On Tuesday 17 January 2006 03.16, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > alanvw wrote: > > PS I would like to hear from others who use Notepad++ and a comment from > > Han. > > (the name's Han-Wen, not Han). > > it looks interesting, since it can be compiled under MinGW as well. > However, It also looks like it might be a bit heavyweight for our > purposes. The binaries weigh in at 600 kb.
SciTE is about as heavyweight, and has one advantage IMHO: It is portable, so it would be possible to deliver a uniform default Lilypond experience on all platforms. (Notepad++ is based on SciTE, and I don't really know the difference apart from portability, so if anyone claims that Notepad++ is a better editor, then I will not attempt to falsify that claim) -- Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
