On 17/04/2017 22:06, Thomas Morley wrote:
2017-04-17 21:08 GMT+02:00 Roman Stawski :
I'm coming across a problem with context definitions:
\version "2.19.59"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\accepts P
}
\context {
Hello all
I'm coming across a problem with context definitions:
\version "2.19.59"
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\accepts P
}
\context {
\name P
\alias Voice
}
}
\new Staff {
\new P \relative
On 05/01/2016 21:52, Noeck wrote:
Hi Roman,
I also use OOoLilyPond often and had to check immediately when I read
your mail. I am using LibreOffice 5.0.2.2 and OOoLilypond 4.0.0 and it
still works for me. What is actually happening when you insert a new
snippet?
Cheers,
Joram
Hello Joram
Whe
Hi folks
I upgraded to LibreOffice 4.3 recently and now I'm having problems in
getting OOoLilypond to actually insert a snippet although the generation
works fine. FWIW I'm using Lilypond 2.19.33.
Is anyone still using OOoLilypond? If so have they come across the problem,
and do they have a worka
On 24/04/2013 21:03, Federico Bruni wrote:
You can find an explanation here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/usage/common-errors#an-extra-staff-appears
Thanks Federico, I wasn't aware of this one. I appreciate the pointer.
the right input is:
\version "2.17.11"
\paper { ragged
Hi folks
I've just comme across this in 2.17.11
---
\version "2.17.11"
\paper { ragged-right = ##t }
{
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff \relative c'' { a1 }
\new Staff \relative c' { f1 }
>>
\break
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff \relative c'' { b1 }
\new St
Janek Warchoł gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Roman Stawski stawski.fr> wrote:
>
> Interesting. If i were you, i'd place the skips inside MainSequence
> and have the ambitus appear at the very beginning, and keep that first
> system alive
> I'm not top posting.
It seems that \RemoveEmptyStaves doesn't play very well with the
ambitus_engraver.
In this example, I'm trying to get the treble staff removed in the
first two systems, and appear with an ambitus on the third.
It is removed correctly in the first system. But reappears in
Eluze gmail.com> writes:
> Am 08.05.2012 12:00, schrieb Roman Stawski:
> >
> > Does anyone have an idea how to get an error free compile and the bar lines
> > spanning.
>
> from 2.15.27 there will be no more error message for that!
Thank you Eluze. I wasn't
Hello people
I've come across a problem in 2.15.24 which I don't /believe/ existed in earlier
2.15 versions (although I haven't checked and I couldn't say when it appeared)
---
\version "2.15.24"
\new ChoirStaff \with {
\consists Span_bar_engraver
} {
\new Staff = mai
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
>
> I just pushed a fix to staging as
> a2c7fbaa892b59a590b4635ddd184ca0487a38e3. With that fix, your example
> runs fine.
>
Thankyou Sir! And Christmas has already been and gone (well nearly). I look
forward to the next update. And thanks again for your rapid f
Francisco Vila gmail.com> writes:
>
> 2010/10/7 Roman Stawski stawski.fr>:
> > In the snippet below, I'm trying to set up a simple numbering of the pieces.
> > This used to number the pieces in ascending order in version 2.12.[don't
recall].
> > But no
In the snippet below, I'm trying to set up a simple numbering of the pieces.
This used to number the pieces in ascending order in version 2.12.[don't
recall].
But not any more...
\version "2.13.34"
#(define sequence-number 0)
#(define-markup-command (score-sequence layout props) ()
(set!
Christopher Meredith gmail.com> writes:
>
> I've searched, I swear. If there's a really simple answer, I apologize
> in advance!
>
> I'm looking for a way to simply shrink everything to make it easier to
> fit on a page. My first lines of defense are usually shrinking the
> distance between sta
Thanks folks
I suspect there may be bug somewhere in there, but your solution
suits me just fine.
Kudos for a rapid answer.
Roman
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi folks
I'm having some difficulty getting break-visibility to work with
ambitus. In the example below I set #'break-visibility to ##(#f #f #f)
which should stop the ambitus from rendering in any position. However,
I still see the ambitus at line ends, in the middle of lines and at
line beginnin
Martin Tarenskeen zonnet.nl> writes:
> Does this mean I have to use two \score sections. One for \midi and onBe
> {} for \layout {} like this? :
>
> \score { \new Staff { \transpose c' c { \guitarMusic} } \midi {} }
> \score { \new Staff { \guitarMusic } \layout {} }
>
> I was hopening for an
After some playing around, I found that the following gets rid of the
warnings. It does seem a little messy, though.
-
\version "2.13.11"
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
<<
\new Staff \new Voice = "a" \relative c'' { a b c d }
\new Dynamics \with {
\override VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-aff
Hi folks
When I build the snippet
-
\version "2.13.11"
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
<<
\new Staff \new Voice = "a" \relative c'' { a b c d }
\new Dynamics { s4\p s\< s\! s\mf }
\new Lyrics { \lyricsto "a" \lyricmode { a b c d }}
>>
-
the output is as expected, but I get a whole ca
On 25/02/2010 23:05, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
>
> On 25 February 2010 21:04, Roman Stawski wrote:
>
>> This short polyphony employs
>> A trivial customised Voice
>> but the lyrics ignore
>> the first note in the score --
>> that's not the behaviour of
This short polyphony employs
A trivial customised Voice
but the lyrics ignore
the first note in the score --
that's not the behaviour of choice.
-
\version "2.13.11"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\name MainVoice
\alias Voice
}
\context {
Michael J. O'Donnell acm.org> writes:
>
> Thanks for pointing out \tag. I've already read up, and experimented
> with it. It doesn't solve the problem, because it requires that I
> anticipate every possible correction when entering the data from the MS.
> The only way to get useful coverage is t
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
>> You can see the bit I'm trying to transcribe at
>> http://www.roman.stawski.fr/snippet.jpg
>
> That's clearly an engraving error in the original — the word is
> "tendresse", and should be engraved "ten - dres - - - se".
>
> If you REALLY want to duplicate/
James E. Bailey googlemail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> On 22.11.2009, at 10:56, Roman Stawski wrote:
>
> Question to the wise : how do you use extenders in the _middle_
> of words.
>
> …
> The 'Ly' of lyric is stretched across two notes and I want to
&g
Question to the wise : how do you use extenders in the _middle_
of words.
I know that the documentation says
"In the last syllable of a word, melismata are sometimes
indicated with a long horizontal line starting in the melisma
syllable, and ending in the next one."
I have the following exam
J. bezeqint.net> writes:
> If some one can help or point me to documentation
> in how to make 20 note incipits in Lilypond for a large folk song
> collection I am working to publish from the linux computer I have
> inherited.
> I want to take the opening phrase of each one and
> create an in
Martin Tarenskeen zonnet.nl> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Dutch Lilyponders might have noticed: Sinterklaas is here again
> For my youngest pupils I created a score of "Zie Ginds Komt De Stoomboot"
> last year. I tried to compile it again, now with lilypond development
> version 2.13.7. I don't like
J. bezeqint.net> writes:
> Hi Again evrey body, I'm happy to say that with
> because of the help you gave me I was not only able to get jedit up
> and running for lilypond but was encouraged to succede in setting up
> emacs too!
> Vim though is somthing else.
> I looked at the directions on
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:52:59PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
> >
> > > LilyPond 2.13.7 is out. This release theoretically works on osx
> > > 10.6, without breaking anything on other OSes,
> >
> >
At 13:59 22/11/2008, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
See the "Known issues and warnings" of section 5.1.4 "Changing
default context settings" in the Notation Reference.
If you really want to understand what happens, it may also help
to look at the definition of \RemoveEmptyStaffContext in the
file ly/engr
Hi everyone
It seems that if I create a new context based on the Voice context, it
won't play with \RemoveEmptyStaffContext at all. Try the snippet below
as is, and then uncomment the commented block. A warning is generated
and lyrics are no longer rendered. Any ideas on how to get this to
work?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman Stawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Take a look at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=493
Nice!
Is there a way to get rid of the "warning: no such internal option:
target"?
I asked Nicolas Sceaux the same question when he h
Johan
This is the sort of thing I was playing with earlier on this year.
Take a look at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=493
This lets you have constructs such as
\ifTargetIn #'(foo) {
...
}
In this case the symbols are switched on/off on the command-line but you
could always change
Hi James
I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for but here's a snippet
with examples ranging from the straightforward -- those that _I_ can
understand -- to the more involved (chordRootNamer).
- - - - [START]
\version "2.11.60"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
% ---
Thanks Trevor for your suggestions.
I hadn't even considered the multi-score solution because that splits
the midi to two files. And then I realised that, in this case, it
doesn't really matter since the midi and PDF definitions are quite
different.
The other solution consists of 'adapting' an ex
> Roman Stawski wrote:
>> I want to have one group of parallel staves following another
>> sequentially. The constitution of the two groups is quite different.
>> (In the real piece I'm using \removeEmptyStaffContext to hide the
>> first group when I finish
I want to have one group of parallel staves following another
sequentially. The constitution of the two groups is quite different.
(In the real piece I'm using \removeEmptyStaffContext to hide the
first group when I finish with it.) A cut-down example is:
- - - -[START]
\version "2.11.60"
\layout
> When running lilypond with the switches
>
> -dpreview -dno-print-pages
>
> is there any way to stop the page headers printing from the command
> line, so that I just get the first line of music?
OK, -dhelp lists the solution.
-dpreview -dno-print-pages -dno-include-book-title-preview
>
> Hi,
>
> I integrated a lilypond-file then processed by lilypond-book in latex
> and I got an indent as you can see in the attached pdf. The code for
> that fragment in latex looks like that:
>
> ...
> Bestandteil des genannten \textit{Perpetuum Mobile}-Kanons. \\
> Hier dann die caption \\
> \L
When running lilypond with the switches
-dpreview -dno-print-pages
is there any way to stop the page headers printing from the command
line, so that I just get the first line of music?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://
Sorry - resending message originally sent with incorrect subject
Beg pardon
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:50:09 +1200
From: "Daryna Baikadamova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: a program / command / script turing a lilypond full score
intoconductor's score and parts scores automatically
To:
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:50:09 +1200
From: "Daryna Baikadamova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: a program / command / script turing a lilypond full score
intoconductor's score and parts scores automatically
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: t
Valentin Villenave gmail.com> writes:
>
> 2008/7/16 Nicolas Sceaux free.fr>:
>
> > You can conditionnaly insert music using a music function.
>
> Awesome! Can you (or Roman) write a LSR snippet with this great function?
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
(Previous message seems to have gone AWOL)
S
Francisco Vila wrote:
Hello all,
Attached is what I want and what I get; in a single note we have:
- last letter of a previous word
- an italic apostrophe
- first letter of the next word, also italic
Not only I cannot join all of this onto a single note, I also obtain
errors for the next syll
Trevor Daniels wrote
OK, I see what you are trying to do. The error is that
the order of the commands in the lyrics line is wrong,
and the \new Lyrics command should be followed by { .. }
just like \new Staff is. Then it works fine, like this:
\new Staff { \new Voice = "dirge" { c''1 } }
\n
I think that there seems to be a problem with the way the repeats and
alternatives
are handled
In the page
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Repeat-syntax.html#Repeat%20syntax
(documentation for repeat syntax) the last example seems
strange. The second alternative
46 matches
Mail list logo
