Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2005 06:27 schrieb Tapio Tuovila: > I'd like to second Graham's opinion. Compiling 2.5.2x goes smoothly on > suse 9.3; at least I have noticed no particular problem. And once you > use 2.5.x you need not worry about dvips -sort of things.
I have deleted 2.4.4 and built 2.5.27 on SuSE now, and you are right: compilation went quite smoothly. But it is not much use, because none of my old 2.4.x scores work. I used convert-ly, but I still have several problems. One score doesn't compile, and the other ones have one-line-staves instead of five-line ones (this -at least- seems to be a bug of the unstable version because the score on page 48 of the 2.5 Manual, pdf version, shows the same phenomenon). So, I think that I will wait for a new stable version, because I am fed up with spending days on trying to get things running. By the way, thanks to Bo Herlin, but this "solution" didn't work for me (I had even tried similar soft-link solutions myself before). If any of the developers is interested, see below for the output of the score that doesn't compile. Regards, Robert lilypond sicongieprens-neu.ly GNU LilyPond 2.5.27 »sicongieprens-neu.ly« wird verarbeitet Analysieren...sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: In expression (make-stencil-boxer 0.1 0.25 ...): sicongieprens-neu.ly:1:48: Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure make-stencil-boxer (thickness padding callback)> _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
