On Monday 15 March 2004 15:19, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> \remove "Note_performer"
Thnx a lot! :)
--
Yours truly, WBR, Paul Argentoff.
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIPE: PA1291-RIPE
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mai
On Monday 15 March 2004 6:02 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > 3. How can I include a transposed series of lead sheet chords above the
> > second of the two staves?
>
> \transpose should work well also on chords.
Actually, it's not the transposition I'm looking to do. It's the actual
placement o
David,
I tested your code with Bert's suggestions about the minimum vertical extent. I was
curious about this myself. I think this might be what you want.
cue = \set fontSize = #-5
part = \set fontSize = #0
VoxCues = \notes \context Voice \relative c' {
<<
{
<<
On Monday March 15 2004 05:06, you wrote:
> > I meant notated and was thinking something along the lines of stacked
> > dynamics like lyric stanzas (or like you were mentioning) might be a way
> > it is professionally done; I was guessing. Is there a LilyPond way?
>
> Lookup the section on text m
On Monday 15 March 2004 10:04, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> I only meant the list as a starting point.
>
> I disagree that you shouldn't use "redundant"
> notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
> is C9sus4 and C11. A higher chord extension suggests a
> different way of voicing the chord.
I'm not disagreeing with your logic on jazz chord notation. I'm sure that
traditionally it would
be the right system, and perhaps we could highlight the "proper" chords in the
documentation. I'm
merely saying Lilypond should accomodate those who want strange chord symbols and
other weird
things
I founded some important but not very well documented feature. It is
important when you use G_8 clef with lyrics, because using the same
minimumVerticalExtent, the lyrics won't be in the same distance from the
staff, as with a G or F clef (it is because the 8 in the clef).
If you want to set the v
Your mail to 'xml' with the subject
Re: Your music
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator
On Monday 15 March 2004 16:48, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> On Monday 15 March 2004 10:04, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> > I only meant the list as a starting point.
> >
> > I disagree that you shouldn't use "redundant"
> > notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
> > is C9sus4 and C11. A h
Hi,
meanwhile (following another tip from Mats, thanks! :)
I've changed the two lines
\input titledefs.tex
\def\preLilyPondExample{\def\mustmakelilypondtitle{}}
to
\input{titledefs}
\def\mustmakelilypondtitle{}
Now it works, but only for the first piece of music (lilypondfile),
Hello list, hello Mats,
You wrote:
> See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-02/msg00124.html
>
> /Mats
Thanks.
This partially solves another problem (headers with lilypond-book).
See my second Mail there.
Regards Roland
Are you talking about cygwin mirrors?
If so, try running setup.exe again. Note that cygwin mirrors only contain
the stable (2.0.1) version. For development versions see
http://lilypond.org/web/download/
Bert
> I checked about 20 of the mirrors, but none of them show
> lilypond as available. C
Hi,
I am trying to download lilypond but when I try to test it all I get is this text
% This file has ledger lines and a slur
\score { \notes { c4-( c4-) } }
I'm not sure what is happening but I would love some guidance. ThanksMarcus
___
Lilypond-us
Will Oram wrote:
Everything else, it's failed:
FYI your file converts fine here, with the following output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atte]$ convert-ly will.ly
convert-ly (GNU LilyPond) 2.1.30
Processing `will.ly' ... Applying conversions: 2.1.29, 2.1.30,
\version "2.1.30"
spacing = \notes {
\partial
Hi at all,
to get the headers from my lilypondfiles I have to put the following
lines in my buch-probe.tex - file:
\input titledefs.tex
\def\preLilyPondExample{\def\mustmakelilypondtitle{}}
But:
Running lilypond-book on buch-probe.tex creates the notes from
my .ly - files WITHOUT any hea
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> I have always wondered why we must "build" the chord
> manually. Who uses block chords these days? Wouldn't
> it be simpler to say C:2 should look like Cadd2,
> specify the markup for the chord expression, treating
> chords merely like lyrics and marku
I check the changelog obsessively with each new version -- between .28
and .30, I couldn't identify any changes that affected me. I wasn't
aware of convert-ly -s -- very useful; thank you. From the list, only
\center applies to me...I hope.
The problem still remains, however. It appears others
Le Dimanche 14 Mars 2004 22:09, GoochRules! a écrit :
> Greetings,
>
> Does lilypond handle "f8( f4)" and "f8~ f4" differently? Is ...~ ...
> simply a short cut for ...( ...)? What about "f8( f1)( f2)" vs. f8~
> f1~ f2?
>
>
> --M Peltzer
As indicated in the glossary (not only for non-Engli
I checked about 20 of the mirrors, but none of them show lilypond as available. Can
you point me to a download site that has the file? Thanks. Paul OBrien.
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-
Subject of the message: [JSpamFilter] Re: Approved
Recipient of the message: Dead Letter
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
The Postscript code used to draw the beams, just specifies a rectangle
with straight lines between the corners, so the jagged look all depends
on what you have done to the file and how you view it.
I assume that you refer to what the score looks like when you view
a PDF version of it with Acrobat.
Hi:
This may not be a lilypond issue, but I'm asking the list anyway.
I've been asked to provide online samples with "smoother" beams; the
complaint is that the sloped beams are jagged-looking (even though they
look fine when they're printed out).
Is there a tweak that will make the beams a li
Hi
I'm trying to convert some files from 2.1.5 to 2.1.30, but
1) \pianoAccidentals gets converted wrong. Instead of
"#(set-accidental-style 'piano')" I get "#(set-accidental-style 'piano)'
, str)".
Not that bad, I simply corrected the few places by hand.
2) convert-ly chokes on the attached (
The current set in Lilypond isn't bad by any means,
and yes there were some redundant chords in my list. I
was just trying to point out that there are different
"styles" of notating chords and Lilypond should try to
be inclusive. For example, Csus2/add3 and
Csus2/sus4/add3 are unwieldy, preferred i
I have always wondered why we must "build" the chord
manually. Who uses block chords these days? Wouldn't
it be simpler to say C:2 should look like Cadd2,
specify the markup for the chord expression, treating
chords merely like lyrics and markup, instead of tying
them to notes? Or am I missing some
I only meant the list as a starting point.
I disagree that you shouldn't use "redundant"
notation. Cadd9 is different from Cadd2 or Csus2. As
is C9sus4 and C11. A higher chord extension suggests a
different way of voicing the chord. The 2 in there
suggests that you want the 2 and 3 or 2 and 1
prod
What I simply meant to suggest with the list was that
we should be allowed to specify jazz notation in a
more flexible manner, rather than be tied to
Lilypond's default set. I know there is a way to
modify the settings but I haven't figured it out yet.
__
Do you Yah
See http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2004-02/msg00124.html
/Mats
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hi at all,
since about two days I use lilypond version 2.1.28, and I'm very happy
with it. :)
Nevertheless I can't figure out how to determine the textheigt of page
layout (In the past, with v
On Monday 15 March 2004 05:58, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> I feel that there aren't enough chord names in
> Lilypond to adequately cover most people's needs. A
> jazz chord system at minimum needs to cover the
> following chords:
>
> major
> minor
That is an interesting list. I don't think you need
Tiffany Weisman writes:
> Currently C:2 gives Csus2. I would like Cadd2 in
> addition. The manual is not very helpful on how to
> customize chord names. Can someone help me with this?
You can try c:2.3 , does that help?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> Currently C:2 gives Csus2. I would like Cadd2 in
> addition. The manual is not very helpful on how to
> customize chord names. Can someone help me with this?
Tiffany,
It's quite straightforward to redefine the chord definitions. You can
find an exam
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:08:06PM -0800, Tiffany Weisman wrote:
> Currently C:2 gives Csus2. I would like Cadd2 in
> addition. The manual is not very helpful on how to
> customize chord names. Can someone help me with this?
Could you use Cadd9 (c:add9) instead?
--
Blake Garretson --- http://b
The following lines should turn off the MIDI output for chords:
\score{
...
\midi{
...
\translator{
\ChordNameVoiceContext
\remove "Note_performer"
}
}
}
/Mats
Paul Argentoff wrote:
Hello All.
How can I suppress the output of notated chord names (sounds like piano
If you use the correct combination of upper case and lower case letters,
in MultiMeasureRest, I think your solution will work.
/Mats
David Bobroff wrote:
I want to adjust the staff-position of a single MultiMeasureRest. That
is, I have an R1 that I want to place hanging from the top staff line
I hope you have tried what I suggested in the first response:
Just rerun setup.exe and make sure to follow the instructions at
http://lilypond.org/web/download/windows.html on how to select
the lilypond package.
If it still doesn't work, please read more at the bottom of that
WWW page to see what
The mailing list has been extremely slow during the last weeks
due to the enormous amounts of virus emails swirling around.
When you send questions to the list, please always tell what
LilyPond version you use (and on what kind of system if you
have any question related to the installation).
Lyle R
On Sunday 14 March 2004 22.09, GoochRules! wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Does lilypond handle "f8( f4)" and "f8~ f4" differently? Is ...~ ...
> simply a short cut for ...( ...)? What about "f8( f1)( f2)" vs. f8~
> f1~ f2?
There is a difference in what it means. f8~f basically means f4, while f8(
David Bobroff wrote:
Thanks for the \grace {skip} suggestion. I haven't tried it yet.
Somewhat related to this thread:
I want to use the "slash" style grace without a slur. I discovered in
the acciaccatura definition that this is done with some bit of scheme
which I don't remember at the mome
I just tried your file here and I can't repeat your error.
To find out what convert-ly is trying to do, just run
convert-ly -s
You can also take a look at the ChangeLog file.
/Mats
Will Oram wrote:
I just installed .30 on my OS X machine. lilypond now pukes when I input
my old score code. conv
Graham, Mats,
I tried the installation again, but my PC still doesn't have any association for
.ly files.
This may seem a silly question, but is Lilypond a part of Cygwin (or the other
way round)? Could I be missing the Lilypond program?
I have something called "Cygwin Bash Shell" on my menu, w
First of all, read the release notes of version 2.1.29,
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-lilypond/2004-03/msg2.html
/Mats
Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
Hello,
I have noticed recently that lilypond produces "empty" midi-tracks
sometimes. I have already tested several *.ly files I had writ
41 matches
Mail list logo
