Mensurstriche is a way to include (or a substitute for) "bar lines"
for sources that didn't contain them, but without splitting the notes
and/or rests that are "syncopated" over the bar lines the editor wants.
By the way, is "mensurstriche" the established English term? I have no
idea, bu
Karl Hammar wrote
Trevor Daniels wrote
Karl Hammar wrote
> Till:
>> 8.5 Transcription of ancient music
>
> Why not call it "Editing" or "Making an edition", but transcription is
> also fine.
I think we'll stick with "Transcription" - it seems closer to the action
being performed by those workin
> Karl Hammar wrote
> > Till:
> >> 8.5 Transcription of ancient music
> >
> > Why not call it "Editing" or "Making an edition", but transcription is
> > also fine.
>
> I think we'll stick with "Transcription" - it seems closer to the action
> being performed by those working with ancient music,
Karl Hammar wrote
Till:
8.5 Transcription of ancient music
Why not call it "Editing" or "Making an edition", but transcription is
also fine.
I think we'll stick with "Transcription" - it seems closer to the action
being performed by those working with ancient music, who usually
want to pres
Karl Hammar wrote:
Trevor:
Would "Ancient and modern from one source" cover it. I can't think of
anything shorter.
Anyone else any better suggestions?
Why not "Best practices" or the like.
I was trying to capture the essence of the subject matter, which
is printing both ancient and mode
Trevor:
> Would "Ancient and modern from one source" cover it. I can't think of
> anything shorter.
>
> Anyone else any better suggestions?
Why not "Best practices" or the like.
Regards,
/Karl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sorry for coming in late in the game.
Till:
> 8.5 Transcription of ancient music
Why not call it "Editing" or "Making an edition", but transcription is
also fine.
> 5.1 using the same source for the original and the transcription [Here
> among others the snippets about reducing note length]
TECTED]>
To: "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: GDP: Reorganisation of NR 2 - Final call for comments
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Till Rettig wrote
Hi, this would be my suggestion for the ancient section:
8.5 Transcription
TECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: GDP: Reorganisation of NR 2 - Final call for comments
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Till Rettig wrote
Hi, this would be my suggestion for the ancient section:
8.5 Transcription of ancient music
5.1 using the same source for the or
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Till Rettig wrote
Hi, this would be my suggestion for the ancient section:
8.5 Transcription of ancient music
5.1 using the same source for the original and the transcription [Here
among others the snippets about reducing note length]
5.2 Incipits and Mensurstriche-
Till Rettig wrote
Hi, this would be my suggestion for the ancient section:
8.5 Transcription of ancient music
5.1 using the same source for the original and the transcription [Here
among others the snippets about reducing note length]
5.2 Incipits and Mensurstriche-layout
5.3 Transcription o
ilypond-user@gnu.org
> Betreff: Re: GDP: Reorganisation of NR 2 - Final call for comments
>
>
>
> Till Rettig wrote:
> > I like this new layout of the second chapter! I hope, though, you can
> > still
> > consider my suggestions...
>
> :) Of course ...
>
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:31:13 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Draft 7 (attached) I've placed a Common notation subsection
Thanks, uploaded.
> Seems to work quite well, but we've
> now lost all mention of bowed instruments as there is nothing
> left to say about them.
*shru
Graham Percival wrote:
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've added these headings. In some cases it seemed more
appropriate to add the Refs heading at the subsection level,
others at the subsubsection level. See Draft 6.
I would rather have them all at the subsubsection level; it'
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:54:44 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote
> > "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> We need a good (unique) heading. How about
> >>
> >> 2.3.1.1 References for bowed strings
> >
> > Let's do that; it's the shortest one.
Graham Percival wrote
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need a good (unique) heading. How about
2.3.1.1 References for bowed strings
Let's do that; it's the shortest one. The other NR 2 sections
will need similar headings.
I've added these headings. In some cases it seemed
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:56:34 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need a good (unique) heading. How about
>
> 2.3.1.1 References for bowed strings
Let's do that; it's the shortest one. The other NR 2 sections
will need similar headings.
I suggest that we push the deadline bac
Graham Percival wrote:> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:44:54 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
I was thinking of an expanded "seealso" section.
Kind-of like NR 1.2.1.1, but without the Duration information --
ie only the "for proportional notation, see blah. For
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:44:54 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > Where do all the "for fingerings, see @ref{fingers}" comments go?
>
> Do we need entries in Specialist notation for fingering? This seems
> too ubiquitous to be called "specialist", unless
Till Rettig wrote:
I like this new layout of the second chapter! I hope, though, you can
still
consider my suggestions...
:) Of course ...
I could think of a section on how to center lyrics between staves -- I
would
remember this was recently more than once topic on -user. Or would this g
Hi,
I like this new layout of the second chapter! I hope, though, you can still
consider my suggestions...
I could think of a section on how to center lyrics between staves -- I would
remember this was recently more than once topic on -user. Or would this go
to "hymn"? I didn't check the templat
Tomas Valusek wrote:
where will be cross-voice ties/slurs documented? They are quite common in
advanced keyboard/guitar music. Braille notation has special markings for
such situations.
I guess they could be required in music for any instrument that supports
polyphony, so my feeling is that t
Hello,
where will be cross-voice ties/slurs documented? They are quite common
in advanced keyboard/guitar music. Braille notation has special markings
for such situations.
Tomas Valusek
Trevor Daniels napsal(a):
Grand Documentation Project
The latest draft of the proposed section headings
John Mandereau wrote
Le dimanche 06 avril 2008 à 10:09 +0100, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> ... but I prefer to introduce a Common notation section
> under Wind instruments as we do for Keyboards and several other
> sections and place anything about half-holes there.
Basic vocals
Common notation f
Graham Percival wrote:
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The latest draft of the proposed section headings for the
reorganisation of NR 2 is now posted on
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt , labelled Draft 5.
Where do all the "for fingerings, see @ref{fingers}" comments go?
Le dimanche 06 avril 2008 à 10:09 +0100, Trevor Daniels a écrit :
> > ... but I prefer to introduce a Common notation section
> > under Wind instruments as we do for Keyboards and several other
> > sections and place anything about half-holes there.
>
> This isn't possible, as Graham has pointed o
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Grand Documentation Project
... but I prefer to introduce a Common notation section
under Wind instruments as we do for Keyboards and several other
sections and place anything about half-holes there.
This isn't possible, as Graham has pointed out :(
If you create new
John Mandereau wrote
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Grand Documentation Project
The latest draft of the proposed section headings for the reorganisation
of
NR 2 is now posted on http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt ,
labelled
Draft 5.
*** This is the final call for comments on this proposed re
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Grand Documentation Project
>
> The latest draft of the proposed section headings for the reorganisation of
> NR 2 is now posted on http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt , labelled
> Draft 5.
>
> *** This is the final call for comments on this proposed reorganisatio
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 23:52:25 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest draft of the proposed section headings for the
> reorganisation of NR 2 is now posted on
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/NR2-draft.txt , labelled Draft 5.
Where do all the "for fingerings, see @ref{fingers}"
30 matches
Mail list logo
