I have always wondered why we must "build" the chord manually. Who uses block chords these days? Wouldn't it be simpler to say C:2 should look like Cadd2, specify the markup for the chord expression, treating chords merely like lyrics and markup, instead of tying them to notes? Or am I missing something here.
--- Nick Busigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tiffany, > > It's quite straightforward to redefine the chord > definitions. You can > find an example of this on the LilyPond regression > page. For a practical > example, you can also take a look at a lead sheet > for a song my wife > wrote and typeset with LilyPond: > > http://www.songbirdofswing.com/selkirk_folio/balilli_island/lily/balilli_island.ly > > Note, the above LilyPond file used version 2.1.6. > You may have to run > 'convert-ly -e balilli_island.ly' to have it work > with a later version. > > Hope this helps. > > Nick > > ==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com > -------================== > Nick Busigin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Visit Our Indie Jazz CD Construction > Project! > > ==============------- www.SongBirdofSwing.com > -------================== > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
