Re: MusicXML and Lilypond, any news?

Hello Omer, This has become a sort of FAQ. Lilypond does not fully support MusicXML and Frescobaldi's support is also experimental. That's due to limited resources of the development team, and because implementing a spectacularly good MusicXML export does not actually benefit the core functio

Re: MusicXML and Lilypond, any news?

Le 10/10/2022 à 18:29, Omer Katzir a écrit : Is there any news about incorporating MusicXML into Lilypond? I need to share my engravings between several people, most aren’t using Lilypond. I know there’s musicxml2ly but I need it the other way around. Thanks in advance for any tips. The lat

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Le 28 sept. 2021 à 07:53, Ivanov Dmitry a écrit :What kind of programmed scores handling are you aiming at?Standard piano score with 2 staves and 4 voices: 2 voices per staff.OK, but you mentioned reading/manipulating music with programs, or did I get it wrong?Stangely enough, op

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

What kind of programmed scores handling are you aiming at? Standard piano score with 2 staves and 4 voices: 2 voices per staff. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Hello Dmitry, It looks like you’re struggling with the tools instead of going ahead using them. What kind of programmed scores handling are you aiming at? There are various ways, such as python-ly (https://pypi.org/project/python-ly/), ABC notation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_notation)

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Am Mo., 27. Sept. 2021 um 17:05 Uhr schrieb Ivanov Dmitry : > > Something is not right. I installed lilypond 2.23.3 and processed > hello2.xml. I still have an incorrect result. > > Here is what I do and what I get: > > $ musicxml2ly ./hello2.xml > musicxml2ly: Reading MusicXML from ./hello2.xml ..

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Something is not right. I installed lilypond 2.23.3 and processed hello2.xml. I still have an incorrect result. Here is what I do and what I get: $ musicxml2ly ./hello2.xml musicxml2ly: Reading MusicXML from ./hello2.xml ... musicxml2ly: Converting to LilyPond expressions... musicxml2ly: warni

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Hello Dmitry, xml2ly and MuseScore handle hello2.xml alright : the problem you have can be reproduced here with musicxml2ly (2.23.0-1) here. JM > Le 27 sept. 2021 à 10:46, Ivanov Dmitry a écrit : > > I can't reproduce your results. I tried to put your XML into hello2.xml and > compile it. Bu

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

I can't reproduce your results. I tried to put your XML into hello2.xml and compile it. But it produced pdf with the same error, Your lilypond file is compiling correctly for me. Can you try my xml? Is anything wrong with it? My lilypond version is 2.22.1. http://www.musicxml.org/dtds/partwise.dtd

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

I'm not the person of whom the question was asked, but I have myself just been asked about MusicXML export. I am retired, with time on my hands, and have for some time used LilyPond to prepare music editions for the choir I sing in - so I am fluent with it for "straightforward" choral music wit

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Am Sa., 25. Sept. 2021 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra : > > Hi Harm, > > Le 24/09/2021 à 22:52, Thomas Morley a écrit : > > I was tempted to offer a very high bounty to get a working xml-export. > > Alas, we already have > > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/665 and the there > >

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Hi Harm, Le 24/09/2021 à 22:52, Thomas Morley a écrit : I was tempted to offer a very high bounty to get a working xml-export. Alas, we already have https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/665 and the there offered bounties are not that low ... Out of curiosity, what would be your own us

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Jacques Menu: Dmitry, how do you generate MusicXML data? I do it manually. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

On 9/24/21, 3:52 PM, "Lukas-Fabian Moser" wrote: > I was tempted to offer a very high bounty to get a working xml-export. > Alas, we already have > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/665 and the there > offered bounties are not that low ... One thing I

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

I was tempted to offer a very high bounty to get a working xml-export. Alas, we already have https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/665 and the there offered bounties are not that low ... One thing I noted while skimming through that issue and the linked conversations: There were stat

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

On 9/24/21, 2:52 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote: Am Fr., 24. Sept. 2021 um 22:33 Uhr schrieb Carl Sorensen : > > We have automatic tests for xml2ly that check compliance with the musicXML standard. > > I'm fairly certain it's a problem with your musicXML, rather than xml2ly.

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

Am Fr., 24. Sept. 2021 um 22:33 Uhr schrieb Carl Sorensen : > > We have automatic tests for xml2ly that check compliance with the musicXML > standard. > > I'm fairly certain it's a problem with your musicXML, rather than xml2ly. > > Unfortunately, I'm not expert enough on musicXML to find the mist

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

On 9/24/21, 2:37 PM, "Ivanov Dmitry" wrote: On 21-09-24 20:33:05, Carl Sorensen wrote: >Why are your writing your own musicXML and then using xml2ly, instead of just writing in lilypond? I am writing software for harmonization and XML is a better language for computers to

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

On 21-09-24 20:33:05, Carl Sorensen wrote: Why are your writing your own musicXML and then using xml2ly, instead of just writing in lilypond? I am writing software for harmonization and XML is a better language for computers to read then lilypond. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano

We have automatic tests for xml2ly that check compliance with the musicXML standard. I'm fairly certain it's a problem with your musicXML, rather than xml2ly. Unfortunately, I'm not expert enough on musicXML to find the mistakes. Why are your writing your own musicXML and then using xml2ly, ins

Re: musicXML: 2 voices in 1 measurement

Hello Ivanov, You probably miss a élément, will post an example tonight. Thanks, I fixed the code myself already. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: musicXML: 2 voices in 1 measurement

Hello Ivanov, You probably miss a élément, will post an example tonight. JM Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 22 sept. 2021 à 23:04, Ivanov Dmitry a écrit : > > I am trying to create a musicXML file with 2 voices: > > > "-//Recordare//DTD MusicXML 4.0 Partwise//EN" >"http://www.musicxml.o

Re: musicXML: 2 voices in 1 measurement

>>> On 22 Sep 2021, at 23:05, Ivanov Dmitry wrote: >>> >> I am trying to create a musicXML file with 2 voices: >> >> >> >"-//Recordare//DTD MusicXML 4.0 Partwise//EN" >>"http://www.musicxml.org/dtds/partwise.dtd";> >> >> >> >> Music >> >> >> >> >> >>

Re: .musicxml suffix

Hello Timothy and Graeme, Thanks for the information! JM > Le 27 avr. 2019 à 21:22, Timothy Lanfear a écrit : > > On 27/04/2019 05:39, Jacques Menu wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> Who decided to switch from .xml to .musicxml, and what was the supposed gain >> in the move? I now find that some t

Re: .musicxml suffix

On 27/04/2019 05:39, Jacques Menu wrote: Hello folks, Who decided to switch from .xml to .musicxml, and what was the supposed gain in the move? I now find that some text editors don’t propose such files in their file open dialog.. The change is recorded on the MusicXML GitHub page https://g

Re: .musicxml suffix

Found this in the Wiki on MusicXML https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/30/music_as_mark_up/ . News to me, tho maybe not to anyone else. For convenience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML . Rgds, G. -Original Message- From: Jacques Menu Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 12:39 A

Re: MusicXML

ah yes ofcourse, I forgot to mention that. Am 29.05.2018 um 14:53 schrieb Karlin High: On 5/29/2018 7:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Varun Soontornniyomkij writes: Is it possible, using Lilypond, to save/export a score as a MusicXML file? Not at the current point of time. No MusicXML export

Re: MusicXML

On 5/29/2018 7:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote: Varun Soontornniyomkij writes: Is it possible, using Lilypond, to save/export a score as a MusicXML file? Not at the current point of time. No MusicXML export from LilyPond itself. But there are supporting programs for LilyPond that may or may no

Re: MusicXML

Hello Varun, currently this is not natively supported. I have been working on some code that is able to write some XML for simple scores and I am going to extend that: https://github.com/jpvoigt/lilypond-export/ To try it you have to prepare/install open-lilylib: https://github.com/openlilylib

Re: MusicXML

Varun Soontornniyomkij writes: > Is it possible, using Lilypond, to save/export a score as a MusicXML > file? Not at the current point of time. -- David Kastrup ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi

Re: musicxml export

Am 10. April 2016 16:32:33 MESZ, schrieb Martin Tarenskeen : > > >On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, mj wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Anyway, thanks for the helping to find the option in frescobali. > >P.S. Frescobaldi uses the python-ly library. It's part of the >Frescobaldi >installer (I guess). > >There is also

Re: musicxml export

On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, mj wrote: Hi all, Anyway, thanks for the helping to find the option in frescobali. P.S. Frescobaldi uses the python-ly library. It's part of the Frescobaldi installer (I guess). There is also a standalone commandline utility called "ly" (python script) that can do th

Re: musicxml export

Am 10. April 2016 12:52:19 MESZ, schrieb mj : >Hi all, > >On 04/09/2016 11:34 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: >> Warning: It's hidden as "experimental" with a reason. Don't expect >> miracles from it. >> > >Played with it a little bit, and yes, agreed... it is still a little >bit >bumpy, yes... :-)

Re: musicxml export

Hi all, On 04/09/2016 11:34 PM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Warning: It's hidden as "experimental" with a reason. Don't expect miracles from it. Played with it a little bit, and yes, agreed... it is still a little bit bumpy, yes... :-) Leaving out \chordmode improves the musicxml output quite

Re: musicxml export

Thanks for the quick responses! MJ On 04/09/2016 11:27 PM, Urs Liska wrote: Am 09.04.2016 um 23:03 schrieb mj: Hi, I noticed that there is musicxml2ly, but is there also some ly2musicxml functionality? I use frescobaldi, but also there (version 2.18.2) the function is not present. Does li

Re: musicxml export

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016, mj wrote: Hi, I noticed that there is musicxml2ly, but is there also some ly2musicxml functionality? I use frescobaldi, but also there (version 2.18.2) the function is not present. The function is present, but hidden because it is still an experimental feature. In

Re: musicxml export

Am 09.04.2016 um 23:03 schrieb mj: > Hi, > > I noticed that there is musicxml2ly, but is there also some > ly2musicxml functionality? > > I use frescobaldi, but also there (version 2.18.2) the function is not > present. > > Does lilypond only IMPORT musicxml? In Frescobaldi you have to enable "E

Re: MusicXML project platform

Hey all, in case you hadn't noticed: last year at the Waltrop meeting Julien Lerouge started to work on a LilyPond to MusicXML converter using LilyPond-engravers (based on Jan Nieuwenhuizen's to-xml.scm script and some of John Mandereau's ideas (see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-d

Re: MusicXML project platform

On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Curt wrote: > My own sense after reviewing the discussions I've been able to find: > > I suspect that focusing on music-stream export first is too "half-a-loaf" and > would require major rework once we add positioning. And, that re-parsing the > input file for pos

Re: MusicXML project platform

Am Freitag, den 26.04.2013, 13:31 -0700 schrieb Curt: > It seems to me that the problem (of exporting lilypond to music-xml) > is semi-stalled in the stage of identifying dependencies. Yes. And in the situation that those who are the knowledge and insight to move this on don't have the capacity t

Re: MusicXML project platform

It seems to me that the problem (of exporting lilypond to music-xml) is semi-stalled in the stage of identifying dependencies. I'm an enterprise java programmer and we often use dependency graphs to identify task relationships and next steps. I don't know C or Scheme but I'm tempted to try an

Re: MusicXML project platform

Am 26.04.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris: On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Urs Liska wrote: in order not to let this discussion go asleep again, I set up a GitHub project Hi Urs, Good idea. I added the following which I dug up. As well as the link to SXML support in Guile 2.0. -Paul Thanks.

Re: MusicXML project platform

On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > in order not to let this discussion go asleep again, I set up a GitHub project Hi Urs, Good idea. I added the following which I dug up. As well as the link to SXML support in Guile 2.0. -Paul ___ This

Re: MusicXML

> Doing it in scheme does seem to offer some nice advantages. I looked into it > and > found that there's SXML, a scheme version of XML: for info [in guile 2]: http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/SXML.html#SXML what is the priority of lilypond being built upon guile-2, i

Re: MusicXML follow-up

Urs Liska wrote: > But then I have to say: "I'm sorry, but this applies only if you happen > to have a publisher who accepts printable pdfs. If the publisher insists > on finishing the score himself (and does so only with commercial products) You may have a choice: Finale or Sibelius. > you're ou

Re: MusicXML

Paul Morris writes: > Is the music stream what you see when you use \displayMusic as > described here? No. That's even before scorifying music (scorification caters for things like repeat chords, << ... \\ ... >> and a few other things). -- David Kastrup

Re: MusicXML

Am Donnerstag, den 25.04.2013, 03:14 -0400 schrieb Paul Morris: > On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:52 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > > > Python is a great tool for XML creation. There is also > > http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/xml.html. The advantage of doing it in Scheme > > is that you are building it

Re: MusicXML

On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:52 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > Python is a great tool for XML creation. There is also > http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/xml.html. The advantage of doing it in Scheme is > that you are building it directly into LilyPond. Doing it in scheme does seem to offer some nic

Re: MusicXML

On 23 avr. 2013, at 22:32, Urs Liska wrote: > I think that a Python program might be a good idea: > - I'm sure there is good XML support with Python (don't really know, > though) You're right - it is good. > - We could surely use code or experience from the musicxml2ly project. It'd be mostly

Re: MusicXML

On 24 April 2013 05:32, Urs Liska wrote: > As David (and Mike) pointed out not everything is included in the music > stream, so a XSLT conversion won't be completely sufficient (although > probably a good start and way better than the status quo). > > Maybe there would be a way using a (Python?) a

Re: MusicXML

Am 23.04.2013 21:32, schrieb Urs Liska: > Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: > Hm, this seems not to be the first time my phone censors my reply > text :-( Thunderbird didn't display it for me either, but in the source code of your previous mail, the following passage was

Re: MusicXML

Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 21:43 +0300 schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org: > On 23 avr. 2013, at 21:21, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > > > I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert. > > > > I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of > > benefit to LilyPond to have

Re: MusicXML

Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska: Hm, this seems not to be the first time my phone censors my reply text :-( What I had written is somewhat like: > "Christopher R. Maden" schrieb: > I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert. > >

Re: MusicXML

On Apr 23, 2013, at 2:21 PM, "Christopher R. Maden" wrote: > Can someone please summarize (or point me to a summary of) the current > state of MusicXML support, what needs to be done, and the > infrastructure? E.g., is a standalone XSLT conversion acceptable, or > should MusicXML import/export b

Re: MusicXML

"Christopher R. Maden" schrieb: >I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert. > >I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of >benefit to LilyPond to have better support for MusicXML (though I don’t >use it myself). > >Can someone please summarize (or point me

Re: MusicXML

On 23 avr. 2013, at 21:21, Christopher R. Maden wrote: > I am comfortable with LilyPond, but not quite an expert. > > I am an expert in XML and XSLT, and it sounds like it would be of > benefit to LilyPond to have better support for MusicXML (though I don’t > use it myself). > > Can someone ple

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

As an engraver AND an independent publisher (both of printed, and soon digital interactive sheet music) it has been imperitive for my to find ways of efficiently separting the content from the actual publishing layout, so that changes to format and/or content can be easily managed without one be

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Scribit Kieren MacMillan dies 24/08/2011 hora 20:00: > > 1) XML that captures only the music […] > No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT. To stay in mathematical lingo, I'd say the issue is that, although it is indeed trivial to obtain #1 from #2, the problem of getting #2 in the f

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Do., 25. Aug. 2011 09:11:49 CEST, Mike Solomon wrote: > The issue with Finale and Sibelius exporting is user overrides.  I can > drag a markup over the last note in my score to be in the position of > the title and it'll look just fine in Finale, but LilyPond will have no > clue what to do wit

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > I don't think it's that easy, in particular if you want to get output > that you can send to a publisher without being thrown out of the > office... I don't think this is a goal that anyone finds worthwile to work on or pay for. Consider the facts that --triggered by

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Michael Ellis writes: > That sounds encouraging.  So how far away are we from being able to > handle a more realistic score, say a string quartet or a 4-part choral > score with with lyrics and piano reduction?  Quite far. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Aug 25, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > 2. Finale's and Sibelius' MusicXML import isn't 100% perfect either. Yes, > when Finale exports a MusicXML file and then imports the same MusicXML file > the result will be quite good. But I would not be surprised if importing > MusicXML

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: But even with shortcomings, MusicXML would make it easier to convert/import Lilypond created scores to other programs. Post-editing may still be needed, but will much less work than when using MIDI export/import. I meant: will BE much less work

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Interesting discussion. And, being primarily a user and not (really) a developer, I hardly can wait to see where this will lead to. But I will be patient. The way I see it: The ideal case would be if a lilypond score that is converted to musicXML and then imported to some other music scoring

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

David, >> No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT. > You are using "trivial" like a mathematician, strictly interchangeable with > "doable". Actually, I was using "trivial" in two ways: 1. As a mathematician (yes, I've had several papers published in peer-reviewed journals), I was

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On 8/24/11 6:00 PM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > My question is this: In what format is the final, typeset music stream such > that extracting the music information only would be massively easier than > extracting the music and layout information? > I don't believe there *is* a

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Urs: > I think 1) should be done in a manner that can be further developped to a > solution of 2). Yes — exactly. Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Hi Carl, > Do you want > > 1) XML that captures only the music (and could be imported into some other > program which will make the layout decisions)? No: this is trivial to obtain from #2 or #3, via XSLT. > 2) XML that captures both the music and the layout (and could therefore be > printed by

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Am 25.08.2011 01:48, schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 8/24/11 5:31 PM, "Michael Ellis" wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi all, In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML) expor

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On 8/24/11 5:31 PM, "Michael Ellis" wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan > wrote: >> Hi all, >> In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML) export similar to MIDI gene

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi all, > > > In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so > > that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML) > export > > similar to MIDI generation, namely via tran

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Hi all, > In short, the only way to make it extendable for the future (so > that one day we can also export the layout) is to handle (MusicXML) export > similar to MIDI generation, namely via translators that collect all events > and > all settings as they appear in the score. +1. KMac. _

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Am Wednesday, 24. August 2011, 23:33:02 schrieb Michael Ellis: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > It's only about an hour of work (see below) to convert a simple and > > prepared .ly score to musicxml, see below. > > That sounds encouraging. So how far away are we fr

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Pierre THIERRY writes: > > [cc lilypond-devel] > > > If memory serves, so far we have US$200, C$100 and €200. If I were to > > work alone on this bounty, that would allow me to allocate > > approximately 20hrs, which should clearly be en

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Pierre THIERRY writes: [cc lilypond-devel] > If memory serves, so far we have US$200, C$100 and €200. If I were to > work alone on this bounty, that would allow me to allocate > approximately 20hrs, which should clearly be enough to write a nice > XML exporting in some schema mimicking Lilypond's

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Scribit Christ van Willegen dies 24/08/2011 hora 06:23: > > I offered a $100 bounty a couple of years ago on this idea and it > still stands. Count me in for €200. Me, too, would like to see > Lilypond's usage expanded! If memory serves, so far we have US$200, C$100 and €200. If I were to work al

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Il giorno mer, 24/08/2011 alle 06.23 +0200, Christ van Willegen ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:26, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Michael Ellis > > wrote: > >> Count me in for US$100 toward the project. Not sure how much programming > > > > I offered a $100 b

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:26, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Michael Ellis > wrote: >> Count me in for US$100 toward the project.  Not sure how much programming > > I offered a $100 bounty a couple of years ago on this idea and it still > stands. Count me in for €200.

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Michael Ellis wrote: > Count me in for US$100 toward the project.  Not sure how much programming I offered a $100 bounty a couple of years ago on this idea and it still stands. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-us

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Count me in for US$100 toward the project. Not sure how much programming time I can offer in addition, but I'll certainly be more than willing to test the XML output with Finale 2010 as I have a full copy. FWIW, If this is done well I think it will open LilyPond to more new users than you would

Re: MusicXML exporter (was Re: Lilypond lobbying?)

Hi Pierre, > What kind of funding would be possible I offer C$100 to the MusicXML project. If [Jan: hint hint!] my C$100 goes to creating a function (e.g., \displayLilystreamXML) which simply converts the raw Lilypond music stream (i.e., what we see with \displayMusic) as an XML blob, I'm happ

Re: MusicXML to Lilypond

Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 schreef Rafal: > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to convert MusicXML to Lilypond format under Windows? Yes, see the manual: Application Usage->Converting from other formats. best regards, Wilbert Berendsen -- Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.

Re: MusicXml and Lilypond 2.12.2

Thank you for answers. He gave everything right. As there before I knew the lilypond these silly questions. 2009/4/17 Jonathan Kulp > Joana wrote: > >> has no way to direct (musicxml to CMN)? where do I download musicxml2ly? >> >> >> > It's included in your Lilypond installation. It's invoked

Re: MusicXml and Lilypond 2.12.2

Joana wrote: has no way to direct (musicxml to CMN)? where do I download musicxml2ly? It's included in your Lilypond installation. It's invoked differently depending on which operating system you run. On Linux it's like this: musicxml2ly filename.xml > filename.ly Jon -- Jonathan Ku

Re: MusicXml and Lilypond 2.12.2

has no way to direct (musicxml to CMN)? where do I download musicxml2ly? 2009/4/16 Nick Payne > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/Invoking-m > usicxml2ly#Invoking-musicxml2ly

RE: MusicXml and Lilypond 2.12.2

If you’ve run the Lilypond install program then it’s already installed... It will only convert from musicxml, not to musicxml. Nick From: Joana [mailto:joana...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 16 April 2009 23:15 To: Nick Payne Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Subject: Re: MusicXml and Lilypond

RE: MusicXml and Lilypond 2.12.2

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-program/Invoking-m usicxml2ly#Invoking-musicxml2ly > -Original Message- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On > Behalf Of Joana > Se

Re: MusicXML Export

Hi John, On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:14 PM, John Hopkins wrote: > We are looking at possibly using Lilypond, > especially for its nice music typesetting > and Unicode text support. However, we > would absolutely need it to not only import > XML but export it as well. The reason for > this is that we

Re: MusicXML conversion

I was looking up cadenza and the second video on this page made it all clear.  You should all see it. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: MusicXML conversion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Simon, While musicxml2ly does a good job with simple files, your file contains several features, which are not (yet?) properly handled, thus the output degrades as musicxml2ly traverses through the file. Below is a detailled list of issues I fou

Re: MusicXML conversion

The cadenza section, by the way, is really one measure with an invisible time signature change. The right hand 16th notes have been rebeamed, and the space in the left hand are simply some hidden rests. What really alarms me is the left hand at measure 87 of the first movement -- there's supp

Re: MusicXML conversion

At first I was pleasantly surprised because I think the opening pages look better in Lily, and the total uses 8 iso. 13 pages, but it appears musicxml2ly does not handle the cadenza section. Reinhold? On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Simon Bielman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I converted a Finale

Re: MusicXML conversion

Thanks Simon! Valentin wrote a bit about this in his Lilypond Report a while back after I wrote a similarly enthusiastic post to the list about how well the conversion worked: http://valentin.villenave.info/The-LilyPond-Report-12 Best, Jonathan Simon Bielman wrote: Okay, here's the .ly fil

Re: MusicXML conversion

Okay, here's the .ly file: http://www.simonbielman.com/other/sonata_no_2.ly Hope this helps! -- Simon Patrick McCarty wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:52:50AM -0700, Simon Bielman wrote: Hi all, I converted a Finale 2007 document to MusicXML, ran 'musicxml2ly', and ran it through LilyP

Re: MusicXML conversion

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:52:50AM -0700, Simon Bielman wrote: > Hi all, > > I converted a Finale 2007 document to MusicXML, ran 'musicxml2ly', and > ran it through LilyPond. Here are the results, along with the > Finale-imported .XML file and the .XML file itself: > > http://www.simonbielman.

Re: MusicXML converter: "ImportError: No module named musicxml"

Gerhard G. Tooorges wrote: Hello! I am new to Lilypond. At the moment, I do all of my work — I am a music teacher and arranger — in Sibelius 4. I used to look on the Lilpond homepage form time to time, because I somehow like the project. The engraving gets better and better, thus the "tweaks"

Re: MusicXML import: looking for co-sponsors

On 12/5/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mark Van den Borre wrote:> Hi all,>> Who would like to co-sponsor a MusicXML to Lilypond conversion script?>> What: A script that extracts notes and rests from a MusicXML file into a > Lilypond file. Written in Python, modular, extensible.> Pr

Re: MusicXML import: looking for co-sponsors

Mark Van den Borre wrote: Hi all, Who would like to co-sponsor a MusicXML to Lilypond conversion script? What: A script that extracts notes and rests from a MusicXML file into a Lilypond file. Written in Python, modular, extensible. Price: I've had a €350 price quote from Han-Wen. Hi, the st

Re: MusicXML import: looking for co-sponsors

like Han-Wen, if he or she can't meet the new requested features. I hope I'm making sense. Eduardo - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eduardo Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; "Bert Van Vreckem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday,

Re: MusicXML import: looking for co-sponsors

IL PROTECTED]> To: "Eduardo Vieira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ; "Bert Van Vreckem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:16 AM Subject: Re: MusicXML import: looking for co-sponsors > Let me suggest the following: > > as it appears that thi

  1   2   >