On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:25:14 -0700 Nathan <when.possi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Brett McCoy <idragos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> > >> Well, I found LilyPond rated on a download site > >> <URL:http://download.cnet.com/LilyPond/3000-2141_4-73566.html#rateit>. > >> The download info appears more or less accurate, the reviews appear to > >> be from 2.12. But I doubt that they would have changed significantly > >> with 2.16... > > > > "The interface is extremely primitive. The programmer probably just > > doesn't know Windows programming. " > > > > That made me laugh somewhat out loud. > > This bit made me chuckle: > > "There was also an open CMD window. Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but > it struck me as suspicious. Why would a true Windows program have a > CMD window and need user interaction to start?" > They have discovered the true nature of Lilypond. An elaborate virus. But since the Lilypond devs never learned proper windows programming the virus failed so far. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
