AT file
> first.
>
> Well, and there is no warrenty for the future, it may happen that some
> versions will not cooperate with this method.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Different-versions-of-LilyPond-on-Windows7-t
oves
the old link before).
To switch between the versions, I have to execute the according BAT file
first.
Well, and there is no warrenty for the future, it may happen that some
versions will not cooperate with this method.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:44:57 -0400
Mark Mathias wrote:
> The Wikipedia article on Frescobaldi says that it will work with more
> than one version of LilyPond installed. How do I install more than
> one version under Windows7? Is there something special needed in
> Frescobaldi as well to make it c
The Wikipedia article on Frescobaldi says that it will work with more than
one version of LilyPond installed. How do I install more than one version
under Windows7? Is there something special needed in Frescobaldi as well to
make it call the version with which I'm working?
Thanks!
Mark
Op maandag 19 juli 2010 schreef Bernardo:
> I think Frescobaldi can work with different versions at the same time,
> can't it?
Frescobaldi can do this indeed (in the 1.1 series). You can configure a list
of LilyPond binaries of different versions (they don't even have to be in the
PATH, just do
I would suggest install a linux partition with fedora or ubuntu. :-) These
OS reached a very good level already and you will be pleased with them!
2010/7/19 Helge Kruse
> Am 19.07.2010 02:40, schrieb Bernardo Barros:
>
> I think Frescobaldi can work with different versions at the same time,
>>
Am 19.07.2010 02:40, schrieb Bernardo Barros:
I think Frescobaldi can work with different versions at the same time,
can't it?
Maybe it can, but not on Windows XP as James asked. It depends on KDE
modules that are unfortunately not yet ported to Windows.
Helge
__
I think Frescobaldi can work with different versions at the same time, can't
it?
2010/7/18 Helge Kruse
> Am 14.07.2010 18:13, schrieb James Lowe:
>
>
>> That sounds awfully complicated (and one would question the legality of
>> having multiple installs of the same version of XP on one machine bu
Am 14.07.2010 18:13, schrieb James Lowe:
That sounds awfully complicated (and one would question the legality of having
multiple installs of the same version of XP on one machine but I haven't read
MS's EULA)
Can't you just
1. install version 2.12.whatever
2. rename lilypond dir accordingly
Am 14.07.2010 20:02, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
James Lowe wrote Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:13 PM
Can't you just
1. install version 2.12.whatever
2. rename lilypond dir accordingly
3. install ve4rsion 2.13.whatever
4. rename lilypond dir accordingly
and just put back the old dir name for the ve
James Lowe wrote Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:13 PM
Can't you just
1. install version 2.12.whatever
2. rename lilypond dir accordingly
3. install ve4rsion 2.13.whatever
4. rename lilypond dir accordingly
and just put back the old dir name for the version
you want to use.
Yes, you can. I do
Urs Liska"
Cc: "Lilypond-User"
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:13 PM
Subject: RE: Different versions of LilyPond
That sounds awfully complicated (and one would question the legality of
having multiple installs of the same version of XP on one machine but I
haven't read MS
4/2010 17:01
To: Urs Liska
Cc: Lilypond-User
Subject: Re: Different versions of LilyPond
I'm interested in running multiple versions under Windows and I think the
easiest way would be to create virtual machines to run each version of
LilyPond. You would have to download Microsoft's Virt
f you are using an XP host, make sure you download the XP version of
Virtual PC as Microsoft has a different version of it for Windows 7.
I just got a laptop with a Core i7 processor running Windows 7 with 8 gig
RAM and a 500 gig hard drive so I'm going to see if I can use XP mode to
bring up d
On Wed 14 Jul 2010, 14:36 Urs Liska wrote:
> But I assume that instead of editing the symlink I should also be
> able to create different scripts (like "lilypond2.13.27.sh") to
> start the different versions.
Definitely --- you may combine both tricks: "lilypond" for "default version"
(which is eas
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
wrote:
> On Wed 14 Jul 2010, 11:54 Urs Liska wrote:
>> Hello list,
> Hello Urs!
>
>> I would like to have several versions of LilyPond installed at the
>> same time to be able to test lilypond code in different versions.
>> What would be the best
On Wed 14 Jul 2010, 11:54 Urs Liska wrote:
> Hello list,
Hello Urs!
> I would like to have several versions of LilyPond installed at the
> same time to be able to test lilypond code in different versions.
> What would be the best way to accomplish this on Windows XP and
> Ubuntu Linux?
> I recall
Hello list,
I would like to have several versions of LilyPond installed at the same
time to be able to test lilypond code in different versions.
What would be the best way to accomplish this on Windows XP and Ubuntu
Linux?
I recall having read something about a renaming/symlink solution on
Lin
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bostjan Kuzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: Lilypond-book and different versions of Lilypond
>
>
> B
Bostjan Kuzman wrote:
Thanks, this will come handy. However, this conversion doesn't replace
"11pt" option with "staffwidth=11".
If I keep "11pt" in the code, I get several warnings from lilypond-book
and on running latex I get this:
LaTeX error: missing \begin{document}
l.1 ^^ef
^^bf^^\docu
Bostjan Kuzman wrote:
After some tweaking I've found that in 2.1.28:
- to add line breaks between fragments, I just add 2 empty lines in
input file,
Like in any normal LaTeX document. What you saw before was a
bug in the old lilypond-book.
/Mats
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> If anyone wants to play around with the input file to suggest me some
> other improvements, here is
> http://razor.arnes.si/~bkuzma1/lily/romberg.tex .
why are you writing
\translator {
whichBar = #""
}
whichBar is unset after every note.
--
Han-Wen Ni
ge-
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:08 PM
To: Bertalan Fodor
Cc: 'Bostjan Kuzman'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lilypond-book and different versions of Lilypond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Have you seen lilypond --help?
>
> I
After some tweaking I've found that in 2.1.28:
- to add line breaks between fragments, I just add 2 empty lines in
input file,
- to avoid some latex-processing errors, all I had to do was to replace
the old "11pt" option in \begin[11pt]{lilypond} with "staffwidth=11".
This is quite weird, because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Have you seen lilypond --help?
>
> It says you can use this:
>
>lilypond-book --filter="convert-ly --no-version --from=2.0.0 -" BOOK
>
> Do you not need this?
That actually doesn't work due to some refactoring of the code. You
can simply use
convert-ly -n --
Have you seen lilypond --help?
It says you can use this:
lilypond-book --filter="convert-ly --no-version --from=2.0.0 -" BOOK
Do you not need this?
Bert
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
I'm writing something like a book of cello exercises, with a lot of
short music fragments and some text.
I find a combination of LaTeX and Lilypond-book a perfect tool for my
work, at least in theory.
However, there are some problems in practice.
Using Lilypond version 2.0.1 with Fedora Core 1
27 matches
Mail list logo
