>> . First of all, `make-XXX-stencil' seems to be completely
>> undocumented. At least I can't find those functions in the
>> reference (except some unsystematic usage here and there).
>
> I'm not sure who made them or when they made it into LilyPond, but
> you're certainly welcome to post a
Please let us know if the solution works for you.
--
Daniel E. Moctezuma
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
on 2012-09-06 at 07:41 m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>not pretty, but effective...
thanks mike and robin for your suggestions, i need to study them to
properly understand how (and why) they work.
the truth is that, for the time being, i had solved my problem with
lots of \halign, \lower, \magnify
>
> What have I got wrong?
>
> I am using Outlook and IE9 with Vista Home Premium
Well, there's a couple things right there ;-)
Sorry, I could not resist.
(WinXP Pro SP3 32-bit here...hope to "upgrade" soon)
On a more serious note, I just copy and paste the URL into my browser
(Chrome), and
2012/9/7 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2012/9/6 Janne Uusitalo :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> if I typeset a key change from b major to g major, f remains sharp and
>>> LilyPond prints out the naturals necessary for c, g, d, and a. Makes
>>> perfect sense, but the standard I'm required to follow
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
> http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
> The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to
> be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have c
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:25:14 -0700
Nathan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
> >> http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
> >> The
David Kastrup wrote:
The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to
be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have changed significantly
with 2.16...
Not sure whether to laugh or to cry after reading these "reviews".
(In the end, I decided to laugh!)
__
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Brett McCoy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
>> http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
>> The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appe
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
> http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
> The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to
> be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have ch
Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site
http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>.
The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to
be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have changed significantly
with 2.16...
--
David Kastrup
_
Hello,
2012/9/6 Werner LEMBERG
> > - -dno-point-and-click was exactly what I was looking for;
> > lilypond --help had not revealed that wisdom.
>
> Indeed, it is missing for `lilypond -dhelp'. Looks like a bug...
>
Tthis was added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2814by Co
the webpage is temporarily unavailable. Alternatively, the
website might have changed or removed the webpage.
What have I got wrong?
I am using Outlook and IE9 with Vista Home Premium
A typical failing link is
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20120907/7433053a/attach
Hi David,
> \override Score.FootnoteItem #'annotation-line = ##f
That's it. I had also tried FootnoteItem, but was missing the Score qualifier.
Thanks a lot,
Martin
--
homme, ni présence
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://li
Martin Neubauer writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In a score I'm preparing I'm using footnotes for some explanations. In
> those cases it is clear from context which notes they refer to,
> rendering the lines to the note heads they are attached to both
> unnecessary and – to my eye – visually unpleas
Hello everyone,
In a score I'm preparing I'm using footnotes for some explanations. In
those cases it is clear from context which notes they refer to,
rendering the lines to the note heads they are attached to both
unnecessary and – to my eye – visually unpleasing. The documentation
led me to try
Peter Crighton writes:
> Hi all,
>
> when having included \tabFullNotation in a TabStaff, the time
> signature is not centered vertically with an even number of lines in
> the staff. This is because a time signature is anchored at a line, not
> the space between lines. Is there any way to change
Hi all,
when having included \tabFullNotation in a TabStaff, the time
signature is not centered vertically with an even number of lines in
the staff. This is because a time signature is anchored at a line, not
the space between lines. Is there any way to change this behaviour and
have the time sig
"Peter Gentry" writes:
>>Message: 3
>>Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:53:30 +0200
>>From: David Kastrup
>>To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>>Subject: Re: Markup query
>>Message-ID: <87sjau17mt@fencepost.gnu.org>
>>Content-Type: text/plain
>>
>>"Peter Gentry" writes:
>
>>> Another puzzle arises from the
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:53:30 +0200
>From: David Kastrup
>To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: Markup query
>Message-ID: <87sjau17mt@fencepost.gnu.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>"Peter Gentry" writes:
>> Another puzzle arises from the use of user defined variables a
>>
Hi Fabio,
Works perfect for me regardless of Lilypond-version up to 2.17.1
Best regards,
Kai
... von unterwegs gesendet!
Am 07.09.2012 um 12:55 schrieb fabio gabbianelli :
> anyone knows if lilypond 2.16 or 2.17 works with osx 10.7? it could work
> through "jEdit" ?
> ___
Greetings,
You wrote:-
+
Is there a way to ignore descenders (q, g, y, etc.) in lyrics? It messes
up base lines and line spacing and makes for a very unattractive
misalignment. I think this was briefly discussed back in 2.13, bu
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Peter Gentry"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:22 AM
> Subject: RE: RE:Markup query
>
>
>> >From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
>
>>>Do you use my Noteworthy->Lilypond converter?
>>>
>> I certainly do and very
anyone knows if lilypond 2.16 or 2.17 works with osx 10.7? it could work
through "jEdit" ?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
pabuhr wrote
>
>
>
>One way to cope with that, if the OS is sufficiently unix-like, is:
>
>for f in `find . -name \*.ly -print`
>do
> echo Converting $f
> convert-ly -ed $f
>done
>
>Then any files which had problems could be identified and addressed
> individuall
>-Original Message-
>From: Davide Liessi [mailto:dal...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:44 AM
>To: Peter Gentry
>Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
>Subject: Re: RE:Markup query
>
>Hi Peter.
>
>2012/9/7 Peter Gentry :
As a small example setting various swiches true/false in
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Gentry"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: RE:Markup query
>From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
Do you use my Noteworthy->Lilypond converter?
I certainly do and very useful it is too - minor issues it does outpu
Hi Peter.
2012/9/7 Peter Gentry :
>>> As a small example setting various swiches true/false in the
>>paper block often seems to have no effect - I guess the reason is that
>>> those switches are irrelevant in the context.
>>
>>This should never be the case. Please give examples.
>>
> This is the
>From: Phil Holmes [mailto:m...@philholmes.net]
>Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10:44 AM
>> I seem to have touched a nerve somewhere.
>
>Not at all. I'm simply offering alternative ways to look for what you're
>trying to do. If you are >trying to do anything
more complex than very simple
Dear Daniel,
thanks for Your help. I will try Your script and hope, that this will save
the problem.
2012/9/7 Daniel E. Moctezuma
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I had that same error a couple of hours ago and I fixed like this on my
> bash script:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env bash
>
> TEMP_DIR=temp
> INPUT_FILE=your
"Peter Gentry" writes:
>>As others have said, it is definitely in the notation PDF.
>>
>>As an alternative to searching (which always used to be my first
>>port-of-call) may I suggest you explore using the index
>>instead or as well.
>>You may find that quicker and more accurate.
>>
>>If you h
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Gentry"
To:
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10:09 AM
Subject: RE: RE:Markup query
>As others have said, it is definitely in the notation PDF.
As an alternative to searching (which always used to be my first
port-of-call) may I suggest you explore
>As others have said, it is definitely in the notation PDF.
>
>As an alternative to searching (which always used to be my first
>port-of-call) may I suggest you explore using the index
>instead or as well.
>You may find that quicker and more accurate.
>
>If you have specific proposals for improv
Hello Stefan,
I had that same error a couple of hours ago and I fixed like this on my
bash script:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
TEMP_DIR=temp
INPUT_FILE=yourfile.lytex
OUTPUT_FILE=yourfile.pdf
CURRENT_DIR=$(pwd)
lilypond-book --pdf \
--include="$CURRENT_DIR" \
--output="$TEMP
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:05:22AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> thanks for the report - I forwarded it to the bug list:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Lyric-extender-lines-and-rests-after-line-break-td132414.html
>
> Eluze
>
Thanks, Eluze and Davide. I've created a tracker for this issue here:
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Gentry"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 7:55 PM
Subject: RE:Markup query
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 03:36:40 -0700 Graham Percival wrote
Notation A.10 is intended to give such a source of definitions.
- Graham
Ah I had downloaded all twelve of t
36 matches
Mail list logo
