Dear David, Carl and Knute,
Thank you for all your replies and information. I'll work on the
file-association suggestion tomorrow and let you know if the problem is
solved.
Thanks again,
Archer
On Fri 06 Aug 2021 at 18:55:13 (+0100), Archer Endrich wrote:
>
> However, there was an earlier version in my 2.18.2 Lilypond, so I
> renamed that to disable it and added a full path to my 2.22.1
> lilypond-book in my batch file.
>
[ … ]
>
> When I run the batch files, Windows keeps asking me "H
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 10:55 AM Archer Endrich wrote:
> When I run the batch files, Windows keeps asking me "How do you want to
> open this py file?" but does not give be a Browse option. Notice the
> "access is denied" message in the command line display after running.
> (I haven't actually been
On 06/08/2021 18:32, Knute Snortum wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:35 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
You might check the following:
Is there a python.exe that is somewhere in the path ahead of Lilypond's python?
This can be checked using the Windows "where" command:
C:\> where python
--
Knute Snor
Hello Carl,
That was a good idea. When I enter 'python' on the top level of my C:\
drive, it says that the version is 3.7.4.
However, there was an earlier version in my 2.18.2 Lilypond, so I
renamed that to disable it and added a full path to my 2.22.1
lilypond-book in my batch file.
I ca
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:35 AM Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> You might check the following:
>
> Is there a python.exe that is somewhere in the path ahead of Lilypond's
> python?
This can be checked using the Windows "where" command:
C:\> where python
--
Knute Snortum
You might check the following:
Is there a python.exe that is somewhere in the path ahead of Lilypond's python?
What is your system python version?
The method you used to run lilypond-book does not include an explicit call to
the lilypond's python; IIUC you're just using the .py extension to all
Hello Aaron,
Thank you for your reply. I've checked the version of python.exe in my
Lilyond usr\bin and it's 3.7.4, so it is puzzling that it is flagging an
error about something not valid prior to 2.6. I can't think where to go
from here.
Thanks.
Archer
P.S. I hope I've replied properly t
On 2021-08-06 8:46 am, Archer Endrich wrote:
[ . . . ]
C:\P3L\lpbk>lilypond-book --output=out --pdf ALMdurasnumber.lytex
File "C:\Lilypond2221\usr\bin\lilypond-book.py", line 376
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
^
SyntaxError: invalid synt
Thank you Knute and David! I have downloaded and installed MiKTeX and
rerun my batch file (without the .py added to lilypond-book).
It appears to have called lilypond-book successfully and also pdflatex.
However, it still reports an error in lilypond-book.ly which is
preventing compilation.
On Fri 06 Aug 2021 at 12:31:06 (+0100), Archer Endrich wrote:
>
> I have been using Lilypond for a long time and am in awe of those who
> have created Lilypond and who maintain it. It is the most wonderful
> and flexible package, with super high-quality results. I have not
> written to the Users
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 6:06 AM Archer Endrich wrote:
...
>
> C:\P3L\lpbk\out>pdflatex ALMdurasnumber.tex
> 'pdflatex' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> operable program or batch file.
>
> C:\P3L\lpbk\out>cd ..\
>
> C:\P3L\lpbk>
>
> The message about pdflatex is a conundrum.
Dear Lilypond Users,
I have been using Lilypond for a long time and am in awe of those who
have created Lilypond and who maintain it. It is the most wonderful and
flexible package, with super high-quality results. I have not written to
the Users Group before, but will have certain specialised
I just tried rerunning lilypond-book after changing the temp directory
to something simpler. That has run successfully, mostly. There were no
errors thrown by either lilypond-book or pdflatex, but the snippet
widths did not fit the page properly. The contents of the commandline
follow:
Mi
Evans Winner writes:
[...] and it is the Python version 2.5.4 that came
Excuse me, I meant 2.4.5.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
I just downloaded the lilypond 2.19.4 windows binary and I'm not
seeing any change in the behavior of lilypond-book.
I don't know if this is worth anything, but I have not been
having lilypond-book hang with 2.19.3, but due to a
different problem, I tried c
The ~ is what Windows uses to create "short names" in their file structure.
For instance:
c:\docume~1\admin\locals~1\temp\tmpv3qfrb.tex
Refers to
C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Local Settings\Temp\tmpv3qfrb.tex
In this example, "Documents and Settings" has been shortened to
"docuem~1" and "Lo
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
> As suggested, I tried moving the test files into a directory with a
> simple name and got what appear to me to be identical results:
>
>> Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>> (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
>>
>> C:\Documents and Settings\Admin>cd c:
As I was closing windows I noticed a texput.log file in the temporary
directory which I hadn't seen before. It's contents:
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/W32TeX)
(format=pdflatex 2014.3.29) 8 APR 2014 19:55
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%
As suggested, I tried moving the test files into a directory with a
simple name and got what appear to me to be identical results:
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Admin>cd c:\tmp
C:\tmp>lilypond-book test2.lytex
lilypon
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
> I just downloaded the lilypond 2.19.4 windows binary and I'm not
> seeing any change in the behavior of lilypond-book.
>
> Checking the included python version, and it still appears to be
> 2.4.5. Was this supposed to be upped to 2.6?
No, this is still 2.4.5 whic
I just downloaded the lilypond 2.19.4 windows binary and I'm not seeing
any change in the behavior of lilypond-book.
Checking the included python version, and it still appears to be 2.4.5.
Was this supposed to be upped to 2.6?
Here's the contents of my command prompt after using the
Keyboar
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Graham Percival" ; "Jan Nieuwenhuizen"
; ; "Julien Rioux"
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: python 2.6 in GUB Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> I pulled Julien's branch directly from his repo in order to update my
> version of GUB to his version with Python 2.6. The LilyPond build
> failed, with the error listing below. I've got the full python.log if
> needed.
>
[...]
> Running chmod
> ('/home/gub/gub/target/f
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" ; "Phil Holmes"
; "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
; "Julien Rioux"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 2:42 AM
Subject: python 2.6 in GUB Re: Li
David, you wrote Monday, April 07, 2014 11:20 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David, you wrote Monday, April 07, 2014 10:22 AM
>>
>>> Try with the just released LilyPond 2.19.4. If that's more successful,
>>> we'll port the fix to 2.18.
>>
>> Just to confirm, lilypond-book in 2.19.4 works
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David, you wrote Monday, April 07, 2014 10:22 AM
>
>> Try with the just released LilyPond 2.19.4. If that's more successful,
>> we'll port the fix to 2.18.
>
> Just to confirm, lilypond-book in 2.19.4 works "fine" here. I.e. no change
> in the parts I use from 2.19.3 A
David, you wrote Monday, April 07, 2014 10:22 AM
> Try with the just released LilyPond 2.19.4. If that's more successful,
> we'll port the fix to 2.18.
Just to confirm, lilypond-book in 2.19.4 works "fine" here. I.e. no change
in the parts I use from 2.19.3 AFAICS.
Trevor
_
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
> Sorry if this is a double, but I hit the wrong reply button on the
> first one.
>
> On 2014-04-03 8:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> It would appear that the above code using subprocess.Popen will most
>> likely make lilypond-book hang on Windows for essentially unk
There _is_ a "lilypond" "organization" on github already, created and owned by
Janek.
We can easily fork the necessary repositories there and give all persons the
necessary push access.
As to the merge question:
As Graham sais you shouldn't merge the request.
Rather add the respective fork as a
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:44:19AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >Doesn't Julien have GUB with python 2.6 ready for testing?
>
> I should be able to test GUB with Julien's Python 2.6 later this
> week. I'd just like to check the process. I click the "Merge pull
> request" at https://github.com/gpe
Doesn't Julien have GUB with python 2.6 ready for testing? I
If I install lilypond on my Fedora 20 system using the version from the
official Fedora repo (2.18.2) it will use the Python2 version that is
shipped with Fedora (Python 2.7.5) and I never experienced problems with
that.
The
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" ; "Phil Holmes"
; "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
; "Julien Rioux"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 2:42 AM
Subject: python 2.6 in GUB Re: Li
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:53:04AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
> > David Kastrup writes:
> >
> >> So my first impulse would be to throw out the workaround for 2.4.2 that
> >
> > Let's do that.
>
> Well, issue 1933
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> So my first impulse would be to throw out the workaround for 2.4.2 that
>
> Let's do that.
Well, issue 1933
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1933> would
suggest that this is a bad idea. Nothing substantially has changed
si
David Kastrup writes:
> So my first impulse would be to throw out the workaround for 2.4.2 that
Let's do that.
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
___
l
David, you wrote Thursday, April 03, 2014 6:40 PM
> Well, you wrote:
>
>> I use lilypond-book under Windows, but only for compiling sections of
>> the documentation. It works fine for me, even 2.19.3. I don't use
>> Latex at all.
>
> Now if you use lilypond-book successfully under Windows for
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:14 PM
>
>
>> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>>
>>> 'texi2pdf' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
>>> operable program or batch file.
>>
>> That looks like a path problem.
>
> No, it's because I couldn't find a vers
Sorry if this is a double, but I hit the wrong reply button on the first
one.
On 2014-04-03 8:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
It would appear that the above code using subprocess.Popen will most
likely make lilypond-book hang on Windows for essentially unknown
reasons. Any idea what your Python ve
David Kastrup Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:14 PM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> 'texi2pdf' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
>> operable program or batch file.
>
> That looks like a path problem.
No, it's because I couldn't find a version of texi2pdf that works
under Window
David Kastrup Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:14 PM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> 'texi2pdf' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
>> operable program or batch file.
>
> That looks like a path problem.
No, it's because I couldn't find a version of texi2pdf that works
under Window
"Phil Holmes" writes:
>>> As I said many times on the notes of 1933, the line width detection
>>> was put in solely to avoid the black bars we used to get in our
>>> documentation: it had no other purpose. Given that nobody compiles
>>> the final documents on windows, the fact that it fails is o
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Trevor Daniels" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kast
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Trevor Daniels"
> Cc: "Phil Holmes" ;
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
>
>
>> "T
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Trevor Daniels"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
David wrote Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:07 PM
So
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David wrote Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:07 PM
>
>> So it would appear that we still deliver a broken version of
>> LilyPond-book in 2.18.2 since no Windows users are interested in it
>> enough that we would have gotten a report about it in the month that it
>> was availa
David wrote Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:07 PM
> So it would appear that we still deliver a broken version of
> LilyPond-book in 2.18.2 since no Windows users are interested in it
> enough that we would have gotten a report about it in the month that it
> was available in the developer releases.
I
On 03/04/2014 9:48 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
Instead of trying to find something nice
"Phil Holmes" writes:
>>> Sorry - probably busy with other stuff. This may be what you want:
>>>
>>> C:\Program Files (x86)\LilyPondV2.18.0\usr\bin>python
>>> Python 2.4.5 (#1, Oct 6 2013, 18:41:07)
>>> [GCC 4.1.1] on mingw32
>>> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more informa
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:07 PM
> Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
>>
>> I
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Br. Samuel Springuel" ;
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kas
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Br. Samuel Springuel"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:44 PM
> Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
>
>> If we had somewhat more reliable fee
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Br. Samuel Springuel"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: LilyPond-Book on Windows
If we had somewhat more reliable feedback from Windows users (this was
already released in 2.19.3, see
https://l
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
> Perhaps I wasn't clear, but I did not include a test document because
> I get the fault no matter what. I've even tested a document which was
> devoid of content and consisted of exactly 5 commands:
>
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \begin{document}
> \begin{lilypo
The list or its Gmane mirror seems sort of messed up. I think I
answered something further down in the line already.
"Br. Samuel Springuel" writes:
> I'm having trouble using lilypond-book on my Windows machine. The
> program sees to hang during the initial run of the typesetting engine
> tha
Perhaps I wasn't clear, but I did not include a test document because I
get the fault no matter what. I've even tested a document which was
devoid of content and consisted of exactly 5 commands:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\begin{lilypond}
\end{lilypond}
\end{document}
The same
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:58:52AM -0400, Br. Samuel Springuel wrote:
> I'm having trouble using lilypond-book on my Windows machine. The
> program sees to hang during the initial run of the typesetting engine
> that's used to determine the page settings. In this case, by hang I
> mean that ev
I'm having trouble using lilypond-book on my Windows machine. The
program sees to hang during the initial run of the typesetting engine
that's used to determine the page settings. In this case, by hang I
mean that everything proceeds normally up to this point, but then
nothing happens, even i
et: Freitag, 4. Januar 2013 16:12
> An: LilyPond User Group
> Cc: Per Sennels; Chris; Olivier Biot
> Betreff: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
>
> I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
> should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from bein
: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1.
Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if
interested and capable users could download it
- Original Message -
From: "Julien Rioux"
To:
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable
build (which you have actual
Julien Rioux writes:
> On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the
>> stable build (which you have actually already downloaded from my
>> website) should be on lilypond.org tomorrow.
>>
>> --
>> Phil Holmes
>>
>
> Thanks for tacklin
On 04/01/2013 4:30 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Thanks for testing this. 2.16.2 is currently uploading and the stable build
(which you have actually already downloaded from my website) should be on
lilypond.org tomorrow.
--
Phil Holmes
Thanks for tackling this, Phil, and thanks to those who ran
Hi Phil et al,
downloaded, installed and tested, with both normal lilypond and
lilypond-book, without any problems.
Thanks for fixing this problem so quickly,
Best
Per Sennels
2013/1/4 Phil Holmes
> I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
> should fix the pr
; LilyPond User Group
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-book on Windows 2.16.1
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
> should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on
> 2.16.1. Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate
> it if interested and c
On 01/04/2013 06:00 PM, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1.
Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if
interested an
I have created a new stable version of the windows binary (2.16.2) which
should fix the problem that prevents lilypond-book from being run on 2.16.1.
Before uploading this to the official website, I would appreciate it if
interested and capable users could download it from my own website:
http
69 matches
Mail list logo
