Graham Percival wrote:> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:44:54 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
I was thinking of an expanded "seealso" section.
Kind-of like NR 1.2.1.1, but without the Duration information --
ie only the "for proportional notation, see blah. For ancient
music durations, see blah."
However, I'll grant that it would be nice to see something like
2.3
2.3.1 Bowed instruments
2.3.1.1 Material covered elsewhere for strings
Slurs are indicated with @ref{slurs}. Bowings are indicated with
@ref{articulations}.
Fingerings are indicated with @ref{fingerings}.
Artificial harmonics are created with @ref{special noteheads}
@seealso
Notation Referenece: @ref{the-above-stuff}
Snippets: @lsrdir{Unfretted strings}
I'm OK with this. It's pretty much as I suggested without
the headings. It's simpler and does the job. (Don't think
we need to reference Slur though, else we'll need to ref
it under every instrument.)
We need a good (unique) heading. How about
2.3.1.1 References for bowed strings
or
2.3.1.1 Useful references for bowed strings
or
2.3.1.1 References useful for bowed strings
Examples are pulled in from lsr and will be
updated automatically if commands change.
Not in the .itely directly; they'll go in "Unfretted strings"
list.
Fine
There's one tag per section. If that's what you were suggesting,
then it's already done.
Perfect! (I think - maybe banjo players will find something useful
in the guitar examples.)
- Graham
Trevor D
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
