Am 06.01.2014 13:54, schrieb Ian Hulin:
Hi Marc and all,
I've attached a scan of a fragment using some 18C alto and tenor clefs
(Handel, Acis and Galatea, 1718). I'm not suggesting you use these as
the altC clef as they are rather ugly, but rather to inform some
suggestions for the varC clef.
For those that like bar charts 'n' stuff (I do!)
2014/1/2 James :
Hello Francisco,
Happy New Year.
I wondered if you would update
http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/
Unless there is another located site for our git stats?
Regards
James
Hello, I have updated it.
Cheers,
--
Francisco
Am 02.01.2014 03:35, schrieb Carl Peterson:
This allows composers, transcribers and publishers to
create publication-quality music---beautiful music---without having to
spend as much time fighting the software's default settings.
Is that really true (that is: can one honestly write this)?
Regul
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 02.01.2014 03:35, schrieb Carl Peterson:
>> This allows composers, transcribers and publishers to
>> create publication-quality music---beautiful music---without having to
>> spend as much time fighting the software's default settings.
>
> Is that really true (that is: can
James writes:
> For those that like bar charts 'n' stuff (I do!)
>
> 2014/1/2 James :
>> Hello Francisco,
>>
>> Happy New Year.
>>
>> I wondered if you would update
>>
>> http://paconet.org/lilypond-statistics/
>>
>> Unless there is another located site for our git stats?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Jame
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box
The content of this box was somewhat confusing and inconsistent. See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2014-01/msg00011.html
This commit tries to incorporate the suggestions made in this thread
as far as I consider
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features"
Datum: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:30:51 +0100
Von: Urs Liska
An: Graham Percival
Am 03.01.2014 15:37, schrieb Urs Liska:
Graham Percival schrieb:
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib
https://codereview.appspot.com/45520044/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc
File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/45520044/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode674
lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:674: // won't be under the bracket
That's merely a heuristic, isn't it? What with
\n
Please see my comment below.
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode14
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode14
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
On
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
Am 07.01.2014 11:55, schrieb Phil Holmes:
...
Documentation/web/introduction.itexi:14: @subheading Our Mission
On 2014/01/07 10:17:47, PhilEHolmes wrote:
I dislike this intensely. It smacks of corporate nonsense - read the
text that
large conglomerates have under "Our mission". Please leave
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Web:Examples: Enclose in box
I think the pages below Introduction (and probably Community too)
should consistently start with a box and a subheading,
because there is no eye-catching page heading.
This is _one_ option to do that for the Examples page.
Others would be:
On 2014/01/07 10:45:22, uliska wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi
File Documentation/web/introduction.itexi (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/48430043/diff/1/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi#newcode14
Documentation/web/introdu
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Web:Productions: Add title box
As stated in https://codereview.appspot.com/48450044/
I think the Introduction pages should have a title box
giving the user a first idea about the page.
In this case the visitor (currently) would reach the page,
doesn't see a heading and
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Web:Background: Reword introductory paragraph
I've always found this page confusing because I didn't understand
why there is this "placeholder" page.
This commit addresses this by making the "manual" issue explicit.
Additionally I consider it more useful to _first_ tel
On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
> - Original Message - From:
> To:
> Cc: ;
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
>
>>
>> Any other suggestions?
>
> "Our goal" :-) No less achieved than a
Am 07.01.2014 14:32, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
- Original Message - From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
Any other suggestions?
"Our goal" :-
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 07.01.2014 14:32, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>
>>
>> On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>>
>>> - Original Message - From:
>>> To:
>>> Cc: ;
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Re
Am 07.01.2014 14:41, schrieb Carl Peterson:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 07.01.2014 14:32, schrieb Carl Sorensen:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 3:56 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
- Original Message - From:
To:
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: W
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska"
>
>
>>> I believe I had suggested "purpose." I realize that's not much better
>>> than goal/mission, but it's less corporate than "mission," and is more
>>> focused on why we exist than what we thi
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska"
I believe I had suggested "purpose." I realize that's not much better
than goal/mission, but it's less corporate than "mission," and is more
focused on why we exist than what we think we've accomplished (as goal
and objective are), in my opinion.
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Urs Liska" ; "Carl Peterson"
Cc: "Lilypond Dev"
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
- Original Message -
From: "Urs Liska"
I believe I had suggested "
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Peterson"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "Lilypond Dev"
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message
Am 07.01.2014 15:18, schrieb Phil Holmes:
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Urs Liska" ; "Carl Peterson"
Cc: "Lilypond Dev"
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: Web:Introduction: Rename "Our Goal" box (issue 48430043)
- Original Message - From: "U
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014, Carl Peterson wrote:
> However, an alternative would be to somehow build the SVG to PNG at
> the expected size(s) as part of make. Not sure what that would take,
> though, or if it would add yet another dependency to the list.
For Debian, I'd be happy if the PNG was there so l
26 matches
Mail list logo
