website issue

I'm getting some spurious characters at http://lilypond.org/manuals.html. Screenshot attached. Here's some of the page source: b’Learning’: a “must-read” gentle introduction to LilyPond. (details of Learning) Thanks, David

Re: 2.21.0 released

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:42 PM Valentin Villenave wrote: > > On 4/9/20, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > Thank you so much for your dedication! > > Ditto; Phil, you and James may both have the most thankless and yet > crucial jobs in the LilyPond community, so praises to you both! (And > obviously to Jon

Re: RFC: rethink horizontal alignment of mid-staff bar numbers

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 6:11 AM Michael Käppler wrote: > > Am 15.11.2020 um 12:36 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > >> I will be the first responder and say that, of the options in the > >> pdf, I think Gould is the most appropriate. > > Yep. > +1 > > > > > > Werner > > > > Another vote for Gould.

Fix typos in \offset documentation (issue 322040043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: , Description: Fix typos in \offset documentation - Fix errors in description of OttavaBracket example - Minor improvements in wording Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/322040043/ Affected files (+5, -4 lines): M Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely

Re: lyrics hyphens question

Hi Kieren, On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi David (et al.), > > These are questions regarding the "lyric-word-reconstituter" in the thread > which includes the post > . > > I'd love to use it (or

Re: lyrics hyphens question

On Jun 13, 2017 9:55 PM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: Hi David (et al.), > It's not suitable as is, but easily remedied. The grob LyricWord is > defined in a hackish way so that it can fit in an LY file. So in C++, it would be non-hackish…? No, just parceling out the chunks to various .scm file

Re: Should we have a from-barline property in analogy to to-barline ?

On Jul 24, 2017 10:50 AM, "Kieren MacMillan" wrote: Hi Simon, > On 24.07.2017 13:58, David Kastrup wrote: >> Seems like an obvious addition. Would make stuff (like slurs, hairpins >> and so on) starting at the bar move backwards to the bar line. Probably >> also useful for non-spanners like a

Re: rest/mm-rest-markup

nly. >> >> rest-by-number-markup and rest-markup were impemented by myself >> commit ffa21bb1a55d2436bb432c4dff7ec04df95dc6f0 >> My second patch at all. > > Ah, I thought that it wasn't quite in the line of code I see you doing > these days. A few corners looke

Re: rest/mm-rest-markup

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2017-07-31 18:09 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> David Nalesnik writes: >> >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:08 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>>> Thomas Morley writes: >>>> >>>>>

Re: Issue 5187 Add command for Thin Aiken noteheads (issue 326510043 by karlinh...@gmail.com)

Hi Karlin, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Karlin High wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Karlin High wrote: >> All right, I'm giving up and asking for help. > > I got good help from Carl Sorenson; thanks! Changed patch for review, > now contains both code and documentation. > -- Glad y

Re: Anybody has a good explanation for _this_ use of grob-transformer?

Hi, On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:10 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Kastrup writes: > >>> %% no fail >>> \override TupletNumber.Y-offset = >>>#(ly:make-unpure-pure-container >>> (lambda (grob) (+ (ly:tuplet-number::calc-y-offset grob) 1)) >>> (lambda (grob start end) 1)) >>>

Re: Can alternateTextSpannerEngraver now completely replace Text_spanner_engraver in a public release?

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:49 AM Trevor Bača wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:58 AM James Lowe wrote: > > > Hello Trevor, > > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:45:35 -0600, Trevor Bača > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Question: is it now possible to replace Text_spanner_engraver with David > > > N.'s

Re: Can alternateTextSpannerEngraver now completely replace Text_spanner_engraver in a public release?

David, On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:35 AM David Kastrup wrote: > > David Nalesnik writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:49 AM Trevor Bača wrote: > >> > >> Could somebody else possibly provide James a patch of David N.'s > >> alternateTextSpann

can't update makeinfo from 5.1

Hi all, I've been out of the loop for a while, and recently decided to finish work on a patch I had put off. When I run configure, an error is returned saying that makeinfo is too old (5,2). When I run sudo apt-get install texinfo, I'm told that I have the latest version. makeinfo --version stil

Re: can't update makeinfo from 5.1

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 5:12 AM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > When I run configure, an error is returned saying that makeinfo is > > too old (5,2). When I run sudo apt-get install texinfo, I'm told > > that I have the latest version. makeinfo --version still returns > > 5.2. > > Ouch. `makeinfo`

problems with SSH key

end hung up unexpectedly __CONFIG___ [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ git config --list user.name=David Nalesnik user.email=david.nales...@gmail.com color.ui=auto rietveld.server=codereview.appspot.com rietveld.cc=lilypond-devel@gnu.org branch.staging.remote=origin branch.sta

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:23 AM David Kastrup wrote: > > David Nalesnik writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm having difficulty getting my LilyDev machine to work with SSH. > > I've followed the steps in the Contributor's Guide. Below is what

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:23 AM David Kastrup wrote: > > > > Rather sounds like a different problem like a dead server/connection. > > Try again? > > Same result And in fact any git command I try yields

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:17 AM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM David Nalesnik > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:23 AM David Kastrup wrote: > > > > > > Rather sounds like a different problem like a dead server/connectio

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:19 AM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:17 AM David Nalesnik > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM David Nalesnik > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:23 AM David Kastrup wrote: &

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:21 AM Federico Bruni wrote: > > > Il giorno gio 14 nov 2019 alle 10:17, David Nalesnik > ha scritto: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:34 AM David Nalesnik > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:23 AM David Kastrup w

Re: problems with SSH key

Good god On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 6:36 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > There is git-fsck . > [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ git fsck Segmentation faultrectories: 45% (116/256)

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:49 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > >> There is git-fsck . > >> > > > > [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ git fsck > > Segmentation faultrectories: 45% (116/256) > > Ouch. I've never experienced such a thing with git. Maybe something > is broken with your installation? Does r

Re: problems with SSH key

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:58 PM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 9:49 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > > > > >> There is git-fsck . > > >> > > > > > > [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ git fsck > > > Segmentation faul

git-cl command not found

Trying to get git-cl going I run into an interesting problem. I've installed LilyDev, so I should have git-cl. I update: [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ cd ~/git-cl/ [dev@lilydev:git-cl]$ git pull remote: Enumerating objects: 4, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done. remote: Compressing ob

Re: git-cl command not found

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:05 PM David Kastrup wrote: > > David Nalesnik writes: > > > Trying to get git-cl going I run into an interesting problem. I've > > installed LilyDev, so I should have git-cl. > > > > I update: > > [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]

shepherd a patch?

Hi all, I have a patch which implements measure-attached spanners. I am having a devil of a time getting the patch up for review. I simply can't get git-cl to upload it. (I suspect this has something to do with the number of files it touches--my system times out before everything can be uploade

Re: shepherd a patch?

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:19 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Hi David, > > Am Donnerstag, den 14.11.2019, 21:10 -0600 schrieb David Nalesnik: > > Hi all, > > > I have a patch which implements measure-attached spanners. I am > > having a devil of a time getting t

Re: shepherd a patch?

the patch. However, it's a long time since I uploaded > > anything, so I'm not sure my set-up still works. But I'll try. > > > > Best > > Urs > > > > Am 15.11.19 um 04:10 schrieb David Nalesnik: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I ha

Re: shepherd a patch?

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:33 AM Urs Liska wrote: > > Hi David, > > I feel responsible for this because I know where this is coming from ;-) Hah! :) (Seriously, though, this is something that I've wanted and Kieren has clamored for...) > > You can send me the patch. However, it's a long time s

Re: shepherd a patch?

Federico, On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 6:39 AM Federico Bruni wrote: > > This is what's recommended in the README: > https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/tree/master/mkosi#running-graphical-applications-from-the-container > I saw this, but I'm running LilyDev from a Win10 host. David

Re: shepherd a patch?

James and all, On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 7:31 AM David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:31 AM James Lowe wrote: > > > > David et al. > > > > > > Am 15.11.19 um 04:10 schrieb David Nalesnik: > > > > Would someone be willing to shepherd

Re: shepherd a patch?

Thanks, James! On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 4:07 AM James wrote: > > David, > > On 15/11/2019 13:31, David Nalesnik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:31 AM James Lowe wrote: > >> David et al. > >> > >> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:33:01 +0100, Urs Liska &

problem with git pull -r

Below is the console output. Any ideas? Thanks, David [dev@lilydev:lilypond-git]$ git pull -r error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/dev/jmandereau/merge-make-and-stepmake': 'refs/remotes/origin/dev/jmandereau' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/origin/dev/jmandereau/merge-make-and-stepmak

Re: problem with git pull -r

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:45 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 21.11.2019, 16:30 +0100 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > > > Below is the console output. Any ideas? > > > > > > Clone the repository anew, and everything should be fine again. > > This works of course but is pretty destructive

Re: Implement MeasureAttachedSpanner (issue 571180043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

Reviewers: lemzwerg, carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com, Dan Eble, thomasmorley651, t.daniels_treda.co.uk, kieren_kierenmacmillan.info, c_sorensen, checkma, Message: Name has been changed to MeasureSpanner, and all references (including file names) have been adjusted. Thanks for the reviews! https://c

Re: shepherd a patch?

Hi Trevor, On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 9:24 PM Trevor Bača wrote: > > Hi David (and Kieren and Urs), > > Awesome. I'll look forward to using measure-attached spanners, too. > > Trevor. > If you build from current master, you can use them now. Patch has been pushed! David

Re: [Notensatz im 21. Jahrhundert] Lily+Scheme bootcamp?

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:38 PM Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Hi Harm, > > > my talk would be probably of some interest for you. > > It absolutely is. =) > > > Alas, it will be in german, so I can't imagine how helpful it would be for > > you. > > Ja, es ist so lange her, dass ich Deutsch gesproc

Re: Janek is coming back to LilyPond! :-)

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:37 AM Janek Warchoł wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > for those who don't know me: I was an active member of the community > several years ago, contributed patches, co-authored LilyPond blog, and > together > with Urs Liska

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

On 2020/02/05 18:17:25, c_sorensen wrote: > > On 2/5/20, 7:40 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" > > wrote: > > Mike Solomon writes: > > > Janek Warcho

Re: Add Code of Conduct (issue 575620043 by janek.lilyp...@gmail.com)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 7:37 PM Thomas Morley wrote: > > Hi all, > > Being on the lists for many years now I remember only a few posts > which were inappropriate: > > Long time ago. there was a user with a post others felt uncomfortable > with. But Graham denied a problem. But there was a followup

Re: shape and chords

Hi Jan-Peter, First of all, I agree with David Kastrup that this is a situation where a deep fix is in order so that simultaneous ties may be tweaked directly. Your example is working as expected :) > Glad to hear it! > > To make it (more) usable, I think, we need wrapper functions, to avoid

Re: utf-8-strings

Hi Harm, I managed to drop about 300 lines, reducing > it to a quarter of the original. > Unfortunately, I'm getting "Invalid UTF-8 string..." warnings when I run your revised file. (I don't with the original...) -David ___ lilypond-devel mailing lis

Re: utf-8-strings

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > 2012/7/8 David Nalesnik : > >> Hi Harm, > >> > >>> I managed to drop about 300 lines, reducing > >>> it to a quarter of the original. > >> > >

Re: utf-8-strings

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2012/7/9 David Kastrup : > > David Nalesnik writes: > > > >> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:00 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> > >> Thomas Morley writes: > >&

Re: utf-8-strings

Hi Harm, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Thomas Morley < thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > (2) The code using the regexp library does not work with windows so > far (perhaps never). > Unfortunately, I'm still having no luck with Windows XP. (@David Kastrup: thank you for your suggestion

Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

Reviewers: , Description: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. The music function \alterBroken is intended to facilitate overrides applied independently to the pieces of broken spanners--one of the perennial difficulties faced by users of LilyPond (addressed in Extending 2.6:

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

Hi Janek, On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:43 AM, wrote: > > The function will override unbroken spanners, but it will ignore > > non-spanners with a warning. > > What about things like clef change at a line break - is it possible to > override

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:18 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > > > 2012/7/18 Janek Warchoł : > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Thomas Morley > >> wrote: > >>> 2012/7/18 Janek Warchoł : > I haven't seen it before - looks awesome :) > (however, it would be even more

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

Hi Janek, The only thing that > worries me is the indentation - there are some tabs used and > Frescobaldi displays them wrong (i suppose you meant 1 tab to be equal > to 4 spaces, not 8). > Oops! Usually I remember to convert tabs to spaces (and trim whitespace from the ends of lines), but not

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

David, Why does this have to be a list? Why not just make it two separate > arguments? > > If, for whatever reason, you really really really have this information > in a two-element list called whatever, you can still write > > \once \alterBroken "Staff.BarLine" #'color #@whatever > > It certainl

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

David, On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > > > David, > > > > Why does this have to be a list? Why not just make it two > > separate > > arguments? > > > > If, for wha

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

> 2012/7/18 Janek Warchoł : >> (however, it would be even more awesome if it was one general function >> for all purposes ;) ) Considering this some more, I think it's best at the moment to restrict the function to spanners. The expanded function encompassing spanners and breakable items ap

Re: Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond. (issue 6397054)

David, This use of \default for skipping optional arguments even in end > position may appear a bit contrived. > > However, \key \default and \mark \default existed (hardwired in the > parser) even before music functions ever heard of optional arguments, so > I consider it an accomplishment to hav

push patch for issue 2679

Hi, I don't have push ability, so would someone who does please push my patch for issue 2679 ("Add function for overriding broken spanners to LilyPond") for me? Thanks so much, David ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.g

Re: push patch for issue 2679

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:56 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > I get the patch fails to apply - presumably because > > music-functions.scm has been updated twice since the patch was > > created? Does this mean it needs rebasing, or somesuch? > > Likely. So, in this case,

Re: push patch for issue 2679

David, > > > > So, in this case, would I do something like: > > > > git pull -r > > > > then submit a new patch set? > > That's probably the easiest way. You'll likely get a merge conflict > with instructions. Personally, I use Emacs and > > M-x smerge-ediff RET > > on the problematic file(s) f

Re: push patch for issue 2679

David, > > > Is there any reason I can't manually remove the markers for the merge > > conflict, namely the lines: > > > > <<< HEAD > > > > === > > > Function for overriding broken spanners > > If the result is the intended result, sure. You are getting the merge > conflict beca

Re: push patch for issue 2679

> OK, I succeeded in doing this and uploaded a new patch set. I'm going to > redo this now as I see I failed to delete two newlines... > > OK, all should be well now. Patch corrected. -David ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https:

Re: push patch for issue 2679

e problems > that you discovered, we can only use it as a reviewing tool, not a > patch management tool. > > David Nalesnik should send you the file he gets from > git format-patch, after he fixed all merge conflicts etc. > Arggh...sorry for making a hash of this :( Hopefu

Re: push patch for issue 2679

David, On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:50 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Graham Percival > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote: > > > I'd be

Re: push patch for issue 2679

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > > > Arggh...sorry for making a hash of this :( > > By the way, you aren't. You are dealing with flexible and powerful > tools in action, and keeping up surprisingly well. That's t

Re: push patch for issue 2679

Phil, On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > ** > Pushed as > f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52. > Patchy is now running. > Thank you very much for doing this! -

Re: push patch for issue 2679

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > "Phil Holmes" writes: > > > BTW - apologies for top-posting and that, but my Windows email system > > takes your mails as HTML and does this with them. > > His mails contain HTML and plain text as alternatives, and Gnus (which I > use as

installing needed file within LilyDev

Hi all, I'm trying to compile the latest master within LilyDev, and I'm running into a problem when I try to prepare the build directory. I get the following error: ERROR: Please install required programs: lh CTAN package (texlive-lang-cyrillic or texlive-texmf-fonts) Can someone give me point

Re: installing needed file within LilyDev

Phil, On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Phil Holmes wrote: > I suspect this might be relevant: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2742 > Piece of cake! Thank you very much, David ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.

Re: [GLISS] turn xxx.yyy into ("xxx" "yyy")

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:38 AM, David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > Basically, if a music function wants to provide a shorthand for an > override, not being able to specify an optional context is a nuisance. > I currently have just the same problem writing a \hide function that is > supposed to be a

Re: Doc: improve documentation of Bézier curves (2858) (issue 6561064)

Trevor-- Thank you so much for taking this on! I've been pecking at documenting this for awhile, but got hung up on finding the perfect examples... What you have is clearer than what I cam up with. https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely Fil

Allow \shape to tweak music, swap its arguments (issue 6585052)

LGTM https://codereview.appspot.com/6585052/diff/1/input/regression/shape-other-curves.ly File input/regression/shape-other-curves.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6585052/diff/1/input/regression/shape-other-curves.ly#newcode18 input/regression/shape-other-curves.ly:18: \override Phra

Re: Allow \shape to tweak music, swap its arguments (issue 6585052)

On 2012/10/03 13:57:25, dak wrote: [...] To those suggestions let me answer with the famous answer to the question "Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western civilization?", namely with "I would consider it a good idea." Oh, for just one zinger like that... So the best I think I can do at

Re: Allow \shape to tweak music, swap its arguments (issue 6585052)

On 2012/10/03 15:17:26, dak wrote: [...] and I am currently immersed in parser work to make the Context.GrobName thing fly. Thank you very much for working on this! I am looking forward to being able to fix the mess at the beginning of \alterBroken (and a general offsetting function I hope

Re: Doc: improve documentation of Bézier curves (2858) (issue 6561064)

Trevor-- This looks great to me. I like the reordering, and I think the explanations are very clear. I've tweaked the curves a little in the examples (do what you like with my suggestions!), but otherwise: LGTM. https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/diff/6001/Documentation/notation/changing

Re: Doc: improve documentation of Bézier curves (2858) (issue 6561064)

LGTM. And thanks again for doing this! -David https://codereview.appspot.com/6561064/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: LilyPond 2.17.4 released

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > - > This version contains work in progress. You will have access to the very > latest features, but some may be incomplete, and you may encounter bugs and > crashes. If you require a stable version of Li

Re: [GLISS] turning strings to symbols (was: Issue 2883)

David, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:27 PM, David Kastrup wrote: [...] > But the _point_ of the _invasive_ patch and convert-ly rules was to get > feedback about what people think about a language change that > essentially makes it unnecessary for users to write symbols like #'xxx > or to even know

Re: Still alive

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Valentin Villenave wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:19 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org > wrote: >> Just a quick ping to let you know that I'm not dead - I've been swamped w/ >> work recently and just got engaged so I'm planning out a wedding (w00t!). > Congratulations

Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > "Phil Holmes" writes: > >> Surely this points to the pop operation in \override as being at >> fault? If \override was simply push, rather than pop-push then the >> code above would seem to work as intended. > > Sure. The idea presumably w

Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:15 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: >> >> Buildup of unwanted data or no, it would be useful to be able to write >> something like >> >> \toLast Accidental #'color >> >> to restore the previous overri

Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:29 AM, David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > \override Accidental color = #green > \override Accidental color = #red > \push\override Accidental color = #blue > [...] > \revert Accidental color > > or, if you prefer > \override Accidental color = #green > \override Accidental c

problem uploading a patch

Hi, I'm trying to upload a patch created in a branch to Rietveld, but I seem to be creating an unholy mess. I attempted to run git-cl upload master within my branch, but I end up with a huge list of recent commits not my own. The same thing happened when I ran git format-patch master and earlier

Re: problem uploading a patch

Hi Phil, On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Phil Holmes [...] > If you have a record of changes you've made, then I tend to use > >git reset --hard origin/master > which takes you back to the current state of master, and then >git am your.patch > > which applies the patch you have. Follow

Re: problem uploading a patch

Hi Phil. > david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git cl issue 2445 > Issue number: 2445 (http://codereview.appspot.com/2445) > david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git cl upload > Unable to determine default branch to diff against. > Either pass complete "g

Re: problem uploading a patch

David, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Try git rebase origin first I tried this, and this is what happened: david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git rebase origin fatal: Needed a single revision invalid upstream origin Should I try something like

Re: problem uploading a patch

Julien, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > On 16/10/2012 4:36 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >> >> david@david-desktop ~/lilypond-git (dev/measure_counter)$ git cl issue >> 2445 >> Issue number: 2445 (http://codereview.appspot.com/2445) > > >

Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond (issue 6730044)

Reviewers: , Message: Please review. Thanks! -David Description: Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond This patch allows the user to number groups of successive measures, which is useful as an aid to the performer in keeping track of repetitions. There is no requirement that the counted

Re: problem uploading a patch

David, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:04 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > >> Julien, >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Julien Rioux >> wrote: >>> On 16/10/2012 4:36 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: >>>> >>>> david@d

Re: problem uploading a patch

Julien, On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Julien Rioux wrote: > $ git cl issue 0 > > to reset (remove any association to a Rietveld issue) > > $ git cl upload origin/master > > to upload (given that the branch is no longer associated to a Rietveld > issue, it will create a new Rietveld issue) >

Re: Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond (issue 6730044)

Thanks for your review, Janek! https://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/10001/input/regression/measure-counter-broken.ly File input/regression/measure-counter-broken.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/diff/10001/input/regression/measure-counter-broken.ly#newcode6 input/regres

Re: Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond (issue 6730044)

On 2012/10/24 20:28:36, janek wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, wrote: > Also, should we include > > Measure_counter_engraver > > in the Staff context by default? > > (it'd make documenting it simpler in the @lilypond if nothing else :) ) +1 from me :) Janek

Change \alterBroken interface to match that of other tweak/overrides (issue 6784063)

LGTM! Thanks very much for doing this, David. https://codereview.appspot.com/6784063/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond (issue 6730044)

David, I don't mind making the changes, but I'm running into some problems. I used git pull -r before making a patch set and uploading to rietveld, but looking over the patch set there I see that other changes have found their way in--including your check-grob-path function. I'm probably making

Re: Issue 2445: Add measure counter to LilyPond (issue 6730044)

Thank you--I am a bit worried! Speaking of "patch," when I run git format-patch I get six separate patches. Is there any way to compress them into one so this is more convenient for you? -David https://codereview.appspot.com/6730044/ ___ lilypond-de

Re: new markup-comand `draw-dashed-line´ was: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 119, Issue 90

Hi Harm, On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Thomas Morley wrote: > Hi David (N), > > attached my first try. > > If the markup-property full-length is set #t, some calculations ensure > that no space occurs at line-end/begin. Some dashes will only be > partly visible, but I think its ok. > In additi

Re: Aleatoric / modern notation

Hi Jeffrey, I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for revising this more for me. I really appreciate your efforts, and > I will take a look at this asap and write back. For my le

Re: Aleatoric / modern notation

Hi again, On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > Hi Jeffrey, > > I'm copying this to the list since I myself am not sure about something here. > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Jeffrey Trevino > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Thank

Re: Aleatoric / modern notation

David, On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > David Nalesnik writes: > >> It turns out that the my definition of event-drul as '(() . ()) was >> the problem. I substituted (cons '() '()) and everything works just >> fine...even with

Re: Aleatoric / modern notation

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:30 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > The behavior is undefined if I remember correctly: an error is not > guaranteed by the standard. I think Guilev2 will produce an error, but > LilyPond is still at Guilev1. OK, thanks! -David _

Re: Aleatoric / modern notation

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:21 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: [...] > > Trying to work out the problem, I've done a little rewriting so I'll > include the engraver here. You can just substitute this in the > problematic file. > Well, I did break something. Here's the

Re: Allows for easier creation of many Lilypond objects via Scheme. (issue 7009047)

On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 7:22 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > On 24 déc. 2012, at 10:36, d...@gnu.org wrote: > > On 2012/12/24 07:28:17, mike7 wrote: > > On 24 déc. 2012, at 01:10, mailto:d...@gnu.org wrote: > > >> All of this is absolutely devastatingly horrible code that is not >> reconcilable

Re: Introducing two new markup-commands: draw-dashed-line and draw-dotted-line. (issue 7029045)

Harm-- This looks great! Thank you for the 'full-length option. I can't be alone in hating lines ending with incomplete dashes. All I have is a suggestion or two, and some quibbles. Besides what I've pointed out inline, I should mention that I got a number of whitespace errors when I applied

  1   2   3   4   5   >