This is more of this problem.
I said before the installation appeared correct. I get different
errors, however, depending on whether I run Lilypond under or Win or
Cygwin. Under Cygwin the following:
GNU LilyPond 2.4.6
Processing `test.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music... error: ca
On 10-May-05, at 3:20 PM, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
I don't know if it is me or a bug but dynamic marks are not pretty
italic fonts, rather they are big ugly fonts:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
Dynamics.html
Other than the "p" and "f", there's nothing wr
On 10-May-05, at 7:43 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
I believe I saw a posting about this but have not found it in the
archives. Pieces which typeset correctly using v2.5.22 do not display
instrument names when typeset with 2.5.23.
Reported about eight hours ago to bug-lilypond, but I doubt the mailis
Was using v2.5.23 on Mac OS 10.3.9, have reverted to 2.5.22-2
I believe I saw a posting about this but have not found it in the
archives. Pieces which typeset correctly using v2.5.22 do not display
instrument names when typeset with 2.5.23.
e.g.,
\set Staff.instrument = \markup { \column { "Trum
I appear to have a good installation of Cygwin and Lilypond in that all
components appear to be there. But when I compile any of the tests,
such as EXAMPLE-1.LY, I persistently get a message that it can't find
FETA20.AFM. However, it's clearly there under LILYPOND\2.4.6\FONTS.
Compiling wit
I don't know if it is me or a bug but dynamic marks are not pretty
italic fonts, rather they are big ugly fonts:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.5/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Dynamics.html
If I'm the only one with this problem, I'll post my own example of
output for help.
__
If one played b c b as a triplet, then this is what I would call an
inverted mordent and I would use a mordent with a slash through it.
Can I make this happen (2.5.23)?
I did find a reference that a prall is the same as an inverted mordent.
http://www.answers.com/mordent
The prall symbol in lilyp
Title: Strange fonts
Hi,
I have installed Lily 2.4.5 from tarball onto a Gentoo system.
However, all the output (including the doc examples) have only basic font rendering.
The fonts have funny spacing and it looks like it isn't linking to decent fonts.
Difficult to explain, really.
Where co
2.5.23 MacOS 10.3.9
Hi!
I have some questions relating to the file enclosed below.
1) First, a possible bug: My glissando in the first measure dissappeared
(but the gliss between measures 11/12 is present). I think it happened
when I implemented the voltas (please correct my pluralization if I ha
Rerun setup.exe and make sure that the latest, 2.4.6-1 lilypond version
is selected.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I downloaded and installed cygwin and lilypond for windows. now when I
try to run lilypond I got the following error message:
PDF output not found. Error log:
In unknown file:
?: 32* [get-coding-vector "latin1"]
In /usr/share/lilypond/2.4.2/scm/encoding.scm:
124: 33* [caddr ...
124: 34* [get-
You could always play with
\once \override Dots #'extra-offset = #'(2 . 0)
but the results will be fairly unreliable when the spacing changes.
/Mats
Laura Conrad wrote:
Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
It's fairly common in modern mensurstriche editions, and
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-01/msg00123.html
The score-override-auto-beam-setting function is included in LilyPond
by now, so there's no need to copy the Scheme code in the answer.
The first alternative in the answer cited above can be rewritten in
a slightly smoother
Can I specify something like
#(override-auto-beam-setting '(end * * 5 8) 3 8)
in a \layout{ \context { \Score foo }}} ?
I'd like to specify a number of irregular beaming settings in a file
which can be \include'd in many other files. I know how to do that
with regular \set and \override commands,
Do we have a way to put the barline between the notehead and the dot?
It's fairly common in modern mensurstriche editions, and the later
Dowland facsimiles that I'm transcribing these days do it as well.
I mean a case like:
\time 4/4
a4 b4 c4 d4. | e8
It would be good to be able to tell lilypon
Graham Percival wrote:
Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
command?
This produces the output I want:
\version "2.5.23"
#(def-markup-command (tempoMark layout props str) (markup?)
(interpret-markup layout props
(markup #:bold #:large str)))
\relative c'' {
c
The referenced email says "add ".pfa" to each end of line" which
I guess is intended to say "add .pfa to the end of each line".
The line with ecbx is just an example showing what you should do
to every line of the file.
/Mats
Hugo Solis wrote:
I get an error and after reading in the archives I f
On 10-May-05, at 5:53 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2005 19:41:46 -0700
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
command?
You can include lilypond code with #{ and #}, and also insert arguments
therein. See the manu
I get an error and after reading in the archives I found the solution but there mark ask for changing ecbx10 and the one that I had to change was ecrm10,,, just if somebody is as lost as me...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-03/msg00033.html
dvips: ! Couldn't find header
A new version of lilypond will be available on the mirrors soon.
Enjoy.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Monday 09 May 2005 13.46, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I can confirm the bug on Cygwin 2.4.3 as well as Erik's observation
that it doesn't happen in 2.4.6. Unfortunately, I have no idea on
what could have changed between the versions that affects this.
Is there a difference betwe
On Monday 09 May 2005 13.46, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I can confirm the bug on Cygwin 2.4.3 as well as Erik's observation
> that it doesn't happen in 2.4.6. Unfortunately, I have no idea on
> what could have changed between the versions that affects this.
Is there a difference between different ver
On Mon, 09 May 2005 19:41:46 -0700
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to define a \markup macro that looks like a lilypond
> command?
>
> This produces the output I want:
>
> \version "2.5.23"
> #(def-markup-command (tempoMark layout props str) (markup?)
>(interpret
hi arjan,
thanks, that got me a useable LilyPond mode in emacs.
i still have to load it by hand with the M-x load-library, and i think
it only works when i load the lilypond-init.el despite the "autoload"
in the .emacs file, opening an .ly file doesn't automatically load the
mode.
when i try to
24 matches
Mail list logo
