> Here's my final version.
Looks great, thanks!
> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
> like to and to upload the SVG?
Hmm. I tried
lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
and get the error
warning: cannot find SVG font #f
/usr/local/share/lilypond/2.19.0/sc
>> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
>> like to and to upload the SVG?
>
> Hmm. I tried
>
> lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
>
> and get the error
>
> warning: cannot find SVG font #f
BTW, what about creating and installing SVG and WOFF fonts too for the
`
On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> My Windows machine won't convert this to SVG. Would someone else
>>> like to and to upload the SVG?
>>
>> Hmm. I tried
>>
>> lilypond -dbackend=svg stockhausen.ly
>>
>> and get the error
>>
>> warning: cannot find SVG font #f
>
> B
Hi,
this is another thing, but how about adding a nice standard notation
example to the wikipedia entry?
(like http://lilypond.org/ly-examples/bach-bwv610.png)
This Stockhausen is very impressive if you want to know that you can
tweak most everything to your needs. And it is now really close to t
Joram Berger schrieb:
>Hi,
>
>this is another thing, but how about adding a nice standard notation
>example to the wikipedia entry?
>(like http://lilypond.org/ly-examples/bach-bwv610.png)
>
>This Stockhausen is very impressive if you want to know that you can
>tweak most everything to your needs
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
the set there? I think that it would make an excellent addition.
As an _only_ exa
Hi,
2014/1/13 Phil Holmes :
> Here's my final version.
Looks very nice, good job!
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Of course that Stockhausen example on Wikipedia should be updated wit
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "Joram Berger" ;
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a
Phil Holmes writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Not aiming to disappoint you further, I always wondered why there are so
many completely different WikiPedia pages for LilyPond. Most have their
some good a
Am 13.01.2014 11:14, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "Joram Berger"
;
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: fixing German's Wikipedia entry of LilyPond
"Phil Holmes" writes:
Having spent the time on
Am 13.01.2014 10:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
the set there? I think that it would make an excellent addition.
I would second this.
One question which seems to be more of an issue when we're talking about
lilypond.org.
Are
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 13.01.2014 10:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
>> the set there? I think that it would make an excellent addition.
>
> I would second this.
> One question which seems to be more of an issue when we're talk
Am 13.01.2014 11:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 13.01.2014 10:58, schrieb David Kastrup:
Shouldn't we rather put this up on our own example page, to complement
the set there? I think that it would make an excellent addition.
I would second this.
One question which seems to
Hi,
now that my website patches have been pushed and marked as fixed (thanks
James) they are "to be verified".
What would be involved to verify a _webiste patch_?
I see that everything is fine on the live lilypond.org website. Can I
mark the patches as verified or should this _still_ do some
Urs Liska writes:
> Hi,
>
> now that my website patches have been pushed and marked as fixed
> (thanks James) they are "to be verified".
>
> What would be involved to verify a _webiste patch_?
>
> I see that everything is fine on the live lilypond.org website.
That does not mean the same as the
Am 13.01.2014 12:16, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Hi,
now that my website patches have been pushed and marked as fixed
(thanks James) they are "to be verified".
What would be involved to verify a _webiste patch_?
I see that everything is fine on the live lilypond.org website.
> Attached are a source version, without the font change for the time
> sig which crashes SVG creation, and the SVG output.
Thanks! Looks great. I've updated the Wikipedia page.
Werner
PS: Note that this example exhibits a bug in ImageMagick's `display'
program (version 6.7.8): All t
What is the exact objective of:
"Please read the Learning Manual before complaining about bugs! New
users occasionally believe that LilyPond is not working correctly, when
in fact it is working precisely as designed."
I find this slightly off-putting because it tells the reader: "If it
doesn
For me it now looks heavily distorted (wrong aspect ratio)
Joram
Am 13.01.2014 12:26, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>
>> Attached are a source version, without the font change for the time
>> sig which crashes SVG creation, and the SVG output.
>
> Thanks! Looks great. I've updated the Wikipedia pa
Urs Liska writes:
> What is the exact objective of:
>
> "Please read the Learning Manual before complaining about bugs! New
> users occasionally believe that LilyPond is not working correctly,
> when in fact it is working precisely as designed."
>
> I find this slightly off-putting because it tel
Am 13.01.2014 13:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
What is the exact objective of:
"Please read the Learning Manual before complaining about bugs! New
users occasionally believe that LilyPond is not working correctly,
when in fact it is working precisely as designed."
I find this
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 13.01.2014 13:03, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Or is this more the advice "well, we know it's complicated to start
>>> with, but please bear with us and read the LM"?
>>>
>>> I suggest getting rid of the "complaining about bugs" phrase. We want
>>> to
Reviewers: ,
Message:
How about that?
It doesn't include David's latest suggestions (because I was already
ready with it).
This suggestion is merely a kind of "in-place" rewrite, but
of course I'd also incorporate the more verbose suggestion
(particularly as I will be working on this
Text input
> For me it now looks heavily distorted (wrong aspect ratio)
Which browser? Have you tried reloading the page? I've checked with
Chrome, and everything's OK; it displays the SVG natively on the
LilyPond page. However, Firefox 26 under GNU/Linux displays a
generated PNG image (does anybody know
Hi lilypond.org,
We have updated your application listing for LilyPond 2.19.0-1 on
MacUpdate.com. Please take a moment to review your application's information to
make sure that everything is correct.
You may view your updated listing by visiting:
https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/19024/lilypon
Am 13.01.2014 14:04, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>
>> For me it now looks heavily distorted (wrong aspect ratio)
>
> Which browser?
Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
> On the other hand, the uncropped SVG image
>
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/archive
LGTM.
https://codereview.appspot.com/51390043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>> Which browser?
>
> Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
Very strange.
> The article image links to the uncropped image and shows the
> corresponding ~A4 aspect ratio.
??? Looking at the source code of the `LilyPond' article, I see
Screenshot = [[Datei:Klavierstüc
Carl,
On 13 January 2014 02:10, Carl Peterson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:34 AM, James wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> The following patches have been at 'please push' for the last 3
>> countdowns (i.e. over 9 days), and I am not seeing anything obvious that
>> leads me to believe that their i
works for me now.
Joram
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 01/13/2014 02:30 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Which browser?
Firefox 26, Chromium and Konqueror 4.8.5 - also after reload.
Very strange.
Fine here with Chromium (Debian wheezy, v31.something) and Iceweasel 23,
but the cropped image I made (see below) exhibits the "blue
only"-behaviour.
On 01/13/2014 02:17 PM, Joram Berger wrote:
On the other hand, the uncropped SVG image
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/archive/4/4d/20140113112433%21Klavierst%C3%BCcke_%28Stockhausen%29_Nr2-Klavierst%C3%BCck2-Anfang.svg
gets displayed fine, while the cropped SVG image
http://u
> This seems to be fine, but no clue why:
>
> inkscape --verb=EditSelectAllInAllLayers --verb=ObjectToPath
> --verb=FileSave --verb=FileClose file.svg
> ./svgclip.py -o cropped.svg file.svg
>
> where svgclip.py is here: https://github.com/skagedal/svgclip
I've followed that and uploaded a new vers
On 01/13/2014 04:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
This seems to be fine, but no clue why:
inkscape --verb=EditSelectAllInAllLayers --verb=ObjectToPath
--verb=FileSave --verb=FileClose file.svg
./svgclip.py -o cropped.svg file.svg
where svgclip.py is here: https://github.com/skagedal/svgclip
I've
We'll need a tracker issue to add some
explanatory text about isolated durations
to the LM (unless I've missed it), and
there is one place, marked below, where
this change should not be made.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/49470049/diff/20001/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Do
Hello all,
What would be involved in developing a feature to add notes or tweaks at an
arbitrary moment within a music expression?
e.g.
global = \repeat unfold 100 s1
music = \addAt (4 3/8) \global \once \override RehearsalMark.extra-offset
#’(-1 . 0)
where (4 3/8) means “in the fourt
LGTM
I can deal with my comment before I push
after the review if you like.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly
File ly/satb.ly (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/51230043/diff/20001/ly/satb.ly#newcode260
ly/satb.ly:260: \version "2.18.0"
This needs to be
> Excellent. This also solves the blue-notes issue in Firefox for me,
> even after clipping in Inkscape. So, to summarize for reference:
> [...] Correct?
It seems so. Thanks a lot for your assistance!
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lily
On 2014/01/13 22:59:21, Trevor Daniels wrote:
We'll need a tracker issue to add some
explanatory text about isolated durations
to the LM (unless I've missed it),
Uh, I think in a comparable situation we decided that the LM should not
be converted along with the rest since that would lead to use
On Jan 14, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> What would be involved in developing a feature to add notes or tweaks at an
> arbitrary moment within a music expression?
>
> e.g.
>
>global = \repeat unfold 100 s1
>music = \addAt (4 3/8) \global \once \override R
>global = \repeat unfold 100 s1
>music = \addAt (4 3/8) \global \once \override
>RehearsalMark.extra-offset #’(-1 . 0)
>
> where (4 3/8) means “in the fourth measure, at the moment of the 3rd
> eighth note”
I suggest that such a command allows for a third, optional parameter,
which ma
> Here’s a minimal example to get the same effect.
>
> \version "2.19.0"
>
> {
> \override Staff.TimeSignature.font-name = "New Century Schoolbook"
> a1
> }
Thanks. This is now issue #3809.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
Hi Kieren and all,
I use an engraver for this task, that looks for overrides, sets and
clefs at the current measure (of the context consisting this engraver)
and at the current moment inside this measure. So this is a little bit
different from your example in that it listens during compilation, wh
43 matches
Mail list logo
