ys done.
So I wonder why the tests passed and my own patchy merge passed but
yours failed?
I am just worried that the veracity of my patch testing is not good enough
regards
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 27/07/2019 10:10, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
On 26/07/2019 19:36, David Kastrup wrote:
...
I run Patchy when I notice something went to staging. Due to its cost,
I tend to abort it when I discover someone else pushing before me.
So it would appear that your repository
Review:
No patches in review at this time.
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
at this time.
*Review:*
No patches in review at this time.
*New:*
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5543
http://codereview.appspot.com/544870043
Countdown: No patches on countdown at this time.
Review: No patches in review at this time.
New: No new patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
September 3rd.
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
Push:
5550 ly: hel-arabic - comment out Sahnaz entry - James
countdown at this time.
Review:
No patches in Review at this time
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
countdown at this time.
Review:
No patches in Review at this time
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
countdown at this time.
Review:
No patches in Review at this time
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
es/issues/5554/
That way I we can start the patch review process proper!.
Welcome aboard.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
a new script somewhere that works with SourceForge. Maybe this
script can be deleted?
I wonder whether James can upload his script to the repository...
Werner
I'm 99% certain James doesn't use this shell script.
It doesn't work with Source Forge. It was used with Googl
countdown at this time.
Review:
No patches in Review at this time
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
et me know what, if anything, I can do to help.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
:
No patches in Review at this time
New:
No New patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
ues/issues/5559
http://codereview.appspot.com/568970043
5558 NR: add many index entries for snippets - Werner LEMBERG
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5558
http://codereview.appspot.com/544990043
New:
No new patches at this time.
***
Regard
/568970043
New:
5563 make edges of brackets dashable - Malte Meyn
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5563
http://codereview.appspot.com/581060043
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lis
.
New:
5562 crash: Assertion `!is_empty ()' failed. - Malte Meyn
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5562
http://codereview.appspot.com/546970043
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
70043
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2: warning: ignoring old recipe for
target 'local-test'
GNUmakefile:25: warning: overriding recipe for target
'out/collated-files.list'
../../../make/lysdoc-rules.make:6: warning: ignoring old recipe for
target 'out/collated-files.list'
GNUmakefile:30: warning: over
cat | sed | sed - Dan Eble
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5571
http://codereview.appspot.com/551070043
New:
No new patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https
.
New:
5574 freetype.cc: Fix compiler warnings.
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5574
http://codereview.appspot.com/573140043
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
There is one additional New Patch - it had an incorrect status so it was
missed from my check
5573 python: replace <> with != - masterodin
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5573
http://codereview.appspot.com/561060043
___
lilypond-devel m
issues/issues/5578
http://codereview.appspot.com/566920043
5577 scripts/build: Remove unused scripts - hahnjo
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5577
http://codereview.appspot.com/551100044
***
Regards,
James
___
lilypond-devel mailin
/midi/out-test/tree.gittxt
no source for input/regression/midi/out-test/sequence-name-2.midi
output-distance summary:
3 changed
467 below threshold
3562 unchanged
writing
/home/james/lilypond-git/build/out/test-results/input/regression/out-test-baseline/test-output-distance.png
writing
. That
is not my responsibility. I just run build commands to test patches and
make sure the reg test diffs (if there are any) are OK visually or not.
I am just a glorified administrator that tries to keep track of patches
so that developers can get on developing.
So no patch testing again today eith
Hello,
On 28/10/2019 18:19, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
Am Samstag, den 26.10.2019, 08:43 +0100 schrieb James:
1. ./autogen --noconfigure
2. mkdir build
3. cd build
4 ../configure --disable-optimising
5. make -j7 CPU_COUNT=7
6. make -j7 CPU_COUNT=7 test-baseline
7. make -j7 CPU_COUNT=7 check
lilyissues/issues/5576
http://codereview.appspot.com/563120043
***
Regards,
James
/5578
http://codereview.appspot.com/566920043
***
Regards,
James
.
Review:
No patches in Review.
New:
No New patches.
***
Regards,
James
l Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change: monotonic is both
needed and unneeded (22.1885,310.434)->(25.9951,304.135). x=25.9951
(prev=8.40259)
Of course they have 'always' (probably) been there - I don't want to
claim anything like a regression.
But do we need to care?
James
On 05/11/2019 12:06, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
Hello,
Now that Dan has made default make commands 'terser' I am noticing
while building our fonts that I see quite a few 'errors' that look
like this:
Internal Error (overlap) in clefs.petrucci.c5_change: Winding n
ul to those that
wouldn't be intimidated by doing such a set of steps but who had less
knowledge about fonts/fontforge and our make process like yourself. Then
others could open tickets with FF instead of just relying on you.
Thanks
James
ssues/5599
http://codereview.appspot.com/559240043
New: No new patches at this time
***
Regards,
James
David,
On 15/11/2019 13:31, David Nalesnik wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:31 AM James Lowe wrote:
David et al.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:33:01 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi David,
I feel responsible for this because I know where this is coming from ;-)
You can send me the patch. However
0043
5602 Implement MeasureAttachedSpanner - David Nalesnik
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5602
http://codereview.appspot.com/571180043
New:
No new patches at this time
***
Regards,
James
://codereview.appspot.com/553170043
New:
No new patches at this time
***
Regards,
James
/5608
http://codereview.appspot.com/573270043
5607 typedef System::rank_type - Dan Eble
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5607
http://codereview.appspot.com/581270043
***
Regards,
James
E***
ar: creating out/library.a
Making lily/out/parser.hh < yy
...
--snip--
I obviously don't know if this matters but wondered if it would be
interesting to someone who might?
Regards
James
es/issues/5610
http://codereview.appspot.com/577130043
***
Regards,
James
Looks like this hasn't been merged yet.
On 15/11/2019 15:15, Dan Eble wrote:
Please review. This handles a couple of details I'd rather not have to
remember to do when submitting the patch or fix after the fact. I've exercised
these changes for the last few LilyPond patches I've uploaded.
h
r me, even after a fresh
I don't like being 'that guy' but ... it works for me.
I built LP following your steps then did the commands below:
--snip--
james@Zeus:~/lilypond-git/build$ cd Documentation/
james@Zeus:~/lilypond-git/build/Documentation$ touch
../../Documentation/cha
Hello,
I saw master and staging were OoS and ran patchy but got this error:
--snip--
fatal: unable to connect to git.sv.gnu.org:
git.sv.gnu.org[0: 209.51.188.201]: errno=No route to host
git.sv.gnu.org[1: 2001:470:142:5::201]: errno=Network is unreachable
--snip--
James
.com/571180043
Review:
5618 configure: Fix tests for compiler warning flags. - Werner LEMBERG
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5618
http://codereview.appspot.com/551210043
New:
No new Patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
rceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5619
http://codereview.appspot.com/569120043
***
Regards,
James
y the fact that
they get compiled without complaint during test-baseline and check is
enough.
At least that is how I understand it.
James
on some of the infrastructure recently, so maybe I can help you.
I also found this:
./input/regression/musicxml/book-musicxml-testsuite.py
I remembered https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3607/ and
it mentions it there.
James
://codereview.appspot.com/551210043
Review:
No patches in Review at this time.
New:
No new patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
ttp://codereview.appspot.com/545320043
New:
No new patches at this time.
***
Regards,
James
com/571210043
***
Regards,
James
hould I be testing patches with required AND non-required
components installed? Or should I be testing them with ONLY required
components but then we should make patchy-staging use required AND
non-required?
Else we get into a mess with who has what on which system they happen to
be building from.
James
Hello
On 07/12/2019 10:57, Thomas Morley wrote:
Hi James,
Am Sa., 7. Dez. 2019 um 11:43 Uhr schrieb James :
Hello
On 07/12/2019 09:36, Thomas Morley wrote:
Am Fr., 6. Dez. 2019 um 20:45 Uhr schrieb Dan Eble :
$ tidy --version
HTML Tidy for Linux version 5.2.0
I'll try to get it an
/5632
http://codereview.appspot.com/549270043
***
Regards,
James
://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5647 [2]
http://codereview.appspot.com/559340043 [3]
5601 Changes.tely (2.20): afterGrace command got an optional argument
that should be documented - James Lowe
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5601 [4]
http://codereview.appspot.com
optional argument
that should be documented - James Lowe
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5601 [2]
http://codereview.appspot.com/551260043
COUNTDOWN:
5657 Remove vestiges of support for systems without - Dan Eble
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5657 [3]
http
://codereview.appspot.com/549350043 [9]
5653 Cleanup unneeded parts of Stepmake - Jonas Hahnfeld
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5653 [10]
http://codereview.appspot.com/577280043 [11]
5601 Changes.tely (2.20): afterGrace command got an optional argument
that should be documented - James Lowe
https
On 22.01.2020 11:06, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
these were sent before I had access, I think. Can you folksk have a
look?
https://codereview.appspot.com/559370043/
https://codereview.appspot.com/581470047/
I'll follow up
---
Regards
James
Hello
---
Regards
James
On 22.01.2020 11:06, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
these were sent before I had access, I think. Can you folksk have a
look?
https://codereview.appspot.com/559370043/
This is https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5669/
https://codereview.appspot.com
ttp://codereview.appspot.com/581470047 [41]
***
Regards,
James
Links:
--
[1] http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5695
[3] http://codereview.appspot.com/575530107
[4] https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5694
[5] h
]
http://codereview.appspot.com/555160043 [53]
WAITING:
5688 Announce end of multi-measure-rest - hanwen
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5688 [54]
http://codereview.appspot.com/561310045 [55] ***
Regards,
James
Links:
--
[1] http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
[2]
meone with
his terse emails.
Yes I have read the to me, empty discussion, but still have no idea what
the point is.
---
Regards
James
lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1103
!913 release: binaries with cairo - Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/913
--
Regards
James
Hello,
I am going to stop doing the Patch countdown at the end of this month.
I'll continue for the next few weeks, but my last countdown will be
whatever the last date in January ends up being.
Thanks for your understanding.
--
Regards
James
iro - Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/913
--
Regards
James
this time.
Waiting:
!1136 \break implies \bar "" when needed - Dan Eble
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1136
!913 release: binaries with cairo - Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/913
--
Regards
James
ts/1136
!1103 output-distance: use ImageMagick's compare for visual comparisons
- Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1103
!913 release: binaries with cairo - Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/913
--
Regards
James
al comparisons
- Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1103
!913 release: binaries with cairo - Han-Wen Nienhuys
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/913
--
Regards
James
ere is at least some percieved semblance of a hand-over.
One thought in passing: we need to update the Contributor's
Guide as well as http://lilypond.org/authors.html. James,
how should you be called on the latter page?
Documentation and Patch Meister
?
--
Regards
James
been part of what LilyPond has become.
best wishes and farewell.
James
A list of all merge requests can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?sort=label_priority
Push:
!1156 defaultBarType -> measureBarType - Dan Eble
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilyp
your time.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes:
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 03:27:38PM +0000, James Lowe wrote:
> >
> > I get no messages at all.
>
> Try scrolling up -- if there's some kinds of errors, lilypond will
> print an error message, and then give the
ssage(s) do you get when you try to run lilypond?
>
Now I ran the full path to both the app and the ly file (as per the instructions
- I didn't set up any scripts, much too complicated :) )
Now this is what I get.
james-iMac:~ james$
../../../../Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resourc
r way I am happy to help editing the docs, but
I have tracker items I am working on.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
.
If I get permission (or if someone else would like to) I suggest we make
a tracker item for this one until I (someone) gets round to it.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
nel security updates that came in since the weekend
that I have yet to apply.
But I did quick sanity check and touched notation.itely and re-did a
make doc and it all worked ok.
Does this help?
james
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
nd while I have gotten compilation to
work on later versions of Ubuntu (I haven't tried fedora) there is no
need to really upgrade from 9.0.4 if all you are doing is LilyPond dev
work work at least from my own experience.
Regards
James
___
On 15/09/2010 12:40, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:39:26AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Valentin Villenave writes:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
You know, after rebuffs like this it's hard
ts. I even did a
clean install of the whole repository a few days ago to see if this was
just 'one of those things' but it seems that it comes and goes.
It's not a big deal but I wondered if anyone had had the same issues?
James
__
-markup
bottom-system system-bottom
between-scores-system score-system
Why do we have
'top-system' but 'system-bottom' and not instead, 'bottom-system'?
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://
Hello,
On 12/10/2010 12:54, David Kastrup wrote:
James writes:
Hello,
On 12/10/2010 10:13, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 2010-10-09 17:46, Mark Polesky wrote:
CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME
-
top-system top-system
top-title top-markup
between-title markup-markup
after
Hello,
Can anyone tell me what
\layout {
interscoreline = 1
...
}
Does?
This is in a couple of Doc @LilyPond examples
However if I try to compile the example with this explicit line
commented in or out it does not seem to do anything in 2.13.35
Thank you for your time.
James
a score.
I hope that makes sense. At the moment I am just seeing this change for
change's sake.
james
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
. I have just done a clean uninstall and reinstall though.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On 26/10/2010 23:12, Francisco Vila wrote:
2010/10/26 James Lowe:
\version "2.13.35"
I can not reproduce your symptoms on current Git version, compiled
today. You could always try 2.13.37.
I did try 2.13.37 and you are correct. The issue has 'gone away
s before I can
check visually.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 31/10/2010 22:50, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, James Lowe wrote:
If it's being used as a 'proper noun' it would be capitalised.
I fail to see how it is a proper noun. "Clefs that are normal" ->
adjective, isn't it?
Yes
we use noun-adjective-noun or
noun-noun-verb or whatever we are trying to do here.
Yours (a regular non-developy person trying to be constructive)
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
e the programs distributed with
LilyPond version 2.13.38.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/usage/index.html
This is the Internals Reference (IR) for version 2.13.38 of LilyPond,
the GNU music typesetter.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/internals/index.html
these emails.
See the irony?
;)
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
NOT our manual) which I happened to find
quite useful for a good general over view of what the product does.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Francisco,
On 08/11/2010 11:38, Francisco Vila wrote:
James: did you maybe have an answer to this question on another
thread? I am also interested. Docs say something but they could be
possibly clearer on this subject. I'd like to improve this situation.
I had no specific answer. As my
Hello,
On 08/11/2010 12:00, James wrote:
I am not a developer so do not know the internal workings of the code,
however the above tracker is a doc bug..
Sorry that was probably badly worded, it is an 'open issue'. ;)
James
___
lily
this.
Thanks for your patience.
James
PS: @Graham: The CG instructons (loading git-cl etc) went fine, in fact
the only issue I had was knowing what to write in the description and
setting up my .profile for git-cl :)
___
lilypond-devel ma
bracket on the last measure of the repeated section with '1-4' on it.
Isn't that better?
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
11:00 GMT everything for me
compiled doc wise, but if someone 'announce' when everything is ok I'd
appreciate it :)
Thank you for your consideration.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
) Sys Admins are cure,
bernie, and peabo. See also fsfsys group.
Aliases
fsfsys gnustatus gnusys
However I still cannot open
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git
as of 12:12 GMT.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel
hello,
This is (I hope) a relatively trivial patch for the Learning Manual
http://codereview.appspot.com/3369041
Just a removal of all 'fragment' instances in the @Lilypond examples.
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-dev
On 02/12/2010 09:42, Phil Holmes wrote:
If you search in the NR for ragged, you'll find it is pretty much
interchangeably used in the paper{} block and the layout{} block. Is one
correct and the other deprecated? Are both correct, and if so why?
Something for GLISS?
Hello,
On 02/12/2010 22:50, Mark Polesky wrote:
James wrote:
If you search in the NR for ragged, you'll find it is
pretty much interchangeably used in the paper{} block
and the layout{} block. Is one correct and the other
deprecated? Are both correct, and if so why?
Something for
This for
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1287
Initial patch made and uploaded.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3369041
James
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond
Hang on.
I have made a mistake with git cl.
I was hoping this would give a new patch not add to the existing.
Sorry.
@graham (or anyone) can someone help me out with this?
The two patches are for independent files.
James
On 06/12/2010 13:25, James wrote:
This for
http://code.google.com
401 - 500 of 2312 matches
Mail list logo