On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:44:19AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > >Doesn't Julien have GUB with python 2.6 ready for testing? > > I should be able to test GUB with Julien's Python 2.6 later this > week. I'd just like to check the process. I click the "Merge pull > request" at https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/6 and this pushes > Julien's changes into the GUB repo?
I do not recommend this -- his changes are untested, so we don't want that to become master on the (I think?) official GUB used for lilypond. (incidently, I second the calls to have a shared "lilypond" account on github. I understand David's concerns about github, and realize that moving to savannah might be better in the long term. But in the short term, going from github:gperciva to github:lilypond does not lose anything. And it's been months and months (maybe over a year?) since I left lilypond development) > I then pull the GUB repo on my GUB VM and this will get the > changes into my version of GUB? There's a way to get Julien's changes onto your local computer to test them, but I can't speak with any certainty as to how this is done. > I then make lilypond as usual. What if it doesn't work? We > then need to test the built binaries: should I put them on my > own website for people to grab and test, or do a normal upload? Please put them on your own website for people to grab and test. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
