On Tuesday 17 January 2006 03.16, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> alanvw wrote:
> > PS I would like to hear from others who use Notepad++ and a comment from
> > Han.
>
> (the name's Han-Wen, not Han).
>
> it looks interesting, since it can be compiled under MinGW as well.
> However, It also looks like i
ubject: RE: lilypond-user Digest, Vol
38, Issue 17
Hi!
If you're using Windoze, you might want to use
Wordpad, instead of Notepad
as your editor. I've found on my windoze machine
that this is the easiest
editor to use -- I think it's part of their dist
alanvw wrote:
PS I would like to hear from others who use Notepad++ and a comment from
Han.
(the name's Han-Wen, not Han).
it looks interesting, since it can be compiled under MinGW as well.
However, It also looks like it might be a bit heavyweight for our
purposes. The binaries weigh in
Hi!
If you're using Windoze, you might want to use
Wordpad, instead of Notepad
as your editor. I've found on my windoze machine that
this is the easiest
editor to use -- I think it's part of their distro. I
tried installing
jEdit, but only got as far as installing java, and
haven't been
There were a few mentioned above. Someone recently pointed out that Emacs
is available for Windows, and (if you prefer) so is Vim (both are easy to
find with google).
In my former windows days, I used NoteTab:
http://www.notetab.com/
My brother, who actually makes money writing code, likes met
Paul Scott wrote:
> Besides the several editors commonly used by LilyPond people mentioned
> on this list there are several nice shareware editors which really are
> text editors like EditPad.
"Several" nice text editors for Windows? Can you name some of the others?
Thanks.
-- Tom
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Besides the several editors commonly used by LilyPond people mentioned
on this list there are several nice shareware editors which really are
text editors like EditPad.
"Several" nice text editors for Windows? Can you name some of the others
Gordon Gilbert wrote:
Hi!
If you're using Windoze, you might want to use Wordpad, instead of
Notepad as your editor. I've found on my windoze machine that this is
the easiest editor to use -- I think it's part of their distro. I
tried installing jEdit, but only got as far as installing jav
Hi!
If you're using Windoze, you might want to use Wordpad, instead of Notepad
as your editor. I've found on my windoze machine that this is the easiest
editor to use -- I think it's part of their distro. I tried installing
jEdit, but only got as far as installing java, and haven't been able
-Original Message-
From: ... On Behalf Of Han-Wen Nienhuys
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 18:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Linda Seltzer; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17
Erik Sandberg wrote:
> Lilypond doesn't ship with an editor on the
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> it actually does. It's called lilypad. It's comparable to notepad,
> functionality-wise.
The idea was to extend it with a Run button or menu, but I ran out of
time when doing the first native windows port. Now we have the
nicer lilypad on MacOS, and IWBN to have someth
Erik Sandberg wrote:
Lilypond doesn't ship with an editor on the Windows platform. The probably
it actually does. It's called lilypad. It's comparable to notepad,
functionality-wise.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
___
On Friday 06 January 2006 02.22, Linda Seltzer wrote:
> User Experience engineering does not require a GUI or an abandonment of the
> programming and typesetting approach. It does not require the abandonment
> of providing detailed features. What it requires is that the language
> and documentati
> My input *is* informative and is based on years of professional
> experience and expertise.
Linda, we believe you.
> I would also state that development efforts are helped tremendously
> if a specialist in user interface design evaluates development every
> step of the way. The most successfu
Hans Forbrich wrote:
> I see value in the discussion, but also a serious distraction for the
> primary developers. Is it worth taking this offline?
Graham Percival wrote:
> You want to have an offline private email discussion group? Count me
> in! :)
"Offline" ? If this means turning off my
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> That's great. Please jour the development team. We warmly welcome
^join
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_
Linda Seltzer writes:
> My input *is* informative and is based on years of professional
> experience and expertise.
That's great. Please jour the development team. We warmly welcome
anyone with a gripe who wants to spend time on fixing it. It help if
she hase lots of expertise, but time spent
Linda Seltzer wrote:
For example, if one is running on a Windows
environment, one should not have to install another editor and worry about
getting that to work, and the outputs should be easily usable and readable
by other programs without having to install other kinds of programs and
accessori
On 5-Jan-06, at 6:15 PM, Hans Forbrich wrote:
I see value in the discussion, but also a serious distraction for the
primary
developers. Is it worth taking this offline?
...
You want to have an offline private email discussion group? Count me
in! :)
Cheers,
- Graham
On 5-Jan-06, at 5:22 PM, Linda Seltzer wrote:
For example, if one is running on a Windows
environment, one should not have to install another editor and worry
about
getting that to work, and the outputs should be easily usable and
readable
by other programs without having to install other ki
I see value in the discussion, but also a serious distraction for the primary
developers. Is it worth taking this offline?
It's easy enough to create a private discussion group (invitation only, no
spam scrapers - we hope).
Let me know (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Proud user of Lilypon
Linda Seltzer wrote:
My input *is* informative and is based on years of professional experience
and expertise.
I prefer to take any input on face-value. FWIW, we have had lots
valuable feedback from people that are anything but experienced or
professional.
I would also state that developme
My input *is* informative and is based on years of professional experience
and expertise.
I would also state that development efforts are helped tremendously if a
specialist in user interface design evaluates development every step of
the way. The most successful development projects in industry
Linda Seltzer wrote:
would disagree, let alone generate a flame war. I have seen multi-million
projects go down the drain because the management didn't pay attention to
issues such as marketing or the user experience.
And of course, lily will also go this route, as the development team
never
User Experience engineering does not require a GUI or an abandonment of the
programming and typesetting approach. It does not require the abandonment
of providing detailed features. What it requires is that the language
and documentation are clear and that functionality doesn't require time-
cons
25 matches
Mail list logo
