On 07.05.2010, at 21:53, David Kastrup wrote:
"Boris Shingarov" writes:
Hi David,
for theoretical work it often is necessary to write several short
systems in one line, interspersed with text.
This is exactly what we are doing.
I don't manage to have
a) new systems continue aligned to t
2010/5/7 Neil Puttock :
> On 4 May 2010 23:49, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> If your patch looks for texidoc= alone and not for texidoc[lang]= etc
>> any more, we should change all texidoc[lang]= string names in all
>> [lang]/texidocs snippets, for every [lang].
>
> It only touches .texidoc files which
David Kastrup schrieb:
[...]
So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We can't
have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example. But if we
write something like
and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of
subvoice 1 (a subvoice having it
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 5/7/10 12:36 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
I found some typos and translation errors in the German documentation
of the current development version.
Should I create a patch to correct them, or should I inform the
current translator about my observations - or both?
Hi David,
> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We can't
> have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example. But if we
> write something like
>
>
>
> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of
> subvoice 1 (a subvoice having its own
2010/5/7 Graham Percival :
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/5/6 Jean-Charles Malahieude :
>>
>>> There still remains a /big/ problem:
I'd also call this a big problem.
>>
>> We are talking about issue #1036,
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=103
Mark Polesky wrote Saturday, May 08, 2010 3:01 AM
*** This refers to LM 3.2.3 "Voices and vocals" ***
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I put this in after several questions on -user about how
this should be done, but I wasn't very happy with it. If
you can come up with a better way of coding a solo ve
James Bailey:
> On 07.05.2010, at 21:53, David Kastrup wrote:
> > "Boris Shingarov" writes:
> >>> for theoretical work it often is necessary to write several short
> >>> systems in one line, interspersed with text.
...
> > \markuplines {
> > \justified-lines {
> > some text
> > \score {
On Fri, 07 May 2010 21:53:54 0200, David Kastrup wrote:
If we had something like that, one would not need to meddle with
> paddings and the resulting spurious spacings.
Like in the old joke of a composition student being given advice to
take the easy route and just write his professor's Prae
> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
> But if we write something like
>
>
>
> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of
> subvoice 1 (a subvoice having its own engraver
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
>> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
>> But if we write something like
>>
>>
>>
>> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the engraver of
>> subvoice 1 (a
"Boris Shingarov" writes:
> On Fri, 07 May 2010 21:53:54 0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> If we had something like that, one would not need to meddle with
> > paddings and the resulting spurious spacings.
>
> Like in the old joke of a composition student being given advice to
> take the easy rou
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:32:48AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2010/5/7 Graham Percival :
> >> We are talking about issue #1036,
> >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1036
> >
> > Thanks for identifying it, Francisco. Jean-Charles: we're not
> > planning on working on that iss
Hi,
I have made some changes on my emacs lilypond-mode files to process
lytex files as suggested here
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/usage-big-page#Invoking-lilypond_002dbook)...
directly with: "lilypond-book --pdf file.lytex" and "pdflatex file.tex"
I'm sending the patches... P
On Sat, 8 May 2010, josé henrique padovani wrote:
Hi,
I have made some changes on my emacs lilypond-mode files to process lytex
files as suggested here
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/usage-big-page#Invoking-lilypond_002dbook)...
directly with: "lilypond-book --pdf file.lytex"
Le 8 mai 2010 à 17:37, James E. Bailey a écrit :
>
>
> On Sat, 8 May 2010, josé henrique padovani wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I have made some changes on my emacs lilypond-mode files to process lytex
>> files as suggested here
>> (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/usage-big-page#Invoking-li
Em 08/05/10 13:00, Nicolas Sceaux escreveu:
I don't know if this can be changed in the local .emacs file, but I just edit lilypond-mode.el and
replace "xpdf" with "open" and it works fine.
(custom-set-variables
;; custom-set-variables was added by Custom.
;; If you edit it by han
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
>> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
>> But if we write something like
>>
>>
>>
>> and use @1 with the scope of a tweak, and let it use the
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>>> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
>>> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
>>> But if we write something like
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and use @1 with the
>> I like this. Up to now noone had ever such an idea, and your
>
> This is false.
Sorry. I've then missed the discussion (or ignored it unconsciously).
> I had the idea earlier and unleashed it on the world. It was called
> the Thread context, and it was a disaster, because it would die or
2010/5/8 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:32:48AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/5/7 Graham Percival :
>> >> We are talking about issue #1036,
>> >> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1036
>> >
>> > Thanks for identifying it, Francisco. Jean-Charles: we're not
>
I haven't checked with the latest snapshot, but before I
forget, I'll just mention that some shape note heads aren't
printing in the docs:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond//Documentation/notation/note-heads.html#Shape-note-heads
- Mark
___
lily
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> I haven't checked with the latest snapshot, but before I
> forget, I'll just mention that some shape note heads aren't
> printing in the docs:
>
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond//Documentation/notation/note-heads.html#Shape-note-heads
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>>> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
>>> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
>>> But if we write something like
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and use @1 with the
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 07:20 -0400, Boris Shingarov wrote:
> On Fri, 07 May 2010 21:53:54 0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > If we had something like that, one would not need to meddle with
> > paddings and the resulting spurious spacings.
>
> Like in the old joke of a composition student being gi
2010/5/8 David Kastrup :
> And if we don't call it "subvoice" but work this as "labels"? The point
> would be to make (most importantly spanning) engravers deal with
> multiple simultaneously active engraving entities. One would use
> "labels" as a tweak to make them ignore ending spanners not in
Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2010, um 14:28:18 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
> > can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
Actually, by extending the engraver a little bit it should be possible. I have
had that on my list
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>>> I like this. Up to now noone had ever such an idea, and your
>>
>> This is false.
>
> Sorry. I've then missed the discussion (or ignored it unconsciously).
Some archeology:
Threads were introduced in lilypond 01.13,
- grand E
On 5/8/10 2:43 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2010, um 14:28:18 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
>>> So how about the ultimate tweak: using a separate engraver? We
>>> can't have overlapping slurs with a single engraver, for example.
>
> Actually, by extending the engraver a lit
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> They were finally removed in LilyPond 2.1.13 (according to convert-ly)
>
> IIRC we kept them around for so long, since they were the only way to
> get per-notehead styles within a chord. After we introduced \tweak
> (IIRC), there was no n
Hi Carl,
On 06/05/10 01:17, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/5/10 11:03 AM, "Ian Hulin" wrote:
Hi all,
I put this patch up for review about a month back.� Patrick has given some
feedback and I have implemented his comments.� Could someone have a look and
if it's OK push, please?
I didn't
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Since submitting my original patch, there's a tracker open to add a -q
> option to Lilypond to implement Unix-style 'quiet' processing of all
> informational progress messages during a Lilypond compilation run.
>
> This and the reques
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I suggest you dump this as a template in A.4 for now.
Let me make sure I'm doing this right.
1) commit the attached patch
2) run scripts/auxiliar/makelsr.py
3) commit that result as "Doc: Update LSR."
4) make doc (compiles cleanly)
5) post the patch here for approval
6) pu
On 5/8/10 5:22 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 12:21:08AM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote:
>> Since submitting my original patch, there's a tracker open to add a -q
>> option to Lilypond to implement Unix-style 'quiet' processing of all
>> informational progress messages during a
34 matches
Mail list logo
