Hi Carl,
On 06/05/10 01:17, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/5/10 11:03 AM, "Ian Hulin"<i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote:
Hi all,
I put this patch up for review about a month back.� Patrick has given some
feedback and I have implemented his comments.� Could someone have a look and
if it's OK push, please?
I didn't see any issues in the patch, except that I was not sure that the
discussion on -devel had reached resolution:
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/28150/focus=28164>
Did we ever achieve resolution on this?
I see votes for
Han-Wen: Not in this format; give a summary of the results
Mats: Yes
James Lowe: Yes, if you add the name of the output file
Mark Polesky: Yes
Ian: Yes
Graham: Yes
Bert: Not needed, because the GUI can show the error message from the
error code.
So the majority says go ahead, I think. Han-Wen, are you OK with that?
Thanks,
Carl
Since submitting my original patch, there's a tracker open to add a -q
option to Lilypond to implement Unix-style 'quiet' processing of all
informational progress messages during a Lilypond compilation run.
This and the request for a message with a summary of results of
compiling all files during a compilation session are enhancement
requests on top of this patch and beyond the scope of what I wanted to
achieve here.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
