Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/8/19 Marc Hohl :
Carl, do you have any hints where to start such an enhancement?
If you search for `separator' you should find the code which splits
the music into voices. It will have a context-spec-music block which
will need amending to use Bottom rather
Patrick Schmidt schrieb:
Hi Marc,
I actually sent two enhancement requests to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org one week ago
(13 Aug. 2009). I wonder what happened to them. (Enhancement request: automatic
polyphony in TabStaff context; Enhancement request: Automatic glissando marks
in chords). Where can
On 8/19/09 9:46 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen schrieb:
>> [...]
>> Make a simple snippet that shows the problem (you don't need to include the
>> Staff, just the TabStaff) and send it to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org with a subject
>> like
>>
>> Enhancement request: automatic polyphony in Ta
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:04:41PM +0200, denis.roe...@loria.fr wrote:
>
>> My first instinct is that something like this could be fixed,
>> although not without a proper minimal example.
>
> Sorry, I should have posted a minimal example. Here is one:
>
> http://www.loria.fr/~roegel/tmp/test.tex
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:51:40AM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> What I do not understand is how "mere" bugfixes are irrelevant to the
> user of stable releases. Seems to me that fixes are the most important
> factors, if not the only factors, in making a choice of *minor* versions
> of stab
2009/8/16 Graham Percival :
> (nobody checks the regression tests for each release, for example
> -- and that's trivially done with a web browser!)
As far as I can remember, Stan Sanderson was in charge of the regtest
checking (but perhaps this needs to be updated?).
That being said, I am able (
2009/8/19 Alexander Kobel :
> Does "fixed in the developement branch" also mean it's fixed in the docs for
> upcoming releases of the stable branch, too, by the way?
Yes, it was backported a few weeks ago, so should be fixed whenever
2.13.3 gets released.
Regards,
Neil
Ah, I understand. nano loads a config file when it starts, so if a
file's extension matches any of the ones defined in the config file,
it then loads the appropriate syntax.
As to what I decided to hilight. That was a completely personal
issue, and since it was my first (and only) attempt a
Hi,
I'd like to create a command that will create a textual crescendo split
into three parts : cre - - - scen - - - do, with the following properties :
- aligned on dynamic-line (well, like \crescTextCresc) ;
- with the "scen" part in the middle (X-axis speaking) of "cre" and
"do" (that shou
Robert Keller wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
lasconic wrote:
I took some time yesterday night to take a look to improvisor code and
estimate the cost of adding musicXML export. Import is indeed more
complicated.
I downloaded the code of improvisor 3.39. It's the
Hi Marc,
I actually sent two enhancement requests to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org one week ago
(13 Aug. 2009). I wonder what happened to them. (Enhancement request: automatic
polyphony in TabStaff context; Enhancement request: Automatic glissando marks
in chords). Where can I see what's on the tracker
Mats Bengtsson wrote Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:15 PM
(see also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-05/msg00016.html
which exploits an still undocumented feature/bug).
Hhm. This doesn't seem to work with Voice
contexts. If you take the first example in
5.1.3 and comment
2009/8/19 Marc Hohl :
> Carl, do you have any hints where to start such an enhancement?
If you search for `separator' you should find the code which splits
the music into voices. It will have a context-spec-music block which
will need amending to use Bottom rather than Voice to ensure the split
Mats Bengtsson schrieb:
Carl Sorensen wrote:
You forgot that tabStaff needs tabVoice, and both of your constructs
used
Voice contexts, instead of tabVoice contexts.
The first, << ... \\ ... >>, implicitly creates Voice contexts.
The second explicitly creates Voice contexts.
I think you'v
James E. Bailey-3 wrote:
>
> No searching, or maybe I misunderstand what you mean.
>
i guess you had to apply this regex to a file or files - were these all
lilypond (program-) files or did you go thru the docs or what?
an additional question of course is, if you found *all* lilypond
express
Carl Sorensen wrote:
You forgot that tabStaff needs tabVoice, and both of your constructs used
Voice contexts, instead of tabVoice contexts.
The first, << ... \\ ... >>, implicitly creates Voice contexts.
The second explicitly creates Voice contexts.
I think you've found a good enhancement
In my text, I write "\fbox{a} is ...", but my \fbox{a} isn't spaced
exactly like the box produced by stencil. There are probably many examples
like this. I can live with them, but it could also be improved.
My first instinct is that something like this could be fixed,
although not without a pr
I looked in the nano documentation on how to create a syntax
definition. It said that it was all regex. Then I went to wikipedia
and read how to do regex. That's it really. No searching, or maybe I
misunderstand what you mean.
On 19.08.2009, at 01:25, -Eluze wrote:
James E. Bailey-3 wro
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
[...]
Make a simple snippet that shows the problem (you don't need to include the
Staff, just the TabStaff) and send it to bug-lilyp...@gnu.org with a subject
like
Enhancement request: automatic polyphony in TabStaff context
As nobody has added this to the tracker (as
On Tuesday 18 August 2009, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 17 août 2009 à 16:20 -0400, David Raleigh Arnold a écrit :
> > You do a great job summarizing the minor versions of the development
> > versions, but there is nothing in news-gmane-lilypond.devel about
stable
> > minor changes.
>
> The
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> The makam pitches contain 1/9-tone alterations,
> so they will not fit into the existing note-name
> tables. It will need, as you, Joseph, suggested
> a new subsection in 1.1.1. for non-Western pitches.
> Let's use that as the heading. The material there
> should be restri
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Alexander Kobel wrote Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:03 PM
the last sentence in NR 6.8, "Difficult tweaks", should probably read
"Note, however, that \override, applied to _NonMusicalPaperColumn_ and
PaperColumn, still works as expected within \context blocks."
instead of
"
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:10 AM
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:00:10PM +0100, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Trevor: the actual table goes in pitches.itely (obviously),
>> while
>> we should add a NR 2.9.2 Makam or Turkish or something. I
>> guess
>>
23 matches
Mail list logo
