On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> > > >>> I believe I had suggested "purpose." I realize that's not much better >>> than goal/mission, but it's less corporate than "mission," and is more >>> focused on why we exist than what we think we've accomplished (as goal >>> and objective are), in my opinion. >>> >>> Carl P. >>> >> >> Yes I recall that. For me this somehow sounds wrong - but again that may >> be due to my non-native "ear". >> Phil, what do you think about "purpose"? >> >> Urs > > > > To me, it's a very uninspiring word. NASA had a goal of landing a man on > the moon (http://history.nasa.gov/moondec.html). Its purpose was much more > mundane. > > -- > Phil Holmes
Would "vision" be better? I realize this will sound to some people as corporate as "mission," but there you go. Carl P. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
