On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:51:40AM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote: > What I do not understand is how "mere" bugfixes are irrelevant to the > user of stable releases. Seems to me that fixes are the most important > factors, if not the only factors, in making a choice of *minor* versions > of stable releases. I don't see how the git file helps the user, > because there is usually ;-) more than a week between releases. The > NEWS file does not explain the difference between 2.12.1 and 2.12.2. > Apparently, nothing does.
Nothing does? We told you what does. The git log explains it exactly. Now, that's more information than you want, but that's your problem, not ours. > Perhaps you could solicit volunteers Perhaps, since *you* want a summary of the git log, *you* could volunteer to write such a summary for each stable release. I have enough trouble finding volunteers to handle tasks which delay releases and other major projects. I'm definitely not going to ask anybody to spend time on this. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
