSE 9.0?

On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 17:21, Roland Goretzki wrote: > Hello list, hello Jobst, > > You wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am using SuSE 9.0 and want to try LilyPond. SuSE 9.0 is not listed among > > the > > platforms on the download page. Is there a version whic

Re: LilyPond on SuSE 9.0?

Hello list, hello Jobst, You wrote: > Hi, > I am using SuSE 9.0 and want to try LilyPond. SuSE 9.0 is not listed among > the > platforms on the download page. Is there a version which I can try under SuSE > 9.0? As far as I know, there might be a LilyPond-version on the SuSE

LilyPond on SuSE 9.0?

Hi, I am using SuSE 9.0 and want to try LilyPond. SuSE 9.0 is not listed among the platforms on the download page. Is there a version which I can try under SuSE 9.0? Thanks in advance! Jobst Harders ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

On Wed Jul 07, 2004 at 02:06:30PM +0200, Thomas Scharkowski wrote: > When I run "make install" I get the following error messages: > > ./out/feta11tfm does not exist. > make[1]:***[local-install-outfiles] Fehler 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/.../lilypond-2.2.3/mf' > make: *** [install] Fehl

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

When I run "make install" I get the following error messages: ./out/feta11tfm does not exist. make[1]:***[local-install-outfiles] Fehler 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/.../lilypond-2.2.3/mf' make: *** [install] Fehler 2 And "make install" did not create a "scm" directory. I have run the "clea

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

Thomas Scharkowski wrote: Thomas Scharkowski wrote: I guess that you basically did ./configure make make install That's what I did. I hope you logged in as root when you did 'make install', otherwise you don't have any access rights in /usr/local/share/. Yes, I was root. I finally copied the missi

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

> Thomas Scharkowski wrote: > >>I guess that you basically did > >>./configure > >>make > >>make install > > > > That's what I did. > > I hope you logged in as root when you did 'make install', > otherwise you don't have any access rights in /usr/local/share/. Yes, I was root. I finally copied th

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

Thomas Scharkowski wrote: I guess that you basically did ./configure make make install That's what I did. I hope you logged in as root when you did 'make install', otherwise you don't have any access rights in /usr/local/share/. ___ lilypond-user maili

RE: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

> I guess that you basically did > ./configure > make > make install That's what I did. > which means that lily.scm should be installed in > /usr/local/share/lilypond/2.2.3/scm/lily.scm No scm directory there! > > Also, the command > lilypond-bin --help --verbose > should say > local_lilypond_d

Re: lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

ld it using the RPM preparation tools, I know that there has been some problems in the SuSe RPM, at least in earlier version. /Mats Thomas Scharkowski wrote: Hello list, maybe this is more of a linux question, but I dare to ask. I have to admit that I am new to linux, but I thought: Just try it.

lilypond 2.2.3 on Suse 9.1

Hello list, maybe this is more of a linux question, but I dare to ask. I have to admit that I am new to linux, but I thought: Just try it. So I followed the instructions and compiled lilypond-2.2.3 on SuSe 9.1.. Everything seemed to work correctly, great! Typing "lilypond --ver"

Re: problem installing for SuSe

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to install Lilypond 2.2.1. I'm running Suse 9.0 and am getting an error stating that mftrace is not found. I do have mfrace installed. I've attached the make output. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. My Hardware Specs: Athalon 1700xp A

problem installing for SuSe

I'm trying to install Lilypond 2.2.1. I'm running Suse 9.0 and am getting an error stating that mftrace is not found. I do have mfrace installed. I've attached the make output. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. My Hardware Specs: Athalon 1700xp Asus motherbo

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.

[please keep this on the list] Ken Kupisz writes: Hi Ken, > Did you solve the Lilypond install? I have the same error message. > Thanks for any help. I'm not sure what you're talking about. Han-Wen integrated patches from SUSE, and I made af fix, but I do not have a SUSE box

Suse 8.1, was:

In principle, I think that RedHat packages (RPMs) are compatible with Suse. However, there's a risk that you need to update a number of other packages as well, especially Guile. /Mats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I have a short question. I have Suse-Linux 8.1 on my computer and I w

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.

le' > > LILYPONDPREFIX: ' > > You may have two conflicting installations (or leftovers) of lilypond > installed; one in /usr and one in /usr/local. You should remove one > of those, and possibly reinstall the other. Hi Suzie, I've downloaded the SUSE package, and

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.

vers) of lilypond installed; one in /usr and one in /usr/local. You should remove one of those, and possibly reinstall the other. Wait a minute, what does the command which lilypond say? It almost looks like lilypond was built to be installed in /usr/local, but got installed in /usr af

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.1

Suzanne E. Blatt writes: > I've recently upgraded to SUSE 9 which came with Lilypond 1.8.1. > Problem is, it won't run. I get the following error message when I > type 'lilypond' > > GNU LilyPond 1.8.1ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: > ERROR: Unabl

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.1

A workaround for these problems with the SUSE 9 packages is probably to set the environment variable LILYPONDPREFIX to /usr/share/lilypond/1.8.1/ /Mats Suzanne E. Blatt wrote: Howdy, I've recently upgraded to SUSE 9 which came with Lilypond 1.8.1. Problem is, it won't run.

SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Howdy, > > I've recently upgraded to SUSE 9 which came with Lilypond 1.8.1. > Problem is, it won't run. I get the following error message when I > type 'lilypond' In that case, you should report a bug with SuSE, who seem to ha

Re: SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.1

Suzanne E. Blatt writes: > Howdy, > > I've recently upgraded to SUSE 9 which came with Lilypond 1.8.1. > Problem is, it won't run. I get the following error message when I > type 'lilypond' Did you see this thread? http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lily

SUSE 9, Lilypond 1.8.1

Howdy, I've recently upgraded to SUSE 9 which came with Lilypond 1.8.1. Problem is, it won't run. I get the following error message when I type 'lilypond' GNU LilyPond 1.8.1ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path: ERROR: Unable to find file "lily.scm" in load p

Re: Trouble with stock SuSE install

59:44 -0500 From: Beldon Dominello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Trouble with stock SuSE install To: Lilypond User forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" My apologies if this has been covered before but I c

Trouble with stock SuSE install

My apologies if this has been covered before but I can't seem to get the stock SuSE 9 version (1.8.1) to work. After installation, I type the command: ly2dvi -P test2.ly only to get the error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ly2dvi", line 104, in ? impor

lilypond 2.0 for SuSE-Linux 9.0

Here is my problem: I'd like to use lilypond version 2.0 (or higher) on my system using SuSE-Linux9.0. For there is no compiled package for this target on your server: do I really have to compile the program myself? Dr. G. Buehrle -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Me

Re: Suse

Thomas Willhalm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > License:Other License(s), see package That's odd? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.

Re: Suse

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know whether the latest release of Suse Linux includes > a more up to date version of Lilypond than the previous one ? Why not check for yourself: <http://www.suse.de/de/private/products/suse_linux/i386/packages_professional/lilypond.html> Gree

Suse

Does anyone know whether the latest release of Suse Linux includes a more up to date version of Lilypond than the previous one ? Cheers, Darius. - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp

Suse Linux

Hi, does nobody want to make a package for Suse Linux? Thanks! Peter ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: Errors building 1.7.22 & SuSE 87.2 (gcc 3.3)

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > The flex that you use is not compatible with your g++. > Update your installation or send a bug report to SuSE. Many thanks - I upgraded to flex 2.5.31 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lex and the "make all" completed. Now to complete the in

Re: Errors building 1.7.22 & SuSE 87.2 (gcc 3.3)

Hans Forbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm attempting to build lilypond 1.7.22 on SuSE 8.2 Pro. > > The results of the seconds attempt to "make all" are included at the end > (with sincere apologies to all for size). My configuration is: > > gcc 3.3

Errors building 1.7.22 & SuSE 87.2 (gcc 3.3)

I'm attempting to build lilypond 1.7.22 on SuSE 8.2 Pro. The results of the seconds attempt to "make all" are included at the end (with sincere apologies to all for size). My configuration is: gcc 3.3 python 2.2.2 guile 1.6.2 gnu make 3.80 flex 2.5.4a bison 1.875a SuSE com

Re: Error compiling - SuSE 8.2/Lily 1.7.20

On Fri, 30 May 2003 13:06:23 -0600 Hans Forbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just getting around to installing Lilypond 1.7 on my new SuSE 8.2 > environment. I've encountered the error listed. SuSE 8.2 has extremely > recent dev tools which may cause the problems. > >

Error compiling - SuSE 8.2/Lily 1.7.20

Just getting around to installing Lilypond 1.7 on my new SuSE 8.2 environment. I've encountered the error listed. SuSE 8.2 has extremely recent dev tools which may cause the problems. I've been upgrading the various tools described on the Lilypond development build site to try to re

Re: Errors building 1.7.13 - SUSE

That's fixed it. (For others with this problem, 1.875a is the alpha version at GNU.) Many thanks /Hans Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > Environment: SUSE 8.0 kernel, + GCC 2.95.3, Python 2.2.2, Bison 1.875, > > bison-1.875 is foe; use 1.875a or newer (

Re: Errors building 1.7.13 - SUSE

Hans Forbrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Environment: SUSE 8.0 kernel, + GCC 2.95.3, Python 2.2.2, Bison 1.875, bison-1.875 is foe; use 1.875a or newer (or <= 1.35). Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.

Errors building 1.7.13 - SUSE

I'm running into some issues building 1.7.13 ... error compiling lily/out/parser.cc ... ideas/comments appreciated. /Hans Sources: downloaded from Canadian mirror & Lilypond to verify Environment: SUSE 8.0 kernel, + GCC 2.95.3, Python 2.2.2, Bison 1.875, Guile 1.6.3, Flex 2.5.4a (repo

Re: problems compiling 1.4.9 on linux suse 6.2

> try this: [...] that works great! thank you... > Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/ david ___ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: problems compiling 1.4.9 on linux suse 6.2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > edit `mf/GNUmakefile', removing the line saying `PFA_FILES='. > > no go: try this: --- GNUmakefile~Thu Nov 29 14:03:25 2001 +++ GNUmakefile Tue Feb 12 10:40:19 2002 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ depth = .. -STEPMAKE_TEMPLATES=metafont metapost asciifont install inst