Re: lyluatex collection for user without internet connection

Hi list, at least the windows version of texlive 2018 contains lyluatex 1.06 (installed via the net). However for windows the path provided on the program option must not include spaces - luatex or whoever parses them reliably removes any blanks. I had to copy my LP installation to a path w/o

Re: lyluatex collection for user without internet connection

Am 25.01.19 um 02:40 schrieb Karlin High: Someone who writes hymns with LilyPond has asked me about methods for compiling them into a songbook or hymnal. I responded that I like what I see of lyluatex, but it's still a research topic for me. All I know about it is notes I've gathered from the L

Re: harp basic muffle

>> This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the >> appearance closer to what you are looking for: [...] > > Perfect, thanks so much! Is the exact shape of this symbol `universal'? I.e., do German, French, and US publishers use exactly this shape? If the answer is yes the glyph s

Re: harp basic muffle

Perfect, thanks so much! Rachel > On Jan 24, 2019, at 3:49 PM, Leo Correia de Verdier > wrote: > > This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the appearance closer > to what you are looking for: > > mufflePath= > \markup > \path #'0.25 #'((moveto -1.5 0) > (lineto 1

lyluatex collection for user without internet connection

Someone who writes hymns with LilyPond has asked me about methods for compiling them into a songbook or hymnal. I responded that I like what I see of lyluatex, but it's still a research topic for me. All I know about it is notes I've gathered from the LilyPond mailing list. Soon I'd agreed to mail

Compiling lilypond in emacs etc

What is the best way to add flags and options to the lilypond compile command in the emacs lilypond mode? Also, regarding the failure to widen the buffer after the narrowing that takes place in certain cases, I see in the archives the suggestion to wrap the instances of narrow-to-region in a save-

Re: Clef moves notes why??

On 1/24/2019 4:06 PM, Reggie wrote: Need to? But what If I wish to have the clef on the right side of the barline but have the notes on the other staff be lined up as if I DID put clef to the left of the barline? Say I want, is this possible? The question isn't whether this is possible. LilyPon

Re: harp basic muffle

On 2019-01-24 2:36 pm, Rachel Knight wrote: The second muffle is very close to what I am looking for! All the lines could be thicker and the straight parts should stick just a little further past the circle. Would there be a way to include it apart from having it in a dynamic context? Often in h

Re: harp basic muffle

This is Valentins code with a few values changed to get the appearance closer to what you are looking for: mufflePath= \markup \path #'0.25 #'((moveto -1.5 0) (lineto 1.5 0) (moveto 0 -1.5) (lineto 0 1.5)) muffleMarkup= \markup \translate #'(0 . 1) \c

Re: Clef moves notes why??

Aaron Hill wrote > On 2019-01-24 1:20 pm, Reggie wrote: >> David Kastrup wrote >>> Reggie wrote: \override Staff.Clef.stencil = ##t >>> ^^ >>> what is that even supposed to be/do? >> >> David I do think it's quite obvious what I wass trying. [ . . . ] > > The

Re: Clef moves notes why??

On 2019-01-24 1:20 pm, Reggie wrote: David Kastrup wrote Reggie wrote: \override Staff.Clef.stencil = ##t ^^ what is that even supposed to be/do? David I do think it's quite obvious what I wass trying. [ . . . ] The question was directed specifically at the

Re: harp basic muffle

The second muffle is very close to what I am looking for! All the lines could be thicker and the straight parts should stick just a little further past the circle. Would there be a way to include it apart from having it in a dynamic context? Often in harp music, we need the muffle below the sta

Re: Clef moves notes why??

On 1/24/19, Reggie wrote: > Need to? But what If I wish to have the clef on the right side of the > barline but have the notes on the other staff be lined up as if I DID put > clef to the left of the barline? Well, you need to cheat: %% << \new Staff { \repeat unfold 100 { c'4 } }

Re: Clef moves notes why??

David Wright wrote > On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 13:22:53 (-0700), Reggie wrote: >> Good evening. I am attempting a worksheet of sorts and would like to hide >> a >> staff for a little while then bring it back with the clef on the right >> side >> of the barline. > > There's your mistake. You need to pu

Re: Clef moves notes why??

On Thu 24 Jan 2019 at 13:22:53 (-0700), Reggie wrote: > Good evening. I am attempting a worksheet of sorts and would like to hide a > staff for a little while then bring it back with the clef on the right side > of the barline. There's your mistake. You need to put the clef on the left of the barl

Re: Clef moves notes why??

David Kastrup wrote > Reggie < > reegistoop@ > > writes: > >> Good evening. I am attempting a worksheet of sorts and would like to hide >> a >> staff for a little while then bring it back with the clef on the right >> side >> of the barline. I have the result I want, I wish to know why it's ruin

Re: Clef moves notes why??

On 1/24/19, Reggie wrote: > I wish to know why it's ruining my > other staff? So much extra space at the beginning of the other staff see > it? > Why? Why can't the code just move the clef and leave everything else > alone?? Greetings, Reggie, I’m not sure how Lily could handle that: - the barlin

Re: Clef moves notes why??

Reggie writes: > Good evening. I am attempting a worksheet of sorts and would like to hide a > staff for a little while then bring it back with the clef on the right side > of the barline. I have the result I want, I wish to know why it's ruining my > other staff? So much extra space at the begin

Clef moves notes why??

Good evening. I am attempting a worksheet of sorts and would like to hide a staff for a little while then bring it back with the clef on the right side of the barline. I have the result I want, I wish to know why it's ruining my other staff? So much extra space at the beginning of the other staff s

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/24/19, N. Andrew Walsh wrote: > In contemporary notation, a dotted line > connects a note or chord to a later-occurring dampen symbol, indicating > that those strings *and those strings only* are dampened at that point. Is that the sort of things you’re referring to? https://musescore.org/en

Re: print bass staff not always

> > From David K. > AFAIR, \PianoStaff \remove "Keep_alive_together_engraver" is the same as > \GrandStaff . And \RemoveEmptyStaves \override > VerticalAxisGroup.remove-first = ##t is the same as > \RemoveAllEmptyStaves . > > So it's more like you want > > \score > { > \new GrandStaff << > \

Re: Function for multiple tweaks

David Kastrup writes: > Andrew Bernard writes: > >> I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the >> note inside the chord: >> >> \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print >> \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1 >> \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "n

Re: print bass staff not always

Gianmaria Lari writes: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 14:53, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Gianmaria Lari writes: >> [...] > >> To make lilypond print anyway a staff only containing rests [] >> > > >> That does not look simpler than >> >> \new Staff \with { >> keepAliveInterfaces = #'( >> rest

Re: Function for multiple tweaks

Thanks so much David and off list repliers. I'm deeply grateful for the generous help on this amazing list. Here's what works nicely: \version "2.19.82" harmonicNote = \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1 \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "no

Re: print bass staff not always

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 16:31, Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 22.01.19 09:56, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > > > I found an issue with \RemoveEmptyStaves. It also remove \Dynamics. > > Just write a layout block like this: > \layout { >\context { > \PianoStaff > \remove Keep_alive_together_eng

Re: print bass staff not always

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 14:53, David Kastrup wrote: > Gianmaria Lari writes: > [...] > To make lilypond print anyway a staff only containing rests [] > > That does not look simpler than > > \new Staff \with { > keepAliveInterfaces = #'( > rest-interface > bass-figure-interface

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/23/2019 11:53 PM, Federico Bruni wrote: Il giorno gio 24 gen 2019 alle 6:46, Andrew Bernard ha scritto: Hi Rachel, I feel sure this came up on the list a while ago. Try an archive search. I'm not q

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Andrew, I was anticipating this coming up immediately after the OP question. I was looking at Smufl and there is a whole page of specialist harp symbols. I imagine people would want all of those if they want the muffle. I don;'t know enough to say how one would gp about proving them, and perha

Re: harp basic muffle

Hi Valentin, On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:05 AM Valentin Villenave wrote: > > Greetings everybody, > I’ve just added a LSR snippet for harp muffle notation, feel free to > let me know if there’s any way I can improve it… > > http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=1085 thank you very much for posting

Re: harp basic muffle

PS- it turns out that Gould, p. 365, has a recommended notation for damping individual strings, and it's less cluttered: she uses small notes with damping symbols on their stems, and has other notation for damping a specific range. That's probably easier than a spanner.

Re: Function for multiple tweaks

Andrew Bernard writes: > I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the > note inside the chord: > > \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print > \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1 > \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "noteheads.s0mi") > > How can I mak

Function for multiple tweaks

I have many chords where a note is a harmonic. I use the following for the note inside the chord: \tweak NoteHead.stencil #ly:text-interface::print \tweak NoteHead.font-size #1 \tweak NoteHead.text #(markup #:musicglyph "noteheads.s0mi") How can I make this into what I am tempted to call a

Re: harp basic muffle

On 1/24/19, Federico Bruni wrote: > Greetings everybody, I’ve just added a LSR snippet for harp muffle notation, feel free to let me know if there’s any way I can improve it… http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id

Re: Atom editor

On 2019-01-23 11:42 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote: I'd like to try to use Atom with point and click from lilypond PDF output. What would one set LYEDITOR to to achieve this? I don't use Atom, but it looks like it accepts line and column number on the command-line. So you will probably want someth