>
> > Well, yes, you should… but I don't think that's the proper solution to the
> > problem you've stated (as I understand it).
> >
> > 1. Put all your "global" data (time signatures, rehearsal marks, tempi,
> > etc.) in a single variable.
>
On 16/10/2022 16:47, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
I guess I should just learn how to do tags :-)
Well, yes, you should… but I don't think that's the proper solution to the
problem you've stated (as I understand it).
1. Put all your "global" data (time si
Hi Kenneth,
> I guess I should just learn how to do tags :-)
Well, yes, you should… but I don't think that's the proper solution to the
problem you've stated (as I understand it).
1. Put all your "global" data (time signatures, rehearsal marks, tempi, etc.)
in a s
On 16/10/2022 00:02, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
Maybe I just should have kept my mouth shut 😄
Nah. You just have to talk to the penguin.
Talking to ANYTHING often helps you work your way through a problem, you
just talked to the list (I sometimes do the same), and DON'T feel a fool
for it.
Wha
Maybe I just should have kept my mouth shut :-)
I have rehearsal marks in both parts. In the full score only the top
part will show the rehearsal marks. When I display the parts
separately, they will both have the rehearsal marks.
So, I just need to have more coffee (even though I don't
I guess I should just learn how to do tags :-)
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 3:24 PM Kenneth Wolcott
wrote:
>
> HI;
>
> I'm engraving a Trombone Duet. There are rehearsal marks. I'd like
> to engrave both parts as a score, both parts having rehearsal marks
> displa
HI;
I'm engraving a Trombone Duet. There are rehearsal marks. I'd like
to engrave both parts as a score, both parts having rehearsal marks
displayed, not just the first part.
How to do this? Lilypond 2.22.2
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
> Rehearsal and tempo marks should be aligned
> on the selected staff as if they were part of it, see attached
> example.
I forgot to also move `Metronome_mark_engraver` in my example, but it
doesn't make a visual difference here.
Werner
>> the snippet below demonstrates that top-staff lyrics are
>> incorrectly positioned above rehearsal marks if the engraver for
>> the latter is moved to another context (I need that in a full score
>> with rehearsal marks printed simultaneously at three differe
> I think you likely want to move the Mark_engraver to a kind of
> MarkLine context instead.
Well, the problem is that such a context needs the
`Axis_group_engraver`, which tries to align stuff horizontally on a
line. I don't want that. Rehearsal and tempo marks should be aligned
on the selecte
Le 01/06/2022 à 11:31, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
Dear LilyPonders,
the snippet below demonstrates that top-staff lyrics are incorrectly
positioned above rehearsal marks if the engraver for the latter is
moved to another context (I need that in a full score with rehearsal
marks printed
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 11:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
> Dear LilyPonders,
>
>
> the snippet below demonstrates that top-staff lyrics are incorrectly
> positioned above rehearsal marks if the engraver for the latter is
> moved to another context (I need that in a full scor
Dear LilyPonders,
the snippet below demonstrates that top-staff lyrics are incorrectly
positioned above rehearsal marks if the engraver for the latter is
moved to another context (I need that in a full score with rehearsal
marks printed simultaneously at three different vertical positions
Jean, thank you! This should be the default behavior, imo...
Thank you Jean !
Le 24/09/2021 à 15:03, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 23/09/2021 à 23:34, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 23/09/2021 à 00:47, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
Perhaps you want the tempo mark to start on
the first note rather than the time signature:
Not really... I'd like to have the tempo m
Le 23/09/2021 à 23:34, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 23/09/2021 à 00:47, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
Perhaps you want the tempo mark to start on
the first note rather than the time signature:
Not really... I'd like to have the tempo mark aligning to the time
signature, but shifting a little horizonta
Re,
Le 24/09/2021 à 01:34, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> Le 23/09/2021 à 00:47, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
>>> Perhaps you want the tempo mark to start on
>>> the first note rather than the time signature:
>> Not really... I'd like to have the tempo mark aligning to the time
>> signature, but shifting
Hello,
Le 23/09/2021 à 01:13, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
(...)
Try the \markLengthOn command described here:(...)
I was just struggling while editing a score with
- a rehearsal mark on the first bar (I know the composer, he likes to
hear "Let's start from the beginning, first measure, letter
Le 23/09/2021 à 00:47, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
Perhaps you want the tempo mark to start on
the first note rather than the time signature:
Not really... I'd like to have the tempo mark aligning to the time signature,
but shifting a little horizontally if it collides with a rehearsal mark.
Here
> Perhaps you want the tempo mark to start on
> the first note rather than the time signature:
Not really... I'd like to have the tempo mark aligning to the time signature,
but shifting a little horizontally if it collides with a rehearsal mark.
Le 23/09/2021 à 00:09, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
Try the \markLengthOn command described here:
That's what I was looking for. Merci, Jean!
Actually, this doesn't work when there's a time signature in the same bar...
{
r1
\markLengthOn
\mark \default
\tempo 4 = 120
\time 3/4
>> Try the \markLengthOn command described here:
> That's what I was looking for. Merci, Jean!
Actually, this doesn't work when there's a time signature in the same bar...
{
r1
\markLengthOn
\mark \default
\tempo 4 = 120
\time 3/4
\repeat unfold 4 c''4
}
> Try the \markLengthOn command described here:
That's what I was looking for. Merci, Jean!
Le 22/09/2021 à 22:25, Nuno Trocado a écrit :
When rehearsal marks and tempo markings coincide in the same bar, the
rehearsal mark is shifted slightly upwards to avoid a collision, and
ends up in an awkward position...
See "B" in the following example:
\version "2.19.55"
When rehearsal marks and tempo markings coincide in the same bar, the rehearsal
mark is shifted slightly upwards to avoid a collision, and ends up in an
awkward position...
See "B" in the following example:
\version "2.19.55"
\score{
{
r1
\mark \default
\tem
> On Dec 5, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Aaron Hill wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-05 10:30 am, Paul Scott wrote:
>> Is there a way to put square brackets around a rehearsal mark (bar
>> number if relevant)?
>
> bracketify-stencil should do what you need. Here's a wrapper for it:
Works perfectly! Thank you,
On 2020-12-05 10:30 am, Paul Scott wrote:
Is there a way to put square brackets around a rehearsal mark (bar
number if relevant)?
bracketify-stencil should do what you need. Here's a wrapper for it:
\version "2.20.0"
bracketify =
#(define-music-function
(grob-path axis thick protrusi
Is there a way to put square brackets around a rehearsal mark (bar number if
relevant)?
TIA,
Paul
Did the trick, thank you very much!
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, 16:13 Aaron Hill, wrote:
> On 2020-10-19 12:00 am, Adam Griggs wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > This has me stumped. I've been digging for hours.
> >
> >\version "2.21.7"
> >
> >global = {
> > \skip 1*24
> > \mark \d
On 2020-10-19 12:00 am, Adam Griggs wrote:
Hello again,
This has me stumped. I've been digging for hours.
\version "2.21.7"
global = {
\skip 1*24
\mark \default
\skip 1*12
\mark \default
\skip 1*12
}
music = \relative c'' {
\compress
Hello again,
This has me stumped. I've been digging for hours.
\version "2.21.7"
global = {
\skip 1*24
\mark \default
\skip 1*12
\mark \default
\skip 1*12
}
music = \relative c'' {
\compressMMRests
R1*48
}
\new Staff <<
Greetings All,
Perhaps I have hit a bug in 2.21? When ALL staves of a StaffGroup
happen to be empty within a particular system, the rehearsal letter
continues to appear and at the top of the system. Below is code meant
to render the result.
\version "2.21"
music = \repeat unfold 5 {
\repeat un
the appropriate
> staff contexts - that is, in the uppermost staff of each instrument
> family. Furthermore, in order to reduce space, I have invoked
> \RemoveEmptyStaves in the staff context of the layout block. However,
> there are then many occasions when rehearsal marks naturally do not
>
; staff contexts - that is, in the uppermost staff of each instrument
> family. Furthermore, in order to reduce space, I have invoked
> \RemoveEmptyStaves in the staff context of the layout block. However,
> there are then many occasions when rehearsal marks naturally do not
> ap
. Furthermore, in order to reduce space, I have invoked
\RemoveEmptyStaves in the staff context of the layout block. However,
there are then many occasions when rehearsal marks naturally do not
appear, because the relevant staff is appropriately hidden. In fact, I
have entire pages where no rehearsal
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5621/
>>
>> I would have preferred to have it printed over an "imaginary bar
>> line", see issue 1150.
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1150/
>
> I don't object. Honestly, I don't care where it is positioned as
> long i
-- Forwarded message --
> From: Werner LEMBERG
> To: pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 23:30:34 +0100 (CET)
> Subject: Re: horizontal position of rehearsal marks at start of system
>
> >>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5621/
>
> I would have preferred to have it printed over an "imaginary bar
> line", see issue 1150.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1150/
I don't object. Honestly, I don't care where it is positioned as long
it is not l
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 12:53, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> See
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5621/
>
Hi Werner,
hi all,
I would have preferred to have it printed over an "imaginary bar line", see
issue 1150.
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1150/
Cheers,
Xavi
>>> how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal
>>> marks at the beginning of a line? As can be seen in the attached
>>> image, the rehearsal mark gets shifted up because it would
>>> otherwise collide with the bar number. Consequently,
how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal marks
at the beginning of a line? As can be seen in the attached image,
the rehearsal mark gets shifted up because it would otherwise
collide with the bar number. Consequently, I would like to have the
default position shifted to
> how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal marks
> at the beginning of a line? As can be seen in the attached image,
> the rehearsal mark gets shifted up because it would otherwise
> collide with the bar number. Consequently, I would like to have the
> d
>> how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal
>> marks at the beginning of a line? As can be seen in the attached
>> image, the rehearsal mark gets shifted up because it would
>> otherwise collide with the bar number. Consequently, I would lik
X-offset = #.5 % <= ??
\once\override Score.RehearsalMark.X-offset = 3.5
c'
}
Cheers,
Pierre
Le dim. 24 nov. 2019 à 22:15, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
> Folks,
>
>
> how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal marks
> at the beginning of a line? As
Folks,
how can I control the default horizontal position of rehearsal marks
at the beginning of a line? As can be seen in the attached image, the
rehearsal mark gets shifted up because it would otherwise collide
with the bar number. Consequently, I would like to have the default
position
Thank you Malte!! That's perfect!
g.
On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 08:36, Malte Meyn wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.05.19 um 07:48 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
> > How I can move a bit on the left the rehearsal mark "A" to make it
> > taking less vertical space?
>
> I’d use X-offset:
>
> \override Score.RehearsalMark.X-
Am 05.05.19 um 07:48 schrieb Gianmaria Lari:
How I can move a bit on the left the rehearsal mark "A" to make it
taking less vertical space?
I’d use X-offset:
\override Score.RehearsalMark.X-offset = 1
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@g
Sorry to ask this basic question.
How I can move a bit on the left the rehearsal mark "A" to make it taking
less vertical space?
\version "2.21.0"
{
\ottava 1 a'''1 1 1 1 \break
\mark A 1 1 1 1^3 \break
}
Thank you, g.
___
lilypond-user mailing lis
Hi Aaron
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> >
> > \mark produces RehearsalMark grobs. These are usually at the \Score
> > level, so you can either \override where you use \mark, or you can do
> > it within \layout:
> >
> >
> > \version "2.19.82"
> > \layout { \context { \S
On 2019-03-06 2:48 am, Aaron Hill wrote:
On 2019-03-06 2:37 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Hi List,
also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for
me):
is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default"
character?
Mine aren't much larger than regular text mark
On 2019-03-06 2:37 am, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Hi List,
also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for
me):
is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default"
character?
Mine aren't much larger than regular text markups, and I'd like to have
some control ov
Hi List,
also on this issue (I still have Roman numerals, which works fine for me):
is there a way to format the size/weight of the "\mark \default" character?
Mine aren't much larger than regular text markups, and I'd like to have
some control over the presentation.
Cheers,
A
On Wed, Oct 24, 2
PS- update: I figured out the problem, so now it's resolved (and in the
process dropped an \include that was loading a whole bunch of libraries I
turned out not to need, saving on compile time as well).
Thanks again!
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:39 PM N. Andrew Walsh
wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Ben
>
> fo
Hi Thomas, Ben
for some reason, neither of your codes seem to work: I always get arabic
numerals in a box if I use \mark \default. I think something is overriding
that setting elsewhere in my config files; I'll try to track it down. The
MWE Ben sent works just as I want it to on its own, but not i
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Ben :
> This should be what you need (see attached)
We do have 'number-format', so one could do:
#(define-public (format-roman-mark-numbers mark context)
(make-bold-markup (number-format 'roman-upper mark)))
#(define-public (format-boxed-roman-mark-n
Am Mi., 24. Okt. 2018 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb Ben :
>
> On 10/24/2018 10:39 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Based on my reading of scm/translation.functions.scm, I have no idea
> why the following should not work:
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \relative c'' {
> \set Score.markFormatter = #(format-mark-gen
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Hi List,
is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client
wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
<>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } }
doesn't work
On 10/24/2018 10:39 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:41 AM N. Andrew Walsh
wrote:
Hi List,
is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants Roman
numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
<>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-f
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:41 AM N. Andrew Walsh
wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants
> Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
>
> <>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bol
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Hi List,
is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client
wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
<>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } }
doesn't work
On 10/24/2018 9:40 AM, N. Andrew Walsh wrote:
Hi List,
is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client
wants Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
<>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } }
doesn't work
Hi Andrew,
You could try :
{
\mark \markup \box "IV"
c'4
}
HTH
Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 à 09:41, N. Andrew Walsh
a écrit :
>
> Hi List,
>
> is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants
> Roman numerals, and the workaround I've bee
Hi List,
is there any other available format for rehearsal marks? My client wants
Roman numerals, and the workaround I've been using:
<>^\markup { \raise #4 \right-align \abs-fontsize #16 \bold { "IV" } }
doesn't work if the voice containing it is resting at that poin
to do this, but
Staff_collecting_engraver doesn’t act the way it should, namely still
placing the rehearsal marks and tempo marks above the topmost staff of
the system, regardless of where the engraver was consisted.
That’s the reason for even writing snippet 1010.
Best, Simon
Hi Rick,
I think snippet 1010 is a bit overly complicated for this purpose: the new
context MarkLine there is just needed because they don't want rehearsal
marks above the top stave.
The basic trick behind all is that Rehearsal Marks normally are defined in
the Score context, i.e. they go o
Greetings all,
Sorry if this is a duplicate, the first time didn't seem to go through.
I tried to use a snippet from the LSR to add rehearsal marks above each
StaffGroup.
It nearly works as desired, but I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong in two
areas:
1) The vertical
Kieren,
I felt a little intimidated by the significant snippet you were probably
thinking of. But, Hwaen provided a sufficient hack for my small ensemble
music. :) Thanks! I'll look into that other hack when I feel a little less
intimidated. :/
--
Josh
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Kieren Mac
Thank you Hwaen: This was exactly what I was looking for!
--
Josh
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
> Greetings Josh,
>
> In your \layout block, include this to allow you more flexibility with
> your tempo and rehearsal markings:
>
> \context {
> \Score
>
My recommendation is to use a MarkLine context, as in this snippet:
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1010
You might need to modify the exact definition of MarkLine depending on your
needs.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/print-rehearsal-marks-in
Hi Joshua,
> How can I force Lilypond do print tempo marks in multiple places? e.g. at the
> top of the vocal section and at the top of the keyboard accompaniment.
Search the archives and LSR for "ScoreMarks" and/or "MarkLine" — you'll find
lots of hints and templates.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
Greetings Josh,
In your \layout block, include this to allow you more flexibility with
your tempo and rehearsal markings:
\context {
\Score
\remove Metronome_mark_engraver
\remove Mark_engraver
}
Then, in the approriate staves, include this block
Elaine Gould recommends that rehearsal and tempo marks be printed in
multiple places in addition to the top of the systems.
How can I force Lilypond do print tempo marks in multiple places? e.g. at
the top of the vocal section and at the top of the keyboard accompaniment.
Thanks!
--
Josh
hello list,
when using the (old) edition-engraver to add Rehearsal marks, in v. 2.19.60,
writing a Mark with a specific #(number), this is ignored, and the first
mark is displayed as "A".
In v. 2.19.58 (others not tested) the behaviour is as expected.
confused greetings,
Arne P.
ima
: Peter Toye
To: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Is there any way of getting multiple rehearsal marks?
Phil,
Thanks. That's pretty good. Having them in boxes would be nice but not
necessary. I'll stick with what you've
Re: Is there any way of getting multiple rehearsal marks?Try following the
links I gave. It shows how to do markup in boxes.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Peter Toye
To: Phil Holmes ; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 12:11 PM
Subject: Re
ssage -
From: Peter Toye
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 10:58 AM
Subject: Is there any way of getting multiple rehearsal marks?
I an trying to typeset a score with two different rehearsal mark sequences. The
snippet below gives interesting results! Not only the
Is there any way of getting multiple rehearsal marks?Not sure if this is what
you want, but is a simple way:
\relative c'' {
c1 |
c \mark \markup \center-column { "A" " " "B" } |
c
}
See
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=735
and
http://lsr.di.
I an trying to typeset a score with two different rehearsal mark sequences. The
snippet below gives interesting results! Not only the error messages:
D:/Peter/Music/Lilypond/Bugs/Fingering font.ly:9:22: warning: Two simultaneous
mark events, junking this one
c1| \mark #20
Hi Thomas,
Thank you very much for taking the time to explain it. I made the
change you suggested.
Kevin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2016-11-20 6:53 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
> Hi All,
>
> The behaviour I am seeing is very strange. I have done my best to
> reduce it to as little code as possible (which is why it looks a bit
> strange), but I can't find anything more I can remove without making
> the problem suddenly disappear. Ple
Hi All,
The behaviour I am seeing is very strange. I have done my best to
reduce it to as little code as possible (which is why it looks a bit
strange), but I can't find anything more I can remove without making
the problem suddenly disappear. Please accept my apologies that this
is not a very min
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:33:44 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> My contention there was that the volta construction can produce the
> correct score and the correct midi when applied correctly (ie to all
> the voices).
How do you think I produced correct scores and MIDI for the last 20 years?
> I don't
David Wright writes:
> On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 17:20:09 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote:
>>
>> I change my remark to: "Specifying the structure of a score in
>> \global is wonderful, it just doesn't play nice with MIDI, because no
>> voice can impose a MIDI repeat structure on any other."
>
> I don't
just
> > doesn't work with midi."
>
> There is something called the principle of least surprise. I can put bars,
> rehearsal marks, time signatures, repeats in \global and they all end up
> nicely in all staves of the printed output.
>
> Then it surprises me that
h midi."
>
> There is something called the principle of least surprise. I can put bars,
> rehearsal marks, time signatures, repeats in \global and they all end up
> nicely in all staves of the printed output.
Bars, rehearsal marks, time signatures are all isolated events. A
repeat _
east surprise. I can put bars,
rehearsal marks, time signatures, repeats in \global and they all end up
nicely in all staves of the printed output.
Then it surprises me that they do not all end up nicely in the midi — in
particular, the repeats do not. So my first thought is "something d
On Mon 15 Aug 2016 at 09:18:57 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what
> > you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices
> > are just Voices, aren't they
Mark Knoop writes:
> At 10:32 on 15 Aug 2016, Johan Vromans wrote:
>>On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200
>>David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by
>>> changing the bar line type, ...
>>
>>That is the explanation of the current behaviour.
>>
>>W
Johan Vromans writes:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by changing
>> the bar line type, ...
>
> That is the explanation of the current behaviour.
>
> What I want to say is that it would be nice if instea
At 10:32 on 15 Aug 2016, Johan Vromans wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200
>David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by
>> changing the bar line type, ...
>
>That is the explanation of the current behaviour.
>
>What I want to say is that it wou
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:22:14 +0200
David Kastrup wrote:
> That's not really surprising. The "repeats are shown" just by changing
> the bar line type, ...
That is the explanation of the current behaviour.
What I want to say is that it would be nice if instead it would
be like the repeats were a
Johan Vromans writes:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
>> This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what
>> you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices
>> are just Voices, aren't they?
>>
>> Anyway, the repeat structure has
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:45:51 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> This is true, they are not. In fact, I don't quite understand what
> you mean by "applying" \global "to the music parts". All the Voices
> are just Voices, aren't they?
>
> Anyway, the repeat structure has to be in all the parts
> as summa
On Sat 13 Aug 2016 at 10:09:11 (+0200), Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:58:10 -0700
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
I can't speak to ScoreMarks as I haven't understood it or
tried it out yet.
> > % Score for midi only
> > \score {
> > <<
> > \new Staff
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:58:10 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> % Score for midi only
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff << \global \fluteIPart >>
For midi, \unfoldRepeats is necessary.
Last time I tried, the repeats (in \global) were note applied to the music
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:58:08PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:21:22 -0700
> "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
>
> > global = {
> > \tempo "Allegro" 4 = 120
> > s1*16
> > \mark "A"
> > s1*16
> > \tempo "Largo" 4 = 45
> >
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:21:22 -0700
"H. S. Teoh" wrote:
> global = {
> \tempo "Allegro" 4 = 120
> s1*16
> \mark "A"
> s1*16
> \tempo "Largo" 4 = 45
> s1*16
> \mark "B"
> s1*32
>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:29:41PM +0100, Mark Knoop wrote:
[...]
> However I have just submitted a potential fix for this, see here
> https://codereview.appspot.com/308910043/ for its progress.
[...]
Thanks so much for doing this!! Looking forward to when I can have
ScoreMarks show up properly in
Mark,
On Aug 12, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Mark Knoop wrote:
> However I have just submitted a potential fix for this, see here
> https://codereview.appspot.com/308910043/ for its progress.
Thank you so much for doing this!
It will be a wonderful and helpful feature, when fully/properly implemented.
B
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> There are two things about rehearsal marks in orchestral scores I'd
> like to know about.
>
> Firstly, how can I separate rehearsal marks (and other structural
> stuff like \break or \pageBreak) from the actual m
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
